Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Case Report
Clinical research study
Current Issue
Editorial Board
Literature Review
Narrative review
Original Article
Research Article
Review Article
Short Report
Surgical techniques
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Case Report
Clinical research study
Current Issue
Editorial Board
Literature Review
Narrative review
Original Article
Research Article
Review Article
Short Report
Surgical techniques
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

58 (); 96-101
doi:
10.1016/j.jor.2024.07.002

Publications and ranking in orthopaedics and sports medicine of European countries during the last three decades: A bibliometric analysis

Department of Orthopaedics and Joint Replacement Surgery, Indraprastha Apollo Hospitals, New Delhi, India
Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Eifelklinik St.Brigida, 52152, Simmerath, Germany
Department of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, Academic Hospital of Bolzano (SABES-ASDAA), 39100, Bolzano, Italy
Department of Life Sciences, Health, and Health Professions, Link Campus University, 00165, Rome, Italy

⁎Corresponding author: Filippo Migliorini. migliorini.md@gmail.com

Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Reed Elsevier India Pvt. Ltd. and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

Abstract

Abstract

The present investigation examined the trend of publications and ranking in Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine of European countries during the years 1996 to 2022 and compared these with all the regions globally.

In September 2023, the SCOPUS data of publications in Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine from the SCImago Journal & Country Rank website were retrieved. All the data from Western and Eastern Europe were extracted from the overall data of the global countries and merged into Excel files, for each of the years 1996–2022 and 2022.

Western European countries contributed significantly to the global share of publications in Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine with nearly 1/3rd of the total publications. Eastern European countries’ contribution was minimal to the global publications and was almost 10 times less than the Western European countries. The total number of publications in the area of Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine from 1996 to 2022 at the European scale was led by the United Kingdom (N = 51510) and has maintained its supremacy until recently, in 2022. Amongst Western European countries, during the cumulative period of 1996–2022, the maximum contributions were made by the United Kingdom (N = 51510), and also in 2022, the United Kingdom contributed maximally (N = 3339). In the cumulative period of 1996–2022, Poland contributed maximally (N = 4049) among the Eastern European countries. In 2022, the maximum contribution from the Eastern European countries came from the Russian Federation (N = 462).

The European continent is the major contributor to Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine research and publications, with almost 1/3rd of the global share of publications. Western European countries are far ahead in their contributions than Eastern European countries.

Abstract

Highlights

•Western European countries contributed significantly to the global share of publications in Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine.•Eastern European countries contributed minimally to global publications and were almost ten times less than Western European countries.•The total number of publications in Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine from 1996 to 2022 at the European scale was led by the United Kingdom.

Keywords

Orthopaedics
Europe
Bibliometrics
SCImago journal and country rank
Sports medicine
1

1 Introduction

Research productivity and performance of a country are commonly measured based on the total number of publications.1–3 Bibliometric research reflects the aspect of clinical excellence, highlights medical developments or knowledge gaps, and functions as a basis for future-oriented research.4–7 With the implementation of evidence-based medicine in 1990, the number of published scientific papers has increased enormously.8–10 This trend is based on the multitude of new medical and technological achievements.11–14 Also in orthopaedics, the increased interest in publications has been observed resulting in the need for a structured selection of information.15,16 Although the total number of publications a country contributed is not synonymous with output quality, it certainly indicates the influence of a country in a specific scientific field and is an important determinant of economic growth.17,18 Previous bibliographic analyses of orthopaedic academic outputs that focused on the total number of publications per country over different periods predominantly referred to publications of the major orthopaedic journals or the most cited papers in general orthopaedics and orthopaedic sub-specialities.19–23

Europe is the second-smallest continent and the European Union (EU) and the Council of Europe are two important organisations representing the European continent. The EU comprises 27 European states, but some important nations like the United Kingdom (UK), Norway and Switzerland are out of this group. Five European countries (Germany, Russia, UK, France, and Italy) are ranked in the top 10 of the world's largest national economies in Gross Domestic Product (GDP).24 The European Commission's report for 2022 shows that the EU has remained one of the most valuable regions in terms of scientific production. While representing just 6 % of the world's population, it accounts for about 18 % of global Research and development (R&D) investments and 21 % of the worldwide top-cited scientific publications.25

To the best of our knowledge, no one has analysed the European publications in orthopaedics and sports medicine over the last three decades. The present investigation evaluates the trend of publications and ranking in Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine of European countries during the last 26 years (1996–2022) and compares these with global country rankings. Furthermore, an analysis was carried out to compare the publication trends between Eastern and Western European countries.

