Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Case Report
Clinical research study
Current Issue
Editorial Board
Literature Review
Narrative review
Original Article
Research Article
Review Article
Short Report
Surgical techniques
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Case Report
Clinical research study
Current Issue
Editorial Board
Literature Review
Narrative review
Original Article
Research Article
Review Article
Short Report
Surgical techniques
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

60 (); 1-9
doi:
10.1016/j.jor.2024.09.012

Postoperative laboratory testing in the era of outpatient total joint arthroplasty: Targeted patient selection and associated cost savings

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA

⁎Corresponding author: Atul F. Kamath. kamatha@ccf.org

Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Reed Elsevier India Pvt. Ltd. and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

Abstract

Abstract

With the advent of outpatient total joint arthroplasty (TJA), the days of routinely drawing postoperative labs (complete blood counts [CBCs] and metabolic panels [CMPs/BMPs]) to monitor for complications are behind us. However, there does exist a subset of at-risk patients that may benefit from diligent postoperative monitoring, though the circumstances under which labs should be ordered remains unclear and subject to surgeon discretion. A systematic review of the literature was therefore conducted to evaluate the utility of postoperative laboratory testing, approaches to targeted patient selection and associated cost-savings.

The PubMed, MEDLINE, EBSCOhost, and Google Scholar electronic databases were searched on August 17, 2023, to identify all studies published since January 1, 2000, that evaluated the role of postoperative lab testing in TJA. (PROSPERO study protocol registration: CRD42023437334). Articles were included if a full-text English manuscript was available and the study assessed the utility of routine postoperative labs in TJA. 19 studies were included comprising 34,166 procedures. The mean Methodological index for Nonrandomized Studies score was 18.2 ± 1.5.

Abnormal postoperative lab results were common and infrequently required clinical intervention. Among several identified risk factors for patients that may benefit from postoperative laboratory monitoring, preoperative lab values proved excellent discriminators of transfusion requirement and metabolite-associated intervention. Selective testing demonstrated the ability to generate substantial cost-savings.

Routine postoperative laboratory testing offers little clinical utility and produces unnecessary expenditures. Preoperative lab values offer the greatest predictive utility for postoperative transfusion requirement and metabolite-associated clinical intervention, with a preoperative hemoglobin threshold of 111.5 g/L offering an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.93 for predicting postoperative transfusion. Further investigations are needed for metabolic panel predictive models and should incorporate preoperative lab values. The refinement of such models can enable targeted patient selection to avoid unnecessary labs and generate substantial cost savings without compromising patient safety.

Keywords

Total joint arthroplasty
Postoperative laboratory testing
Complete blood counts
Metabolic panels
Complications
Cost containment
1

1 Introduction

Total joint arthroplasty (TJA) comprises one of the largest proportions of orthopaedic procedures, with the patient volume expected to continue to grow.1,2 With the growing demand for arthroplasty has come a concurrent emphasis on cutting costs without compromising the quality of care.2,3 The advent of outpatient TJA has provided an attractive means of such cost-containment.4 Driven by major advances in perioperative patient management, including the widespread utilization of tranexamic acid and multimodal analgesia, fast recovery protocols with same day discharge have become an increasing norm.5 However, with this shifting landscape has come considerations for patient safety, as surgeons face the challenge of anticipating postoperative complications and identifying patients who may require more diligent monitoring.

Historically, routine postoperative lab testing, including the ordering of complete blood counts (CBCs) and complete or basic metabolic panels (CMPs, BMPs), has been a mainstay in monitoring for postoperative complications.2,5–8 However, with the shift toward outpatient procedures, this practice is no longer commonplace. Recent studies have explored the safety of discarding of this once routine practice, overall finding that routine postoperative lab testing offers little clinical value to the majority of TJA patients, and that ample cost savings have been generated through their reduced use.9–15 Moreover, these authors sought to identify which patients may be at risk of postoperative complications and may therefore benefit from having labs drawn. While findings have varied, the evidence suggests that there are patients whom labs should be ordered for following TJA. However, with a lack of current consensus, it remains unclear when postoperative laboratory testing is most appropriate.

Therefore, a systematic review was conducted to evaluate the role of postoperative lab testing in the era of outpatient TJA. This review sought to explore the utility of postoperative labs in the era of outpatient TJA, approaches to targeted patient testing, and associated cost-implications.

2

2 Methods

2.1

2.1 Search strategy

On August 17, 2023, the PubMed, MEDLINE, EBSCOhost, and Google Scholar databases were queried to identify all studies published between January 1, 2000 and August 17, 2023 that evaluated the utility of routine postoperative blood testing following TJA. For our query, the following search term was utilized: ("Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip"[Mesh] OR "Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee"[Mesh] OR "Arthroplasty, Replacement"[Mesh] OR "total joint arthroplasty" OR "total knee arthroplasty" OR "total hip arthroplasty" OR "TJA'' OR "THA" OR "TKA") AND ("Hematologic Tests"[Mesh] OR "Blood Cell Count"[Mesh] OR "complete blood count" OR "CBC" OR "routine blood test∗" OR "Diagnostic Tests, Routine"[Mesh] OR "laboratory test∗" OR "postoperative test∗" OR "Value-Based Health Care"[Mesh]).

2.2

2.2 Eligibility criteria

For article inclusion, a full-text English manuscript must have been available, and the study must have investigated the utility of postoperative laboratory testing in TJA or assessed approaches to targeted testing. Articles were excluded for not fulfilling these inclusion criteria as well as all case reports, systematic reviews, duplicate studies among databases, abstracts, articles on pre-print servers, and non-English publications.

