Translate this page into:
Opening-wedge V-shaped corrective osteotomy for malunited fractures of metacarpal bones
∗Corresponding author: Alexandr N. Bratiichuk. brat59@bk.ru
-
Received: ,
Accepted: ,
This article was originally published by Reed Elsevier India Pvt. Ltd. and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.
Abstract
Abstract
Currently, the most commonly used method of treatment of patients with fractures of the metacarpal bones is closed reposition with immobilization of short-arm cast. This often leads to dislocation of fragments, their malunion, which leads to wrist functionality disorders and reduces the quality of patients’ life. The main way to eliminate the deformities ‒ osteotomy of the metacarpal bones, followed by osteosynthesis. Purpose of the study ‒ to give a clinical assessment of the results of surgical treatment of patients with posttraumatic deformities of the Metacarpals, based on the use of a new method of corrective osteotomy. Methods. The proposed new method V-shape open angle of the osteotomy of the metacarpal bones whit malunion, followed by subsequent fixation of mini-plates (RF Patent for the invention No. 2651893 from February 20, 2017). The long-term results (in one year) of treatment of five operated patients with the consequences of closed fractures of the fourth and fifth metacarpal bones are presented. The state of the bone corn was studied by standard x-rays of the hand in two projections and by computed tomography. The angular deformity of the fragments was measured, the range of active movements in the metacarpophalangeal joints and the grip force were determined. Pain intensity was assessed by visual analogue scale, day-by-day activity-by DASH test, the results were divided into excellent, good, satisfactory and unsatisfactory by Buechler table. The frequency and nature of postoperative complications were also analyzed. Results. In all clinical cases, positive outcomes were obtained: angular deformity was corrected, the range of motion in the metacarpophalangeal joints and grip strength improved, and the functional parameters of the hand increased. In one clinical case stiffness was formed in the metacarpophalangeal joint, which required revision operation. Summary. Corrective V-shaped osteotomy of the metacarpal bones at the top of their deformation allows to restore the alignment of the fragments and prevent shortening of the bone. The use of stable osteosynthesis with low-profile mini-plates makes possible early functional management of patients, which prevents stiffness in the joints of the fingers.
Keywords
Metacarpal bones malunion
Corrective osteotomy
Surgical treatment
Bone deformation
Callus
1 Introduction
The majority of patients with fractures of the metacarpal bones (MB) still receive conservative treatment using closed manual reposition and immobilization with plaster splints.1 In this case, due to insufficient stability, fragments are often (in 24–27% of cases) displaced at an angle and along the axis. As a result, MBs heal in a wrong position – in the form of an angle open to the palm, with rotationally altered coaxial alignment of the fragments.2,3
As a result, after fracture consolidation, patients complain of pain in the hand, aggravated by exertion, a decrease in the volume of movements in the joints of the fingers and aesthetic discomfort. These impairments are believed to be caused by MB head shifted towards the palm.4,5 The imbalance between the extrinsic and intrinsic groups of the hand muscles causes a decrease in the strength of the hand grip.6
MB shortening, associated with angular deformation, also impairs the function of the hand. It is known that MB shortening by 2 mm leads to a limitation of the extension of the proximal phalanx by 7°.7 When MB is shortened by 5 mm, the coaxial alignment of the metacarpophalangeal joint is impaired, the flexion force decreases and pain in the projection of the corresponding radial bone appears during exercise.8 Angular deformation of the MB diaphysis by more than 20° normally requires surgical correction. The main method of surgical treatment for such deformation is corrective osteotomy in combination with osteosynthesis.9–11,17
We have developed a new technique for the correction of MB deformations, which consists of a V-shaped osteotomy, open reposition and plate osteosynthesis, which has the RF patent No. 2651893 of February 20, 2019. The purpose of the study is to evaluate the results of surgical treatment in patients with post-traumatic MB deformations according to the developed method.
2 Materials and methods
From November 01, 2012 to November 01, 2018, five patients with malunited MB fractures were under our observation. The mean age of the patients was 24.2 years (from 15 to 39 years). Four patients had deformations in the fifth MB and one had a deformation in the fourth MB. The mean angle of the MB deformation was 34.8°. The mean time after injury to reconstructive surgery was 2.5 months (from one to five months). Indications for surgery included patient dissatisfaction with the appearance of the damaged hand, limited mobility of the fingers, reduced strength of the grip and significant pain during exercise.