2

2 Methods

2.1

2.1 Search strategy

In September 2023, a search of the literature was conducted using the SCImago Journal & Country Rank website.14 This online database service accesses the large Elsevier's abstract and citation database SCOPUS, which includes a high volume of literature from high-ranked peer-reviewed journals. The first step of the systematic literature search was to identify and retrieve all publications published worldwide in the field of orthopaedics and sports medicine between the years 1996 and 2022. Furthermore, the number of publications published only in 2022 was determined for comparison. Secondly, two further searches were carried out in the same way, limited to the totality of Western European and Eastern European publications in the period between 1996 and 2022. Likewise, the number of Western and Eastern European investigations published only in the year 2022 was obtained for comparison. In detail, the following search strategies were used, taking into account the indicated time constraints: For global countries including all country regions: SCImago website ≫ Country ranking ≫ All Subject Areas ≫ Orthopaedics & Sports Medicine ≫ All Regions ≫ Year (1996–2022 and 2022). For Western Europe: SCImago website ≫ Country ranking ≫ All Subject Areas ≫ Orthopaedics & Sports Medicine ≫ Western Europe ≫ Year (1996–2022 and 2022). For Eastern Europe: SCImago website ≫ Country ranking ≫ All Subject Areas ≫ Orthopaedics & Sports Medicine ≫ Eastern Europe ≫ Year (1996–2022 and 2022).

2.2

2.2 Data collection and synthesis

Data extraction of the respective fields was done by the main author (X.X). All the data from Western and Eastern Europe were extracted from the overall data of the global countries and merged into a separate file, in which the data are listed separately by country region. This was done first for the entire period between 1996 and 2022, and subsequently for the data from 2022. To create publication rankings the following data were included: country of publication, total number of documents, number of citable documents, citations counts, self-citation counts, citations per document, and H-index. After listing all results based on the total number of publications in descending order, the European top five countries were identified. The authors performed a refined analysis of the annual number of European orthopaedic articles published in the indicated time constraint, as well as their annual rate of increase, and compared these results with the overall data of the global ranking. Furthermore, the share of publications from Western and Eastern Europe in the worldwide outcome was determined. In the last step of data evaluation, the authors focused on the comparison of publication performance between Western and Eastern Europe. Collected data were structured using Microsoft Office Excel version 16.72 (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, USA).

3

3 Results

3.1

3.1 Global ranking

The global ranking covers 199 countries which published papers in the field of orthopaedics and sports medicine between 1996 and 2022. A total of 668479 publications were counted in this period. As in comparable previous rankings, this ranking was led by the USA with a total of 189938 publications. With an H-index of 467, the USA also showed the highest impact in terms of publication citation counts. In 2022 the total number of publishing countries decreased to a total number of 159. The USA remained in first place again with a total of 12203 and an unchanged H-index of 467. The European ranking was led by the top five countries: the United Kingdom, Germany, France, Spain and Italy. The top three countries (United Kingdom, Germany, and France) and Spain have maintained their rank in the top ten nations over the cumulative period from 1996 to 2022. A notable exception is Italy, which counted in the global rank two places down from 9th to 11th in 2022 (Table 1). The global ranking of all countries and all regions is presented in Supplementary Tables 1 and 2

Table 1 Global Ranking of the top 5 European nations.
Country Rank in 1996–2022 Rank in 2022
European (n) Global (n) European (n) Global (n)
United Kingdom 1 2 1 3
Germany 2 4 2 4
France 3 7 3 7
Italy 4 9 5 11
Spain 5 10 4 9
3.2

3.2 Total Western and Eastern European publications compared to the total number of publications worldwide

Western European countries contributed significantly to the global share of publications in orthopaedics and sports medicine, accounting for 35.6 % (238145 of 668479 publications), almost one-third of the total. The contribution of Eastern European countries to worldwide publications was minimal at 2.4 % (16201 of 668479 publications), almost ten times lower than the contribution of the Western European countries (Table 2).