2.3

2.3 Study selection

The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines (PROSPERO registration of the study protocol: CRD42023437334, June 7, 2023) were followed for this investigation. To assess article eligibility, two independent reviewers (JRP, MSL) made initial inclusions and exclusions, with a third reviewer (CJH) helping attain consensus in the event of disagreements. 1189 unique articles were attained from the initial query after removing duplicates. 67 studies were eligible for a full-text screen following title and abstract screening. 19 studies met inclusion criteria after examining the full text. Additional review of references of included studies did not yield further articles (Fig. 1).

This PRISMA diagram depicts the selection process for article information.
Fig. 1 This PRISMA diagram depicts the selection process for article information.
2.4

2.4 Study characteristics

A total of 19 studies evaluating 34,166 TJA procedures (TKA: n = 23,066, 67.5 %; THA: n = 11,100, 32.5 %) were included in the final analysis (Table 1). Eight studies investigated the utility of both postoperative CBCs and BMP/CMPs,9–11,14,16–19 nine studies investigated only postoperative CBCs,12,13,20–26 and two studies investigated only postoperative BMPs.27,28 Nine studies reported results for both THA and TKA,16,18,20–22,24,26–28 while five studies reported results for only THA9,11,12,17,19 and five studies reported results for only TKA.10,13,14,23,25 The included studies were published between 2015 and 2023, with all being retrospective in design. All studies were conducted at single institutions analyzing patient data between January 2008 and December 2020 (see Table 2).

Table 1 Characteristics of studies included in the final analysis.
Study (Year) Design SampleSize Study Period Data Source Procedure(s) Lab Test(s) Evaluated Minors Score
Angerame et al. (2021)16 Retrospective Cohort 958 June 2016–Dec 2017 Single Institution TKA, THA CBC, BMP 18
Beckers et al. (2023)9 Retrospective Cohort 1000 June 2015–Oct 2020 Single Institution THA CBC, CMP 20
Garg et al. (2021)17 Retrospective Cohort 353 Jan 2014–Aug 2018 Single Institution THA CBC, BMP 19
Greco et al. (2019)18 Retrospective Cohort 1132 July 2016–Feb 2017 Single Institution TKA, THA CBC, BMP 17
Halawi et al. (2019)11 Retrospective Cohort 351 Jan 2015–July 2017 Single Institution THA CBC, BMP 18
Halawi et al. (2020)10 Retrospective Cohort 319 Jan 2015–July 2017 Single Institution TKA CBC, BMP 18
Li et al. (2022)14 Retrospective Cohort 713 Jan 2015–Dec 2020 Single Institution TKA CBC, CMP 17
Wu et al. (2020)19 Retrospective Cohort 395 Jan 2016–Nov 2018 Single Institution THA CBC, CMP 17
Dhiman et al. (2022)20 Retrospective Cohort 7280 Dec 2011–Aug 2018 Single Institution TKA, THA CBC 19
Gilde et al. (2021)21 Retrospective Cohort 1060 July 2017–July 2019 Single Institution TKA, THA CBC 21
Hennessy et al. (2020)22 Retrospective Cohort 136 Mar 2019–June 2019 Single Institution TKA, THA CBC 16
Howell et al. (2019)23 Retrospective Cohort 484 Jan 2012–Sept 2014 Single Institution TKA CBC 17
Jagow et al. (2015)24 Retrospective Cohort 318 Jan 2008–June 2011 Single Institution TKA, THA CBC 17
Kildow et al. (2018) CBC12 Retrospective Cohort 352 Jan 2012–Sept 2014 Single Institution THA CBC 18
Kolin et al. (2023)13 Retrospective Cohort 14,091 Feb 2016–Dec 2020 Single Institution TKA CBC 20
Mills et al. (2021)25 Retrospective Cohort 628 May 2016–May 2018 Single Institution TKA CBC 18
Mostello et al. (2020)26 Retrospective Cohort 108 Oct 2014–Sept 2017 Single Institution TKA, THA CBC 16
Kildow et al. (2018) BMP27 Retrospective Cohort 767 Jan 2012–Sept 2014 Single Institution TKA, THA BMP 21
Tischler et al. (2021)28 Retrospective Cohort 3721 Jan 2015–Dec 2017 Single Institution TKA, THA BMP 19
Table 2 The utility of complete blood counts.
Study (Year) Sample Size Patients with Preoperative Anemia Patients with Postoperative Anemia Patients Requiring Transfusion Complications Follow-up Period
Angerame et al. (2021)16 958 251 (26.2 %) 851 (88.9 %) 14 (1.5 %) n/a n/a
Beckers et al. (2023)9 1000 216 (21.6 %) 903 (9.0 %) 23 (2.3 %) n/a 90 days
Dhiman et al. (2022)20 7280 2422 (33.3 %) 6554 (90.0 %) 385 (5.3 %) n/a n/a
Mills et al. (2019)25 628 26 (4.1 %) 390 (62.1 %) 1 (0.2 %) n/a 90 days
Wu et al. (2020)19 395 104 (26.3 %) 307 (77.7 %) 7 (1.8 %) n/a n/a
Halawi et al. (2019)11 351 61 (17.4 %) n/a 8 (2.3 %) 7 (2.0 %)All AKI 90 days
Halawi et al. (2020)10 319 84 (26.2 %) n/a 3 (0.9 %) 12 (3.8 %)All AKI 90 days
Hennessy et al. (2020)22 136 n/a 8 (5.9 %) 5 (3.7 %) n/a n/a
Howell et al. (2019)23 484 n/a 74 (15.3 %) 25 (5.2 %) 25 (5.2 %) 90 days
Kildow et al. (2018) CBC12 352 n/a 115 (32.7 %) 54 (15.3 %) 11 (3.1 %) 90 days
Kolin et al. (2023)13 14,091 n/a 2311 (16.4 %) 543 (3.9 %) n/a n/a
Li et al. (2022)14 713a n/a 683 (95.8 %) 55 (7.7 %) n/a n/a
Garg et al. (2021)17 353 n/a n/a 4 (1.1 %) n/a n/a
Gilde et al. (2021)21 1060 n/a n/a 7 (0.7 %) n/a 90 days
Greco et al. (2019)18 1132 n/a n/a 12 (0.1 %) n/a n/a
Jagow et al. (2015)24 318 n/a n/a 89 (28.0 %) n/a n/a
Mostello et al. (2020)26 108 n/a n/a 9 (8.3 %) n/a 30 days
Sample size comprised strictly of patients with abnormal postoperative labs (includes CBCs and CMPs).
2.5