All patients underwent V-shaped corrective osteotomy of the MBs and plate osteosynthesis. Angular-stable mini-plates were used in three patients and low-profile plates without lockage were used in two patients. A comprehensive assessment of the treatment outcomes was carried out one year after surgery in all patients. The condition of the callus was assessed using standard hand radiography in two projections and computed tomography. The angular displacement of the MB was assessed using radiograms; the amount of active movements in the metacarpophalangeal joints and the force of the rough grip were also evaluated.
The intensity of pain was assessed using a visual analogue scale (VAS) and daily activity was evaluated according to the DASH questionnaire; the results were considered excellent, good, satisfactory and unsatisfactory according to the Buechler table (1996).12 The frequency and nature of postoperative complications were also analyzed.13
The intervention according to our technique was performed under combined anesthesia, with a hemostyptic cuff on the shoulder. The technique was as follows. The patient's position – on the back with the arm drawn aside and a pronated forearm. The skin and subcutaneous tissue were cut with a longitudinal incision on the back of the hand in the projection of the deformed MB. The extensor tendons of the fingers and the dorsal digital nerves were moved aside and protected with elevators. The periosteum was cut longitudinally, the MB was exposed at the apex of deformation, somewhat proximal and distal from it. Through the apex of the MB deformation in the sagittal plane, a Kirchner wire was held. Towards this wire and at an angle of 35–45° to the vertical axis of the bone, a V-shaped osteotomy was performed subperiosteally, on the side of its proximal end with an oscillatory mini-saw.
During the dissection of the bone tissue, at the apex of the deformation angle, a bone bridge was maintained between the fragments up to 1 mm wide. Through the wire, located in the distal fragment, a plate with holes was placed. The distal end of the plate was fixed with a cortical screw to the distal fragment. Then the reposition was performed in combination with osteoclasia. At the same time, angular, rotational deformations and shortening of the metacarpal bone were eliminated (Fig. 1). The plate was fixed with a cortical screw to the proximal fragment of the MB, supplemented with lockable screws. Hemostasis was performed. The wound was sutured layer by layer.

A temporary palm plaster splint was applied from the fingertips to the middle third of the forearm in the «intrinsic plus » position. From the first postoperative day, therapeutic gymnastics were performed for the joints of the hand and fingers. The daily load on the operated hand was allowed not earlier than three months after intervention.
3 Results and discussion
Changes in radiometric and functional parameters of the articular joints in the patients after intervention are presented in Table 1. The healing of the MB fragments occurred on average 10.5 weeks after surgery. The mean value of angular deformation decreased from 34.8° before intervention to 2.8° after it. The volume of active movements in the metacarpophalangeal joints increased from 64.8% to 85.5% of the healthy hand by this date. Rough grip strength increased from 52.5% to 113.9%. The mean pain intensity in the hand under load decreased from 3.4 to 0.4 points. The DASH questionnaire score, which reflect the quality of daily activities of the patients, improved on average from 37.12 to 4.94 points. Among complications, one case of tenodesis was recorded, which required a repeated intervention – removal of the metal structure and tenolysis of the extensor of the fifth finger. Metal fixators were removed in three patients during the period from 6 to 18 months after surgery, two of them – for social reasons. According to the Buechler table (1996),12 the outcome was “excellent” in four patients and “good” in one patient.
| Patient ident. No. | Gender | Age (years) | Type of fracture (АО/ASIF) | Clinical criteria | |||||||||
| Before intervention | 1 year after intervention | ||||||||||||
| Abgular deformation (°) | VAS (10) | DASH(points) | VAM(%) | Strength (%) | Abgular deformation (°) | VAS (10) | DASH(points) | VAM(%) | Strength (%) | ||||
| 1 | M | 32 | А2 | 30 | 3 | 21.4 | 72 | 70.5 | 0 | 0 | 3.4 | 83.3 | 90 |
| 2 | M | 19 | А2 | 45 | 2.5 | 42.5 | 70 | 75 | 5 | 0 | 1.7 | 87 | 114 |
| 3 | M | 16 | А2 | 28 | 3 | 27.5 | 66 | 54.6 | 0 | 0 | 4.6 | 100 | 190 |
| 4 | M | 15 | В2 | 45 | 4 | 40 | 61 | 25 | 9 | 0.5 | 5.8 | 92 | 80.6 |
| 5 | M | 39 | А2 | 26 | 4.6 | 54.2 | 55 | 37.5 | 0 | 1.5 | 9.2 | 65 | 95 |
Clinical example. Patient A., 16 years old, a high school student, was admitted to the traumatology department of the polyclinic in October 2015. Was injured five months ago, diagnosis: a closed fracture of the fifth MB of the right hand with displacement of fragments. In the emergency room a closed manual reposition was performed and a plaster splint was placed for four weeks. Subsequent conservative treatment was carried out in the clinic at the place of residence.