Table 2 Total documents published by European countries, compared to total global publications.
Regions Total Publication during 1996–2022 n (%) Total Publications in 2022 n (%)
Global countries 668479 (100 %) 52120 (100 %)
Western Europe 238145 (35.6 %) 17536 (33.6 %)
Eastern Europe 16201 (2.4 %) 1611 (3.1 %)
3.3

3.3 Trend of European publication in the period from 1996 to 2022

The total number of publications in the area of Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine in the period from 1996 to 2022 (26 years) at the European scale was led by the United Kingdom (N = 51510). Of these publications, a total of 47766 publications were cited 1386125 times. Thus The United Kingdom also achieved the highest H-index of 309. With a gap of 10883 publications (N = 40627) Germany followed and reached the second rank. The citable documents of Germany were similarly high in relative comparison, with 37686 publications cited. However, with a total of 726597 citations, they only achieved an H-index of 230. France (N = 25877), Italy (N = 19062), and Spain (N = 17131) published about half compared to the United Kingdom. This is also reflected in the influence of these countries, as measured by the number of publications cited. The detailed ranking and citation counts are given in Tables 1 and 2 The United Kingdom has remained and maintained its supremacy until recently in 2022 with 3399 publications, followed by Germany (N = 2564), France (N = 1669), Spain (N = 1564), and Italy (N = 1137) (Tables 1 and 2). All top five countries (United Kingdom, Germany, France, Italy, Spain) have shown an increasing trend of publications, year-wise since 1996, and the top three nations United Kingdom, Germany, and France have maintained their rankings. Spain has recently taken over the fourth rank from Italy in publication numbers (Tables 1 and 2). Fig. 1 shows an overview of the year-wise increase of the top five European countries.

The trend of orthopaedic publications of the top 5 European nations from 1996 to 2022.
Fig. 1 The trend of orthopaedic publications of the top 5 European nations from 1996 to 2022.
3.4

3.4 Comparison of publication trends between Western and Eastern European countries

During 1996–2022, a total of 27 Western European countries contributed to publications, while only 23 Eastern European countries contributed (Table 3). In 2022, 24 Western European nations and 23 Eastern European nations made their research contributions (Table 4).