2.5 Risk of bias in individual studies

The Methodological Index for Nonrandomized Studies (MINORS) tool was utilized to assess for risk of bias in this investigation 33. This previously validated tool rates comparative studies on a scale from 0 to 24 with higher scores representing a greater quality study. 12 criteria related to study design, outcomes, and follow-up were rated 0 if not reported, 1 if reported but inadequate, and 2 if reported and adequate by two reviewers (JRP, MSL). Scoring differences were resolved with consensus from a third reviewer (CJH). The mean MINORS score was 18.2 ± 1.5.

2.6

2.6 Data extraction and analysis

The selected studies were analyzed for their study design, types of routine postoperative laboratory tests (CBCs, CMPs/BMPs), and outcomes associated with these tests. To assess the utility of postoperative labs, we gathered data on the frequency of abnormal preoperative and postoperative lab values, clinical interventions, and complications. Additionally, we examined predictors of abnormal test results or associated clinical interventions, as well as cost information for routine testing. Data extraction was conducted by two reviewers (JRP, MSL) who created a collaborative spreadsheet in duplicate. The results were compared for accuracy. Due to the variability in study designs, a meta-analysis was not feasible, so a narrative summary of the findings was presented.

3

3 Results

3.1

3.1 The utility of CBCs and BMPs/CMPs

Seven studies reported frequency of preoperative anemia, with an average of 28.9 % (4.1–33.3 %).9–11,16,20,25,26 Nine studies reported overall frequency of postoperative anemia, with an average of 46.8 % (5.9–90.0 %) across studies.9,12,13,16,20,22,23,25,26 One remaining study showed that of patients who had at least one abnormal lab value (CBC or CMP), 95.8 % of them had postoperative anemia.14 All seventeen studies reported the incidence of postoperative transfusion, with an average frequency of 4.2 % (0.1–28.0 %) across studies. Four studies reported rates of 90-day complications. Two of these studies assessed a broad scope of postoperative complications and reported a mean complication rate of 4.3 % (3.1–5.2 %).12,23 The remaining two studies specifically evaluated the frequency of postoperative acute kidney injury (AKI), with an average frequency of 2.8 % (2.0–3.8 %) between studies.10,11

Two studies reported the frequency of preoperative electrolyte abnormalities (sodium and potassium) and showed an average frequency of 9 % (7.1–9.0 %).19,28 All nine studies reported on the frequency of abnormal postoperative electrolyte values, with all but one reporting both sodium and potassium abnormalities. Across those eight studies, the average combined frequency of postoperative sodium and potassium abnormalities was 28.6 % (6.8–66.5 %).9–11,14,16,19,27,28 The one remaining study evaluated potassium values only and found that 15.5 % of patients experienced abnormal lab results.18 Eight studies reported on electrolyte-related postoperative clinical interventions in the form of electrolyte supplementations, with seven of them including both sodium and potassium-related intervention. Those seven studies showed that on average, 7.0 % (0.7–14.2 %) of patients required clinical intervention due to abnormal electrolytes.3,9,11,14,16,27,28 The one remaining study strictly assessed potassium-related interventions and reported that 15.5 % of all patients required postoperative clinical intervention, which meant all patients with abnormal potassium values received intervention.18

3.2

3.2 Predictors of abnormal postoperative laboratory tests and clinical intervention

Eight studies identified predictors of postoperative anemia and subsequent transfusion (Table 4).10,11,16–19,24,25 The most frequently noted predictors of abnormal postoperative CBCs and transfusions were preoperative Hb (13 studies, n = 26,722), increasing age (8, n = 18,444), lack of TXA use (6, n = 16,657), female sex (6, n = 16,928), low BMI (5, n = 17,031), operative time (5, n = 16,815), ASA score (4, n = 15,114), intraoperative blood loss (3, n = 2196), diabetes mellitus (2, n = 670), chronic kidney disease (2, n = 1277), and postoperative day one (POD1) Hb (1, n = 108) (see Table 3). One study found that there was no difference mean drop in Hb between anterior and posterior approaches to hip (2.12 g/dL vs. 2.24 g/dL, p = 0.59).17 Another study found no difference between the direct anterior approach and the Rottinger approach to the hip in need for transfusion (p = 0.77).9 Nine studies which identified predictors developed predictive models for transfusion, either using an individual factor or a multitude.9,12–14,19,20,23,25,26 Preoperative Hb and POD1 Hb were excellent discriminators of transfusion with maximum area under the curves (AUCs) of 0.933 and 0.943, respectively.14 However, preoperative Hb outperformed POD1 Hb in terms of specificity.26 The transfusion models with multiple predictors for decision-making were able to achieve sensitivities of 64–96.5 %, specificities of 40–87 %, and AUCs of 0.802–0.92 (see Table 5).