At admission, deformity of the right hand with retraction of the dorsal contour of the head of the fifth PC was noted (Fig. 2), the volume of active movements in the metacarpophalangeal joint was 66%, the strength of the rough grip of the hand was 54.6% compared to the contralateral limb. The patient evaluated pain in the hand under load as three points out of 10 on VAS.

In the radiograms of the right hand, the healing of the fifth MB in the lower third was observed at an angle of 28° open to the palm and shortening of the MB by 4 mm (Fig. 3).

The intervention was performed according to the developed method (Fig. 4). The postoperative period was without complications. Immobilization was performed using a removable plaster splint only for the period of a night sleep. Active movements without load in the metacarpophalangeal and interphalangeal joints were initiated on the first day after intervention. Four weeks later, an outpatient course of restorative physiotherapy was used. Radiographic signs of MB healing in the osteotomy area were observed after eight weeks.

At the control visit one year later: the deformation of the hand is completely resolved, the volume of active movements in the metacarpophalangeal joint was 100%, the strength of the rough grip of the hand was 190% compared to the intact limb (Fig. 5), there was no pain at rest and under load (0/10 on VAS). The results of the DASH questionnaire – 4.6 points.

The computer tomogram and radiograms of the right hand showed the signs of complete healing of the metacarpal bone in the osteotomy area (Fig. 6). According to the Buechler table (1996),12 the outcome was rated as “excellent”.

The main goals of the treatment in malunited MB fractures are the elimination of deformations of the hand, restoration of a complete painless grip and maximum range of movements in the joints of the fingers. Currently, several types of corrective osteotomies of the MBs are used to eliminate their angular and rotational deformations.
In classical closing-wedge osteotomy, a v-shaped graft is resected at the apex of the deformation, fragments are repaired and osteosynthesis is performed. At the same time, due to the removal of the part of the MB, it is shortened. K. Karthik et al.6 used this method in 14 clinical observations and obtained improvements according to the results of the DASH questionnaire: from 57.54 baseline points – up to 5.95 points after intervention. The average MB deformation angle of 43° was completely eliminated. Despite some shortening, no additional MB lengthening interventions were required.
Pivot osteotomy proposed by A. Thurston et al. also belongs to the category of closing-wedge osteotomy.4 However, at the same time, MBs are resected only ½ of its diameter from the back side, which leads to a less significant shortening. In eight patients (10 MBs), the authors observed healing after six weeks. In one patient, due to a delayed consolidation, a relapse of the deformation was observed which required a revision surgery.
According to A. Bot and J. Jupiter,5 opening-wedge osteotomy in MB deformations, which requires a bone graft and stable fixation of the fragments with a plate and screws, results in the optimal restoration of the tendon tone and movement range in the hand joints.
X. Zhang et al.14 suggested that, when performing an opening-wedge v-shaped osteotomy of the MBs, the bone allograft should be placed on the palmar side of the post-repositioning defect for the prevention of the MB shortening.14 F. Yong et al.15 proposed a double osteotomy with the formation of a trapezoid graft at the apex of the deformation, which, after 180° rotation was placed between the proximal and distal fragments. The fragments and the graft were fixed with a straight mini-plate and cortical compression screws. Healing was observed on average after four months.15
The osteotomy we used was also opening-wedge. Its peculiarity was that MB healing in all clinical observations was achieved without the use of bone grafting. For the fixation of the MB fragments after osteotomy, various methods and constructions are used: Kirchner wires, intramedullary pins, mini-plates, external fixation devices, and cerclage wiring.
X. Zhang et al.14 performed the transfixation of the fourth and fifth MBs with the Kirchner wire for eight weeks after the opening-wedge osteotomy of the fifth MB.
I.A. El Delbani et al.9 used lockable metal intramedullary pins for MB osteosynthesis after osteotomy. The intervention was performed in 112 patients with malunited MBs. Healing was achieved over three to four months. The authors obtained good results in 97.2% of clinical observations.