Table 3 Rankings and country metrics of European countries 1996–2022 (Source: SCIMAGO).
Rank Country Documents Citable documents Citations Self-citations Citations per document H index
Western Europe
1 United Kingdom 51510 47766 1386125 294103 26.9 309
2 Germany 40627 37686 726597 170571 17.9 230
3 France 25877 24347 521052 96337 20.1 218
4 Italy 19062 17997 389955 72764 20.5 187
5 Spain 17131 16335 268114 64936 15.7 167
6 Switzerland 14646 13801 446264 53051 30.5 237
7 Netherlands 13960 13155 448908 55807 32.2 222
8 Sweden 9791 9213 377443 42934 38.6 221
9 Belgium 7436 7058 221085 20328 29.7 178
10 Austria 7144 6697 143795 15004 20.1 136
11 Denmark 6424 6065 225345 28845 35.1 184
12 Norway 5442 5153 208235 23036 38.3 180
13 Greece 5162 4903 106668 9149 20.7 119
14 Finland 4616 4448 189037 16461 41.0 162
15 Ireland 4099 3895 89530 8952 21.8 114
16 Portugal 3881 3761 66646 14048 17.2 99
17 Luxembourg 537 467 8016 791 14.9 46
18 Cyprus 274 258 3210 207 11.7 29
19 Iceland 203 201 6032 310 29.7 39
20 Monaco 134 127 3391 295 25.3 30
21 Malta 90 87 706 20 7.8 13
22 Faroe Islands 56 53 962 160 17.2 20
23 Liechtenstein 15 15 309 4 20.6 7
24 Andorra 10 10 41 2 4.1 3
25 San Marino 10 10 739 1 73.9 5
26 Greenland 5 5 125 22 25.0 4
27 Gibraltar 3 3 10 1 3.3 2
Eastern Europe
1 Poland 4049 3966 44964 8025 11.1 77
2 Russian Federation 2791 2761 13650 3277 4.9 49
3 Czech Republic 2474 2431 25317 3908 10.2 65
4 Croatia 1124 1042 20649 1948 18.4 61
5 Slovenia 963 915 19171 2101 19.9 65
6 Hungary 822 798 22637 1142 27.5 72
7 Serbia 807 777 9696 1118 12.0 45
8 Slovakia 524 505 3935 404 7.5 28
9 Estonia 430 423 10252 870 23.8 49
10 Lithuania 421 416 5418 540 12.9 33
11 Romania 370 351 3866 303 10.5 29
12 Ukraine 348 344 1080 362 3.1 17
13 Bulgaria 324 311 3517 303 10.9 27
14 Bosnia and Herzegovina 252 250 1542 112 6.1 20
15 Montenegro 121 120 569 281 4.7 13
16 Georgia 80 76 950 12 11.9 20
17 Macedonia 76 76 687 94 9.0 15
18 Latvia 66 63 480 17 7.3 12
19 Belarus 57 57 375 18 6.6 10
20 Armenia 43 41 333 13 7.7 10
21 Albania 27 26 254 5 9.4 8
22 Moldova 16 16 88 5 5.5 5
23 Azerbaijan 16 16 87 3 5.4 5
Table 4 Ranking and country metrics of European countries in 2022 (Source: SCIMAGO).
Rank Country Documents Citable documents Citations Self-citations Citations per document H index
Western Europe
1 United Kingdom 3399 3183 3426 1118 1.0 309
2 Germany 2564 2368 2116 731 0.8 230
3 France 1669 1551 1333 416 0.8 218
4 Spain 1656 1602 1709 614 1.0 167
5 Italy 1564 1492 1534 578 1.0 187
6 Switzerland 1142 1058 989 216 0.9 237
7 Netherlands 1137 1059 999 211 0.9 222
8 Sweden 703 668 743 153 1.1 221
9 Belgium 528 499 522 89 1.0 178
10 Austria 518 493 395 109 0.8 136
11 Denmark 480 458 525 106 1.1 184
12 Portugal 476 465 486 131 1.0 99
13 Norway 447 423 564 106 1.3 180
14 Ireland 412 399 415 82 1.0 114
15 Greece 321 307 274 47 0.9 119
16 Finland 312 303 313 69 1.0 162
17 Luxembourg 85 73 131 22 1.5 46
18 Cyprus 49 48 57 10 1.2 29
19 Monaco 21 19 20 4 1.0 30
20 Malta 20 19 6 0 0.3 13
21 Iceland 18 18 14 1 0.8 39
22 Faroe Islands 12 12 26 11 2.2 20
23 Andorra 2 2 1 0 0.5 3
24 Gibraltar 1 1 0 0 0.0 2
Eastern Europe
1 Russian Federation 462 460 146 40 0.3 49
2 Poland 268 260 267 69 1.0 77
3 Czech Republic 166 163 98 23 0.6 65
4 Slovenia 92 90 170 26 1.9 65
5 Croatia 84 82 121 16 1.4 61
6 Serbia 77 75 44 5 0.6 45
7 Ukraine 72 70 14 5 0.2 17
8 Hungary 71 71 79 14 1.1 72
9 Lithuania 61 60 34 6 0.6 33
10 Bulgaria 49 47 25 2 0.5 27
11 Romania 48 48 114 12 2.4 29
12 Slovakia 37 37 29 1 0.8 28
13 Bosnia and Herzegovina 28 28 8 0 0.3 20
14 Estonia 22 22 37 2 1.7 49
15 Georgia 14 14 5 1 0.4 20
16 Macedonia 13 13 36 1 2.8 15
17 Latvia 13 13 15 1 1.2 12
18 Montenegro 9 9 6 0 0.7 13
19 Albania 7 7 40 2 5.7 8
20 Armenia 6 6 6 0 1.0 10
21 Belarus 6 6 0 0 0.0 10
22 Moldova 4 4 11 0 2.8 5
23 Azerbaijan 2 2 1 0 0.5 5

Amongst Western European countries, the maximum contributions were made by the United Kingdom (N = 51510), followed by Germany (N = 40627), France (N = 25877), Italy (N = 19062), and Spain (N = 17131) during the cumulative period of 1996–2022 (Table 3). In 2022, the United Kingdom continued to contribute maximally (N = 3339), followed by Germany (N = 2564), France (N = 1669), Spain (N = 1656), and Italy (N = 1564) (Table 4).

In the cumulative period of 1996–2022, Poland contributed maximally (N = 4049) among the Eastern European Countries, followed by the Russian Federation (N = 2791), and the Czech Republic (N = 2474). The lowest contribution was provided by Azerbaijan (N = 16) (Table 3). In 2022, the maximum contribution from the Eastern European countries came from the Russian Federation (N = 462), followed by Poland (N = 268), the Czech Republic (N = 166), and Azerbaijan continued to offer the lowest contribution (N = 2). (Table 4).