Table 3 The utility of complete and basic metabolic panels.
Study (Year) Sample Size Patients with Abnormal Preoperative Na or K Patients with Abnormal Postoperative Na or K Patients Requiring Clinical Intervention
Tischler et al. (2021)28 3721 342 (9.2 %) 1116 (30.0 %) 293 (7.9 %)
Wu et al. (2020)19 396 28 (7.1 %) 27 (6.8 %) 6 (1.5 %)
Angerame et al. (2021)16 958 n/a 132 (13.8 %) 8 (0.8 %)
Beckers et al. (2023)9 1000 n/a 162 (16.2 %) 7 (0.7 %)
Greco et al. (2019)b,18 1132 n/a 176 (15.5 %) 176 (15.5 %)
Halawi et al. (2019)11 351 n/a 61 (17.4 %) 3 (0.9 %)
Kildow et al. (2018) BMP27 767 n/a 510 (66.5 %) 109 (14.2 %)
Li et al. (2022)14 713a n/a 273 (38.3 %) 24 (3.4 %)
Halawi et al. (2020)10 319 n/a 69 (21.6 %) n/a
Sample size comprised strictly of patients with abnormal postoperative labs (includes CBCs and CMPs).
Study evaluated potassium values only; did not include sodium.
Table 4 Predictors of abnormal complete blood counts and transfusion.
Study (Year) How were Predictors for Anemia-Related Complications Identified? Identified Predictors for Anemia-Related Complications Predictive Model ± Results
Beckers et al. (2023)9 Multivariate Logistic Regression Preoperative Hb, age, female, osteonecrosis A multivariable regression equation which accounted for age, gender, surgical indication, hypertension, and preoperative Hb was developed with a cutoff for a postoperative lab test.Sen. = 96.65 %, Sp. = 75.54 %, AUC = 0.92
Dhiman et al. (2022)20 Multivariate Logistic Regression Preoperative Hb Decision curve analysis showed that testing patients according to risk of postoperative anemia with logistic regression was superior to testing all patients, testing no patients, and testing only patients with preoperative anemia.
Gilde et al. (2021)21 Multivariate Logistic Regression Topical TXA, BMI <25, BMI 25–30, THA n/a
Howell et al. (2019)23 Multivariate Logistic Regression Age >70, no TXA use, operative time Hb on POD1 of <9.9 g/dL with risk factors and <7.4 g/dL without risk:Sen. = 64.3 %, Sp. = 82.9 %, AUC = 0.8019 for transfusion after POD1
Kildow et al. (2018) CBC12 Multivariate Logistic Regression Preoperative Hb, age, no TXA use, female, operative time Hb on POD1 < 11.94 g/dL with risk factors and <7.03 g/dL without risk factors:Sen. = 95.8 %, Sp. = 72.8 % for transfusion after POD1
Kolin et al. (2023)13 Multivariate Logistic Regression Preoperative Hb, age, TXA dose, female, BMI, operative time, ASA score, drain use Logistic regression was utilized to derive postoperative anemia and transfusion probability equations using age, sex, BMI, preoperative Hb, TXA dose, ASA level, operative time and drain use.Postoperative Anemia: Probability Cutoff = 14 %, Sen. = 83 %, Sp. = 77 %, AUC = 0.88Transfusion: Probability Cutoff = 6 %, Sen. = 78 %, Sp. = 87 %, AUC = 0.90
Mostello et al. (2020)26 Multivariate Logistic Regression Preoperative Hb, POD1 Hb Preoperative Hb ≤ 12.5 g/dL: Sen. = 88.9 %, Sp. = 73.7 %, AUC = 0.845 for transfusionPOD1 Hb value ≤ 10 g/dL:Sen. = 100 %, Sp. = 68.7 %, AUC: 0.943 for transfusion
Li et al. (2022)14 Binary Logistic Regression Preoperative Hb, age, intraoperative blood loss For transfusion,Age- 69.5 years:Sen. = 87.9 %, Sp. = 61.3 %, AUC = 0.767Estimated blood loss-225 mL:Sen. = 77.6 %, Sp. 75.7 %, AUC = 0.839Preoperative Hb level-111.5 g/LSen. = 91.9 %, Sp. = 86.2 %, AUC = 0.933
Mills et al. (2021)25 Prevalence Calculations Preoperative Hb According to this algorithm, only patients with preoperative anemia or symptoms of anemia should receive a postoperative CBC.Unvalidated
Wu et al. (2020)19 Prevalence Calculations Preoperative Hb, low BMI, operative time A risk-scoring system was created to predict transfusion based on Hb level, ASA score, operation time, and perioperative TXA use.Validated in Beckers et al., 2023:Sen. = 86.5 %, Sp. = 40 %
Angerame et al. (2021)16 Prevalence Calculations CKD, CHF, hematologic conditions, neoplastic conditions, vascular conditions n/a
Garg et al. (2021)17 Prevalence Calculations Preoperative Hb, age, female, low BMI (<25), ASA grade >2 n/a
Greco et al. (2019)18 Prevalence Calculations Preoperative Hb, age, female, low BMI, operative time, intraoperative blood loss n/a
Halawi et al. (2019)11 Prevalence Calculations Preoperative Hb, no TXA use, ASA score >3, intraoperative blood loss >250 mL, diabetes mellitus n/a
Halawi et al. (2020)10 Prevalence Calculations Preoperative Hb, age >65, no TXA use, ASA score >3, diabetes mellitus, CKD, BMI >35, heart disease n/a
Table 5 Predictors of abnormal metabolic panels and associated clinical interventions.
Study (Year) How were Predictors for Metabolite-Related Complications Identified? Identified Predictors for Metabolite-Related Complications Predictive Model and Results
Beckers et al. (2023)9 Multivariate Logistic Regression None due to low rates of intervention n/a
Halawi et al. (2019)11 Multivariate Logistic Regression Preoperative metabolite levels, no TXA use n/a
Halawi et al. (2020)10 Multivariate Logistic Regression Preoperative metabolite levels n/a
Kildow et al. (2018) BMP27 Multivariate Logistic Regression Preoperative metabolite levels, diabetes mellitus, sex, CKD, age n/a
Tischler et al. (2021)28 Multivariate Logistic Regression Preoperative metabolite levels, diabetes mellitus, thiazide diuretics, loop diuretics, K sparing diuretics, and renal disease n/a
Li et al. (2022)14 Binary Logistic Regression Preoperative metabolite levels, operative time, intraoperative blood loss, BMI For albumin supplementation,
Blood loss-225 mL:
Sen. = 77.6 %, Sp. = 75.7, AUC = 0.849
Operative time-152.5 min: Sen. = 63.8 %, Sp. = 69.6 %, AUC = 0.696
Preoperative albumin-42.85 g/L: Sen. = 43.8 %, Sp. = 74.1 %, AUC = 0.592
For potassium supplementation,
BMI- 21.89 kg/m2:
Sen. = 73.9 %, Sp. = 83.3 %, AUC = 0.793
Preoperative potassium-3.68 g/L: Sen. = 93.8 %, Sp. = 75 %, AUC = 0.912
Angerame et al. (2021)16 Prevalence Calculations Diabetes mellitus, CHF, vascular or hematologic conditions, and GI conditions n/a
Greco et al. (2019)18 Prevalence Calculations Preoperative metabolite levels, CKD, cardiovascular disease, cardiopulmonary disease, renal disease, preoperative anemia n/a
Wu et al. (2020)19 Prevalence Calculations Preoperative metabolite levels, sex, operative time n/a