In order to stabilize the bone fragments of the tubular bones of the hand and eliminate contractures in adjacent joints, V.I. Shevtsov et al.10 used a mini Ilizarov apparatus after the MB corrective osteotomy. Excellent and good treatment outcomes were obtained in 89.3% of clinical observations.
V.A. Kirsanov et al. proposed a combination of intramedullary and extrafocal transosseous osteosynthesis for the fixation of the fragments of the metacarpal bones after osteotomy, which allows the prevention of rotational displacements of the bone fragments, wire migration, deformation and fracture of the metal structure.16
According to D. Ring et al.,2 complications, such as infection in the areas of surgery, delayed consolidation or non-union of the fragments, joint stiffness, degeneration, chronic pain, as well as destruction and migration of metal structures, may develop in corrective MB osteotomies.
According to our clinical observations, one patient developed stiffness in the metacarpophalangeal joint, requiring the removal of the metal structure and tenolysis of the fifth finger extensor in late postoperative period. There were no cases of non-union of bone fragments or fixator migration.
4 Conclusions
1.Opening-wedge V-shaped osteotomy of the metacarpal bones at the apex of their meta-diaphyseal deformation is an effective and safe technique for effective restoration of the coaxial alignment of the fragments and length of the segment.2.This technique does not require the collection of bone grafts from the donor area, therefore reducing the invasiveness of surgical intervention.3.Bone contact in the form of a bridge between MB fragments, maintained after osteotomy, provides a certain stability of the fragments, important for reposition and osteosynthesis, which contributes to uncomplicated healing.4.The use of stable osteosynthesis with angular-stable low-profile mini-plates provides early functional treatment of patients, which reduces stiffness in the joints of the fingers.
Source of funding
The study was conducted without sponsorship.
This study is limited to a small number and short duration of clinical observations. The example patient gave an informed consent to the publication of clinical data.
References
- The effect of closed reduction of small finger metacarpal neck fractures on the ultimate angular deformity. J Hand Surg Am. 2015;40(8):1582-1585.
- [Google Scholar]
- Malunion and nonunion of the metacarpals and phalanges. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87(6):1380-1388.
- [Google Scholar]
- Complications after the fractures of metacarpal and phalanges. Hand Clin. 2010;26(2):169-177.
- [Google Scholar]
- Pivot osteotomy for the correction of malunion of metacarpal neck fractures. J Hand Surg Br. 1992;17(5):580-582.
- [Google Scholar]
- Corrective osteotomy for malunited metacarpal fractures: long-term results of a novel technique. J Hand Surg. 2015;40(8):840-845.
- [Google Scholar]
- Metacarpal shaft fractures: the effect of shortening on the extensor tendon mechanism. J Hand Surg. Am.. 1998;23(3):519-523.
- [Google Scholar]
- The effect of metacarpal shortening on digital flexion force. J Hand Surg Eur. 2013;38(6):667-672.
- [Google Scholar]
- Treatment incorrectly for consolidated metacarpal fractures. J Gene Med. 2009;4:42-46.
- [Google Scholar]
- Correction of posttraumatic deformities of the hand bones using an external fixator. Orthopaedic Genius. 2009;2:28-33.
- [Google Scholar]
- Piezoelectric osteotomy in hand surgery: first experiences with a new technique. BMC Muscoskelet Disord. 2006;12(7):36-37.
- [Google Scholar]
- Corrective osteotomy for posttraumatic malunion of the phalanges in the hand. J Hand Surg Br. 1996;21(1):33-42.
- [Google Scholar]
- Experimental study of the stability of osteosynthesis against osteoporosis using a new metal fixator. Postgraduate Bulletin of the Volga region. 2016;5–6:175-178.
- [Google Scholar]
- Palmar opening wedge osteotomy for malunion of fifth metacarpal neck fractures. J Hand Surg Am. 2013;38(12):2461-2465.
- [Google Scholar]
- Trapezoid rotational bone graft osteotomy for metacarpal and phalangeal fracture malunion. J Hand Surg Eur. 2007;32(3):282-288.
- [Google Scholar]
- Optimization of surgical treatment of post-traumatic deformations of the metacarpal bones by the combined method. 2018:55-56.
- [Google Scholar]
- The use of alternative experimental models on microsurgery technique’s training for medicine undergradute students. Periodico Tche Quimica. 2017;14(27):117-122.
- [Google Scholar]