4

4 Discussion

Bibliometric analysis is a sensitive indicator used to quantitatively analyze scientific publications, showing the impact of a certain publication in a certain field. In orthopaedics and sports medicine, bibliometric analysis has been used to identify the most influential papers, authors, topics, countries, and universities from the 1950s–2020s. These studies provide valuable insights into the trends and impact of research in orthopaedics and sports medicine and can guide future research in these fields. In the present study, the European continent is the major contributor of publications related to orthopaedics and sports medicine worldwide and has contributed to around 1/3rd of the total publications in this field. The top European countries United Kingdom, Germany, France, and Spain have maintained their rank in the top ten nations over the cumulative period from 1996 to 2022. All top five countries (United Kingdom, Germany, France, Italy, and Spain) have shown an increasing trend of publications, year-wise since 1996, and the top three nations United Kingdom, Germany, and France have maintained their rankings on the European rank score. Italy counted in the global rank two places down from 9th to 11th in 2022 and Spain has recently taken over the 4th rank from Italy in publication numbers in European comparison. COVID-19 pandemic led to a decline in the annual publication rate for the first time in 20 years (2020–2021: 5.69 %).26 Differences in publication rate could be significantly associated with the respective Covid-19 case number (r = −0.77, p < 0.01).26 A decrease in the publication rate in the pandemic year 2021 was observed in almost all countries with some exceptions. Among the exceptions was Spain, which recorded an increase of +6.49 %.26

As with the other continents, Europe has a large wealth gap among its countries. The richer states tend to be in the Western, followed by Central, and Eastern Europe, with higher GDP (World Bank Data 2022, worldbank.org). The richer European nations have higher research outputs perhaps due to more funding and research facilities available to them. More international collaboration between European countries and globally is needed to enhance research outputs from Eastern European countries. The research output is less from economically weaker countries such as of Southeast Asia, where a large proportion (21 %) of the global population lives, with a meagre 1.45 % of the global.27 The research related to the health problems of Low-Middle-Income-Countries (LMIC) must address their local problems and find cost-effective treatments rather than relying on the results and recommendations derived from the research done in High-Income-countries (HIC), which may not be feasible and applicable to lesser affluent countries, such as Eastern Europe etc. COVID-19 has been a booster for the researcher as the number of publications rose significantly not only during the pandemic but have remained higher after the pandemic, as compared to the pre-pandemic period.28

Compared to previous analyses of orthopaedic academic outputs that focused on the total number of publications per country and used the Web of Science database, the present analysis is based on publications in Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine from the SCImago Journal & Country Rank database.14 Both Web of Science and Scopus databases use the same model of classification. However, the online database SCImago Journal & Country Rank, founded by Felix de Moya in 2007 accesses the significantly larger Scopus database thus it takes into account more journals.29,30 Furthermore, many journals are only indexed in Scopus.31 Another great advantage of this database is that it is free of charge.31,32

The five top publishing European countries when compared with the top five Asian countries in 2022 revealed that China was ahead of all of them with 4607 publications, followed by the UK (n = 3399), Germany (n = 2564), Japan (n = 2128), France (n = 1669), Spain (n = 1656), Italy (n = 1564), India (n = 999), South Korea (n = 993), and Taiwan (n = 292)14 (Supplementary Table 3).

This study has limitations to be considered. Published articles were presented as the number of articles published, and the quality of articles was not considered, although this should probably be assessed using bibliometric indicators such as Impact Factor (IF), Eigenfactor score (ES) Article Influence Score (AIS) or SCImago Journal Rank Indicator (SJR). Current bibliographic analysis continues to neglect influencing factors such as population size, economic discrepancies such as median household income, and the number of orthopaedic surgeons in a given regional area. Adjustment for these factors should result in more meaningful data.

5

5 Conclusion

The present bibliometric analysis examined European orthopaedic research trends published between 1996 and 2022. The findings highlight Europe's prominent role in orthopaedic research, accounting for nearly a third of global publications in this field. Notably, European nations claimed half of the top 10 publishing countries worldwide, with Western Europe leading the way compared to Eastern Europe. The United Kingdom stands out as the top contributor within Europe, both historically and in the most recent year analysed (2022).

Ethical statement

Not applicable.

Funding

No funding was received for this research.