Nine studies identified predictors of abnormal postoperative BMP/CMPs as well as subsequent fluid boluses and electrolyte infusions.9–11,14,16,18,19,27,28 The most frequently noted predictors of abnormal postoperative CBCs and transfusions were preoperative metabolite levels (7 studies, n = 6839), diabetes mellitus (3, n = 4887), sex (2, n = 1162), CKD (2, n = 1899), and operative time (2, n = 1108). Additionally, one study found Black race to be associated with greater risk for abnormal postoperative potassium (Odds Ratio [OR]: 1.38, 95 % Confidence Interval [CI]: 1.05–1.82) and blood urea nitrogen (OR: 1.85, 95 % CI: 1.04–3.27) following TJA in comparison to White race.28 One study which identified predictors was able to test the predictive power of risk factors for albumin and potassium supplementation.14 Blood loss and preoperative potassium achieved the highest sensitivities, specificities, and AUCs for albumin and potassium supplementation, respectively.

3.3

3.3 Costs associated with postoperative laboratory testing

Studies reported between 1.74 and 3.3 postoperative labs administered per patient (Table 6).12,21,23,26,27 However, there was a difference in the number of tests for patients not requiring intervention (2.8–2.9 tests) compared to those who did (5.6–5.7 tests).12,23,27 Furthermore, two studies found that a large proportion (92–97.21 %) of postoperative testing was performed on patients with normal preoperative labs.21,26 Two studies estimated that 56–97 % of postoperative testing costs could have been saved if testing was limited to patients with abnormal preoperative values.25,26 Additionally, patient selection algorithms utilizing other predictors of clinical intervention were estimated to create substantial savings for institutions.9,17 Approximately $300 per patient was spent on CBC testing for patients who did not receive a transfusion12,23 and approximately $850 per patient was spent on BMPs for patients who did not receive medical intervention.27

Table 6 The cost of routine postoperative laboratory testing.
Study (Year) Average Number of Tests per Patient Average Number of Tests per Patient Not Requiring Intervention Average Number of Tests per Patient Requiring Intervention Proportion of Tests for Normal Preoperative Laboratory Value Estimated Potential Savings
Beckers et al. (2023)9 n/a n/a n/a n/a The use of the THABUS formula developed in this study would have led to only 261/1000 patients receiving postoperative CBCs. This would be reflected in a cost savings of $32,132 over the study period of 5 years.
Garg et al. (2021)17 n/a n/a n/a n/a In this cohort of 140 with age <70 and ASA 1/2 were not tested, a potential cost saving of 2800 pounds over the study period between June 2014 and August 2018 could have been made on CBC and BMP tests.
Gilde et al. (2021)21 1.74 CBCs n/a n/a 92 % n/a
Howell et al. 201923 3.0 CBCs 2.9 CBCs 5.7 CBCs n/a $316.10 per patient was spent on CBC testing for patients who did not receive a subsequent transfusion ($144,773).
Kildow et al. (2018) CBC12 3.3 CBCs 2.8 ± 1.1 CBCs 5.6 ± 3.9 CBCs n/a Patients who did not receive medical intervention incurred a total charge of $90,949.60 ($305.20/patient) and were reimbursed $7401.13 ($24.84/patient) from January 2012 to September 2014.
Kildow et al. (2018) BMP27 3.3 BMPs 2.8 BMPs 5.6 BMPs n/a A total of $472,372.56 ($837.54/patient) was charged on patients who did not receive medical intervention between January 2012 and September 2014.
Mills et al. (2021)25 n/a n/a n/a n/a If postoperative CBC testing was only done on patients with preoperative anemia, total charges would be 2.71 % of realized costs, a 97 % cost reduction compared to current standard practice over the two-year study period.
Mostello et al. (2020)26 2.3 CBCs and 1.3 CBCs after POD1 n/a n/a 97.21 % Based on the CMS Fee Schedule of $10.66, a savings of $845 (56 %) over the three-year study period could have been generated for the healthcare system if the 61 patients with preoperative Hb greater than 12.5 g/dL and POD1 Hb greater than 10.0 g/dL did not receive a CBC following POD1.
4

