Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Case Report
Clinical research study
Current Issue
Editorial Board
Literature Review
Narrative review
Original Article
Research Article
Review Article
Short Report
Surgical techniques
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Case Report
Clinical research study
Current Issue
Editorial Board
Literature Review
Narrative review
Original Article
Research Article
Review Article
Short Report
Surgical techniques
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Case Report
14 (
4
); 548-549
doi:
10.1016/j.jor.2017.07.014

Traumatic cervical epidural hematoma due to fusion mass fracture following elective rod removal

Division of Spine Surgery, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA

⁎Corresponding author: Alan H. Daniels. Alan_Daniels@Brown.edu

Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Reed Elsevier India Pvt. Ltd. and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

Abstract

Abstract

Many studies have examined complications associated with spinal instrumentation, however, few have analyzed complications associated with removal. In this case report, we outline the course of a patient who presented with cervical epidural hematoma secondary to fusion mass fracture five years after removal of spinal hardware.

Keywords

Epidural hematoma
Cervical fracture
Fusion mass fracture
Hardware removal
Spinal instrumentation
1

1 Introduction

There are multiple studies in the literature examining complications associated with spinal instrumentation. However, only a few studies describe complications associated with removal of spinal hardware.1,2 In these series, patients underwent removal of hardware due to infection, pain secondary to the hardware, or hardware failure. In the adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients with a solid fusion mass, there are reports of loss coronal plane correction following removal of instrumentation due to symptomatic hardware or late infection.1 Similarly, loss of sagittal plane correction has been described following removal of hardware in adult patients with fusion of five or more spinal segments.2 To our knowledge, no previous studies documented fusion mass fracture following removal of spinal implants. In this case report, we outline the course of a patient who presented with cervical epidural hematoma secondary to fusion mass fracture five years after removal of spinal hardware (Fig. 1).

(A). Pre-operative fluoroscopy imaging showing fusion construct after distal rod removal. (B). Mid-sagittal T2-weighted image one month prior to injury demonstrating solid fusion mass. (C). Para-sagittal CT scan revealing non-displaced fracture through fusion mass at C6 level. (D). Mid-sagittal MRI from Emergency Department shows acute hematoma with severe cervical spina cord compression and injury to anterior and posterior soft tissues with bony edema of C6 and C7 endplates.
Fig. 1 (A). Pre-operative fluoroscopy imaging showing fusion construct after distal rod removal. (B). Mid-sagittal T2-weighted image one month prior to injury demonstrating solid fusion mass. (C). Para-sagittal CT scan revealing non-displaced fracture through fusion mass at C6 level. (D). Mid-sagittal MRI from Emergency Department shows acute hematoma with severe cervical spina cord compression and injury to anterior and posterior soft tissues with bony edema of C6 and C7 endplates.
2

2 Clinical case

A 71-year-old female presented to the Emergency Department after a rollover motor vehicle collision complaining of neck pain and bilateral arm weakness. Examination in the Emergency Department demonstrated an incomplete motor deficit, classified as ASIA D on the ASIA Impairment Scale. She had a history of multiple prior cervical spine operations, including a C2-T2 posterior decompression and instrumented fusion in the remote past, followed by removal of the distal rods 5 years prior to the injury (Image A). One month prior to injury, an MRI was obtained due to possible radicular arm pain, which revealed a solid fusion mass from C2-T2 with no central or neuroforaminal stenosis (Image B).

Following the injury, CT scan revealed a nondisplaced fracture through the fusion mass at C6 at the caudal terminus of the intact rods (Image C, arrow). Cervical MRI revealed a T2 heterogenous mass consistent with acute hematoma from C5-7 with severe cervical cord compression (Image D, arrow) and inferior endplate edema at C6 and superior endplate edema at C7 representative of a fracture through the anterior and posterior fusion mass (Image D, arrowhead).

The patient was taken to the operating room for emergent decompression of the cervical epidural hematoma and revision of her instrumented fusion from C2-T3. She was managed in a hard cervical collar for 6 weeks. There were no specific medical modalities during her hospitalization or post-operative period. The patient returned to her baseline neurological status of ASIA E following surgery. She continues to have no neurologic deficits at 1-year follow-up.

3

3 Discussion

Complications associated with placement of spinal instrumentation are well documented in the literature, but few studies describe complication associated with removal of spinal implants. No previous studies reported traumatic fusion mass fracture after spinal hardware removal. However, a recent case series recommended reimplantation of hardware across a solid fusion mass in patients with adult spinal deformity to prevent spontaneous fusion mass fractures.3 The cervicothoracic and thoracolumbar junctions are well-defined areas of potential instability in the spine.4,5 Spinal surgeons may consider retention of rods for long-term stabilization across the cervicothoracic6 and thoracolumbar7 junctions, even in patients with evidence of a solid arthrodesis, to protect against fusion mass fracture.

Conflict of interest

None.

References

  1. , , , , . Loss of Coronal correction following instrumentation removal in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006;31(1):E67-E72.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. , , , . Loss of sagittal plane correction after removal of spinal implants. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000;25(19):2453-2460.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. , , , , , , . Fracture of fusion mass after hardware removal in patients with high sagittal imbalance. J Neurosurg Spine. 2016;24(4):639-643.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. , , , , . Spinal disorders at the cervicothoracic junction. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1994;19(22):2557-2564.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. , , , , . Thoracolumbar Burst fracture: a biomechanical investigation of its multidirectional flexibility. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1994;19(5)
    [Google Scholar]
  6. , , , . Construct type and risk factors for pseudarthrosis at the cervicothoracic junction. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015;40(11):E613-E617.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. , , , . Biomechanical study of thoracolumbar junction fixation devices with different diameter dual-rod systems. J Neurosurg Spine. 2006;4(3):206-212.
    [Google Scholar]
Show Sections