Guardian/patient's consent

Not applicable.

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Raju Vaishya: data extraction and writing. Abhishek Vaish: data extraction and writing. Luise Schäfer: writing. Filippo Migliorini: writing, All authors have agreed to the final version to be published and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

References

  1. , , , . Using publication metrics to highlight academic productivity and research impact. Acad Emerg Med. Oct 2014;21(10):1160-1172.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. , , , et al . Worldwide research productivity in the field of arthroscopy: a bibliometric analysis. Arthroscopy. Aug 2015;31(8):1452-1457.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. , , , . Arthroplasty and global research output: a bibliometric analysis. J Orthop. Jan-Feb 2020;17:187-192.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. , , , , . Clinical excellence in academia: perspectives from masterful academic clinicians. Mayo Clin Proc. Sep 2008;83(9):989-994.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. , , , . International orthopaedic journals: a 15-year review. The J Bone and Joint Surg Br. 1998;80(1):6-7.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. , , , . Bibliometric analysis for medical research. Indian J Psychol Med. 2023;45(3):277-282.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. , , , et al . Interpreting bibliometric data. Front Res Metrics and Anal. 2021;30
    [Google Scholar]
  8. , , . The promises and pitfalls of evidence-based medicine. Health Aff. Jan-Feb 2005;24(1):18-28.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. , , , , , . Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't. BMJ. Jan 13 1996;312(7023):71-72.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. A new approach to teaching the practice of medicine. JAMA. Nov 4 1992;268(17):2420-2425.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. , , , , . Artificial Intelligence (AI) applications in orthopaedics: an innovative technology to embrace. J Clin Orthop Trauma. Feb 2020;11(Suppl 1):S80-S81.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. , , , , , , . Advances and innovations in total hip arthroplasty. SICOT J. 2021;7:26.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. , , , , , , . Micro RNA in meniscal ailments: current concepts. Br Med Bull. Apr 5 2023;145(1):141-150.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. , , , et al . Characteristics and trends of orthopedic publications between 2000 and 2009. Clin Orthop Surg. Sep 2011;3(3):225-229.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. , , , et al . Orthopedics research output from China, USA, UK, Japan, Germany and France: a 10-year survey of the literature. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. Nov 2016;102(7):939-945.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. , , , . Bibliometric analysis of the orthopedic literature. Orthopedics. Oct 1 2013;36(10):e1225-e1232.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. , , , . Worldwide orthopaedic research activity 2010-2014: publication rates in the top 15 orthopaedic journals related to population size and gross domestic product. World J Orthoped. Jun 18 2017;8(6):514-523.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. , , . The international rank order of publications in major clinical orthopaedic journals from 2000 to 2004. J Bone Joint Surg Br. Feb 2006;88(2):156-158.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. , , , , , . A bibliometric analysis of the top cited articles in sports and exercise medicine. Orthop J Sports Med. Jan 2021;9(1)
    [Google Scholar]
  20. , , , , , , . The 50 most-cited clinical articles in cartilage surgery research: a bibliometric analysis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. Jun 2022;30(6):1901-1914.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. , , , , , . Fifty most cited articles in orthopedic shoulder surgery. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2012;21(12):1796-1802.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. , , , , , . The top 100 cited articles in clinical orthopedic sports medicine. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2015;44(8):E252-E261.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. , , , , . Impact of Covid-19 on the global orthopaedic research output. Front Surg. 2022;9
    [Google Scholar]
  24. , , , , . Scientometric analysis of Indian Orthopaedic Research in the last two decades. Int Orthop. Nov 2022;46(11):2471-2481.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. , , , , , . Journal metrics of the top-ranked Orthopaedic, Medical, and Surgical journals - a cross-sectional, comparative study. Int Orthop Oct 18 2023
    [Google Scholar]
  26. , , , , . Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of science, and google scholar: strengths and weaknesses. Faseb J. Feb 2008;22(2):338-342.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. , , , . Comparison between impact factor, eigenfactor metrics, and SCimago journal rank indicator of pediatric neurology journals. Acta Inf Med. Apr 2014;22(2):103-106.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. , , , et al . A Comparison between Two Main Academic Literature Collections: Web of Science and Scopus Databases. 2013
    [Google Scholar]
  29. , . Web of science (WoS) and Scopus: the titans of bibliographic information in today's academic world. Publications. 2021;9(1):12.
    [Google Scholar]
Show Sections