4 Discussion

As the field of arthroplasty continues to undergo rapidly evolving changes, surgeons are faced with novel considerations and challenges. Outpatient total joint arthroplasty has quickly become a popular avenue for cost containment and is a growing practice; however, anticipating and preventing postoperative complications presents a notable challenge. While routine postoperative lab testing was historically a critical component of monitoring for patient complications, this practice has fallen out of favor with evolving rapid recovery protocols. This review aimed to evaluate the utility of postoperative lab testing in the era of outpatient TJA, identify approaches to targeted testing, and explore the associated cost implications. Overall, this review found that routine postoperative laboratory testing is costly and unnecessary for the majority of patients undergoing TJA. However, patients may be risk-stratified based on demographic and perioperative information to enable a selective approach to testing, with varying approaches being taken across institutions. The studies which evaluated the cost-implications of targeted testing unanimously reported significant savings, highlighting a substantial opportunity for cost-containment for the national healthcare system given the growing volume of patients undergoing TJA.

4.1

4.1 The utility of CBCs and BMP/CMPs

This review found that routine postoperative lab testing holds little clinical utility for most patients undergoing TJA, which is supported by high rates of abnormal postoperative labs and coinciding low rates of clinical intervention across the analyzed studies. On average, the best available evidence showed that nearly half of patients experience an abnormal CBC postoperatively; however, only a fraction of these patients, typically <5 %, require transfusion. These low rates of transfusion and associated complications are partly attributable to the advent of tranexamic acid, with studies reporting transfusion rates of 0–8.1 % for TJA procedures over the past decade.29–31 Similarly, recent studies assessing the utility of postoperative CBCs and BMPs in partial knee, partial hip, and shoulder arthroplasty concluded that the labs were frequently unnecessary and not cost-effective.8,32–35 As advances in perioperative management continue to allow for fewer postoperative complications, these tests will continue to become increasingly inconsequential for the average patient. However, as this review showed that roughly 4 % of patients still require blood or metabolite-associated clinical intervention postoperatively, there is still value in laboratory testing for a small subset of patients. Thus, a selective approach to testing is an important step toward removing the undue burden of testing for patients and the overall healthcare system alike.

4.2

4.2 Predictors of abnormal postoperative laboratory tests and clinical intervention

Among the identified predictors for transfusion requirement such as age, sex, BMI, operative time, and ASA score, abnormal preoperative lab values were shown to offer the greatest predictive power across several studies. Of these studies, Li et al.14 performed a binary logistic regression that attained the highest AUC across analyses, with a threshold preoperative hemoglobin (Hb) level of 111.5 g/L providing a sensitivity of 91.9 %, specificity of 86.2 %, and AUC of 0.93 for predicting postoperative transfusion requirement. Utilizing this preoperative threshold in tandem with a surgeon's clinical discretion may offer even greater sensitivity, offering a straightforward means of determining which patients should have a postoperative CBC drawn. One study was able to attain a higher sensitivity at the sacrifice of a small degree of specificity, as Beckers et al.9 utilized a multivariable regression equation which accounted for age, gender, surgical indication, hypertension, and preoperative Hb, resulting in a sensitivity of 96.7 %, specificity of 75.5 %, and AUC of 0.92. While the moderate sacrifice in terms of specificity may well be worth the added emphasis on patient safety, this multivariate predictive model requires far more datapoints than the simple 111.5 g/L preoperative Hb threshold used by Li et al., rendering the latter the likely more enticing option. The orthopaedic literature supports the significance of these predictors, especially that of abnormal preoperative values, in the settings of hip fracture repair, lumbar spine surgery, high tibial osteotomy, and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.6,7,15,32 While the utilization of preoperative lab value thresholds can offer a quick and easy means of patient risk-stratification, future studies will be needed to assess the generalizability of the results of the most effective predictive models. More research is also warranted to understand factors such as race and surgical approach. As no current model offers a 100 % sensitivity, there remains a need for surgeon discretion with the use of any approach, as to tend to patients that might otherwise be overlooked.

4.3

4.3 Costs associated with postoperative laboratory testing

Routine postoperative testing was shown to lead to unnecessary expenditures for a large proportion of patients due to a lack of risk factors and need for clinical intervention. Approximately 3 tests were performed on patients who didn't receive any intervention and based on the costs of $14.39 per CMP and $6.79 per CBC in Angerame et al.,16 hospitals could save approximately $21 to $42 per patient if only the patients who required clinical intervention could be isolated for testing. These modest patient-level savings are magnified for the healthcare system, as Philips et al.2 reported billing $233.10 per CBC and $569.95 per BMP. After instituting their intervention prospectively, they were able to generate $568,000 of savings within a seven-month period. Additionally, limiting testing to those patients who will require an intervention prevents delayed discharge due to abnormal test results, another national driver of TJA cost.36–38 Kraus et al.39 found that keeping patients overnight for abnormal CBCs and BMPs was not cost effective and provided little value. While there are no current clinical guidelines for routine postoperative laboratory testing, we recommend testing for patients with abnormal pre-operative lab values, increased age, high ASA score, high intraoperative blood loss, diabetes, and CKD. In tandem with strict adherence to clinical guidelines for transfusion40,41 and IV electrolyte correction,41,42 targeted testing can provide cost savings both directly through reduced expenditure of testing resources and indirectly by avoiding unnecessary prolongation of care episodes that can result from routine laboratory testing while maintaining patient safety.

4.4

4.4 Limitations

This study is not without limitations. First, the retrospective nature of each of the included studies confers a higher risk of bias given limited controls. Second, heterogeneity among studies prevented meta-analysis and led to exclusion of certain outcomes assessed in individual studies included in this review. The authors selected outcomes based on consistency across the included studies as well as their own clinical discretion. Additionally, the analysis was limited to routine postoperative labs (CBCs, CMPs/BMPs). As such, the utility and ideal patient selection for non-routine tests such as C-reactive protein, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, blood cultures, and coagulation studies were not detailed in this investigation. Lastly, varying perioperative care procedures across studies may limit the generalizability any one particular finding. These variations include heterogeneous transfusion thresholds, surgical approaches, proportion of inpatient and outpatient procedures, and use of perioperative prophylactics. Also, TJA patients may have comorbidities which require frequent postoperative laboratory testing, in which discussion of optimal testing protocols for these patients are not discussed in this review or any included studies. These patients require appropriate care based on clinical discretion. Nonetheless, there were a number of consistencies in findings across studies that are encouraging for the generalizability and clinical application of these results.

5

5 Conclusion

Postoperative laboratory testing holds little utility for the majority of patients undergoing TJA, as abnormal results are common and seldom require clinical intervention. However, several predictors have been identified for postoperative complications that can help delineate which patients may benefit from postoperative laboratory testing, with preoperative lab values consistently shown to offer the greatest predictive utility. While several of the analyzed predictive models were multifactorial, a simple preoperative hemoglobin threshold of 111.5 g/L appears most effective for predicting postoperative transfusion requirement, offering a sensitivity of 91.9 %, specificity of 86.2 %, and AUC of 0.93. Such an approach can enable a simple means of targeted patient selection for CBCs, though the use of such algorithms should accompany surgeon discretion and will require future investigation to assess for generalizability. For metabolic panels, only one study devised a model to predict the need for metabolite-associated clinical intervention. Further investigations into predictive algorithms for metabolic complications are needed and should prioritize preoperative lab values. Refining our approach to targeted patient selection can enable surgeons to avoid unnecessary labs without compromising patient safety, ultimately generating substantial cost savings.

Conflict of interest

A.F.K. reports the following disclosures: research support (Signature Orthopaedics), paid presenter or speaker (Zimmer Biomet), paid consultant (Zimmer Biomet), stock or stock options (Zimmer Biomet, Johnson & Johnson, and Procter & Gamble), IP royalties (Innomed), and board or committee member (AAOS, AAHKS, and Anterior Hip Foundation). JRP, MSL, CJH, MRG, and AJA have nothing to disclose.

Ethical committee approval

Ethical approval was waived as our analysis does not contain human data.

Study location

This study was performed at Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH.

Registration

PROSPERO registration of the study protocol: CRD42023437334, June 17, 2023.

Funding statement

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Guardian/patient's consent

This study did not require guardian/patient consent.

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Joshua R. Porto: Conceptualization, Methodology, Software, Validation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Resources, Data curation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing, Visualization. Monish S. Lavu: Conceptualization, Methodology, Software, Validation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Resources, Data curation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing, Visualization. Christian J. Hecht: Conceptualization, Methodology, Software, Validation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Resources, Data curation, Writing – original draft, and, Writing – review & editing, Visualization. Maura R. Guyler: Conceptualization, Methodology, Software, Validation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Resources, Data curation, Writing – original draft, and, Writing – review & editing, Visualization. Alexander J. Acuña: Conceptualization, Methodology, Software, Validation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Resources, Data curation, Writing – original draft, and, Writing – review & editing, Visualization. Atul F. Kamath: Conceptualization, Methodology, Software, Validation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Resources, Data curation, Writing – original draft, and, Writing – review & editing, Visualization, Project administration, Supervision.

References

  1. , , , , , , . Preoperative laboratory testing for total hip arthroplasty: unnecessary tests or a helpful prognosticator. J Orthop Sci. 2020;25(5):854-860.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. , , , et al . Routine laboratory tests are not necessary after primary total joint arthroplasty: a prospective study utilizing a selective algorithmic approach. J Arthroplasty. 2022;37(9):1731-1736.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. , , , , . Tranexamic acid benefits total joint arthroplasty patients regardless of preoperative hemoglobin value. J Arthroplasty. 2015;30(12):2098-2101.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. , , , et al . Outcomes and cost analysis of a surgical care unit for outpatient total joint arthroplasties performed at a tertiary academic center. Arthroplast Today. 2022;18:119-124.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. , , , . Outpatient total joint arthroplasty. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2017;10(4):567-574.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. , , , , , . Re-evaluating the necessity of routine laboratory tests after high tibial osteotomy surgery. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021;22(1)
    [Google Scholar]
  7. , , , et al . Are routine postoperative laboratory tests really necessary after lumbar spinal surgery? World Neurosurg. 2019;124:e748-e754.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. , , , et al . Routine postoperative laboratory tests are unnecessary after primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2020;29(8):1656-1664.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. , , , et al . How to avoid systematic postoperative blood test after total hip arthroplasty: a new risk scoring system compared to Wu's score. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2023
    [Google Scholar]
  10. , , , . Re-evaluating the utility of routine postoperative laboratory tests after primary total knee arthroplasty. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2020;11(Suppl 2):S219-S222.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. , , , . Routine postoperative laboratory tests are not necessary after primary total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2019;34(3):538-541.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. , , , et al . When should complete blood count tests Be performed in primary total hip arthroplasty patients? J Arthroplasty. 2018;33(10):3211-3214.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. , , , , , , . Predicting postoperative anemia and blood transfusion following total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2023;38(7):1262-1266.e2.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. , , , et al . The role of routine laboratory tests after unilateral total knee arthroplasty. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022;23(1)
    [Google Scholar]
  15. , , , , , , . The necessity of routine postoperative laboratory tests after total hip arthroplasty for hip fracture in a semi-urgent clinical setting. J Orthop Traumatol. 2020;21(1)
    [Google Scholar]
  16. , , , , , , . Usefulness of perioperative laboratory tests in total hip and knee arthroplasty: are they necessary for all patients? Arthroplast Today. 2021;7:136-142.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. , , , , , , . Routine postoperative blood tests in all patients undergoing Total Hip Arthroplasty as part of an enhanced recovery pathway: are they necessary? J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2021;16:114-118.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. , , , , , , . Should postoperative haemoglobin and potassium levels be checked routinely following blood-conserving primary total joint arthroplasty? Bone Joint Lett J. 2019;101-B(1_Supple_A):25-31.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. , , , , , , . Are routine postoperative laboratory tests necessary after primary total hip arthroplasty? J Arthroplasty. 2020;35(10):2892-2898.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. , , , et al . Utility of pre-operative haemoglobin concentration to guide peri-operative blood tests for hip and knee arthroplasty: a decision curve analysis. Transfus Med. 2022;32(4):306-317.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. , , , , . Routine postoperative complete blood counts are not necessary after most primary total hip and knee arthroplasties. J Arthroplasty. 2021;36(4):1257-1261.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. , , . Is routine hemoglobin monitoring necessary after elective hip and knee arthroplasty? Arthroplast Today. 2020;6(4):803-806.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. , , , et al . Clinical impact of routine complete blood counts following total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2019;34(7):S168-S172.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. , , , . Complete blood count before and after total hip or knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Surg. 2015;23(2):209-212.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. , , , . The utility of obtaining a complete blood count after total knee arthroplasty in the era of tranexamic acid. Orthopedics. 2020;44(1):E26-E30.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. , , , , . Daily postoperative complete blood counts after primary total joint arthroplasty may not always Be necessary. Orthopedics. 2020;43(1):e31-e36.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. , , , et al . The utility of basic metabolic panel tests after total joint arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2018;33(9):2752-2758.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. , , , , . Routine postoperative chemistry panels are not necessary for most total joint arthroplasty patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2021;103(11):968-976.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. , , , et al . Perioperative blood transfusions in hip and knee arthroplasty: a retrospective assessment of combined risk factors. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2022;142(8):1817-1822.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. , , , , , . Topical intra-articular compared with intravenous tranexamic acid to reduce blood loss in primary total knee replacement: a double-blind, randomized, controlled, noninferiority clinical trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014;96(23):1937-1944.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. , , , et al . Preoperative haemoglobin cut-off values for the prediction of post-operative transfusion in total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016;24(10):3293-3298.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. , , , , . Routine postoperative laboratory tests are not required in patients undergoing elective total shoulder arthroplasty. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2021;103(10):757-761.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. , , , , . Should we routinely perform a post-operative hemoglobin check following unicompartmental knee arthroplasty? Knee. 2020;27(1):249-256.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. , , , , , , . Routine postoperative laboratory tests are unnecessary after partial knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2016;31(12):2764-2767.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. , , , et al . The role of routine postoperative laboratory tests following hip hemiarthroplasty for an elderly femoral neck fracture. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021;22(1)
    [Google Scholar]
  36. , , , , , . Prevalence, risk factors, and complications associated with hyponatraemia following elective primary hip and knee arthroplasty. Perioper Med (Lond).. 2021;10(1)
    [Google Scholar]
  37. , , , , , , . Why still in hospital after fast-track hip and knee arthroplasty? Acta Orthop. 2011;82(6):679-684.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. , , , , . Effects of the length of stay on the cost of total knee and total hip arthroplasty from 2002 to 2013. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017;99(5):402-407.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. , , , , , . Is there benefit in keeping early discharge patients overnight after total joint arthroplasty? J Arthroplasty. 2021;36(1):24-29.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. , , , , , , . Minimizing blood transfusion in total hip and knee arthroplasty through a multimodal approach. J Arthroplasty. 2016;31(2):378-382.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. , , , et al . Consensus statement for perioperative care in total hip replacement and total knee replacement surgery: enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS®) Society recommendations. Acta Orthop. 2020;91(1):3-19.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. , , , , , , . Liberal versus restrictive fluid management in knee arthroplasty: a randomized, double-blind study. Anesth Analg. 2007;105(2):465-474.
    [Google Scholar]
Show Sections