Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Case Report
Clinical research study
Current Issue
Editorial Board
Literature Review
Narrative review
Original Article
Research Article
Review Article
Short Report
Surgical techniques
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Case Report
Clinical research study
Current Issue
Editorial Board
Literature Review
Narrative review
Original Article
Research Article
Review Article
Short Report
Surgical techniques
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

71 (); 310-314
doi:
10.1016/j.jor.2025.10.013

Mid-to long-term outcomes and CT-assessed radiolucency with cemented single-peg glenoid component for anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Toho University Graduate School of Medicine, Ota-ku, Tokyo, Japan
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Toho University Ohashi Medical Center, Meguro-ku, Tokyo, Japan

⁎Corresponding author: Hiroyasu Ikegami. hiroyasu.ikegami@med.toho-u.ac.jp

Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Reed Elsevier India Pvt. Ltd. and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

Abstract

Abstract

Evidence on postoperative outcomes and computed tomography (CT) assessment of glenoid radiolucency after anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA) with a cemented single-peg component remains limited. This study evaluated mid-to long-term clinical outcomes and their association with CT-assessed radiolucency.

We retrospectively reviewed 26 shoulders in 23 patients who underwent aTSA with a cemented single-peg polyethylene glenoid component between 2006 and 2015. Clinical outcomes and radiographic parameters were evaluated, including the critical shoulder angle (CSA), proximal humeral superior subluxation, glenoid inclination, and retroversion. Radiolucency was assessed on coronal and axial CT images (0–30), with a radiolucent line total score ≥9 defined as radiolucency-positive. Outcomes were compared by radiolucency, and coronal–axial discordance was analyzed.

The mean follow-up was 132 months. Implant survival was 100 %. At the final follow-up, mean range of motion and clinical scores were favorable (forward elevation 110.6°, abduction 104.4°, external rotation 39.2°, internal rotation 5.2 (Flurin score; L3-L1); American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score 70.9, Oxford Shoulder Score 37.2, University of California, Los Angeles Shoulder Score 24.8). Radiolucency was observed in 8 shoulders (30.8 %). Although clinical outcomes did not differ significantly by radiolucency, the positive group had a larger CSA (36.9° vs 31.2°, P = 0.008) and more frequent superior subluxation (50.0 % vs 5.6 %, P = 0.020). Coronal–axial discordance occurred in 8 shoulders (30.8 %), with 6 (75 %) radiolucency-positive.

The cemented single-peg glenoid component for aTSA showed 100 % implant survival at mid-to long-term follow-up. Radiolucency was associated with larger CSA and superior humeral head subluxation but was not associated with worse clinical outcomes. CT assessment using both axial and coronal planes was a useful method for providing a more accurate evaluation of radiolucency.

Abstract

Highlights

•Favorable mid-to long-term outcomes with cemented single-peg glenoid component in aTSA.•CT-assessed radiolucency did not consistently correspond with clinical outcomes.•Combined coronal and axial CT improved radiolucency evaluation accuracy.

Keywords

Anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty
Cemented single-peg glenoid component
Computed tomography
Radiolucency
1

1 Introduction

Anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA) is effective for pain relief and improves function in patients with glenohumeral arthritis, with a reported 10-year implant survival rate of 96 %.1 The procedure has become increasingly common; however, revision to reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) has emerged as a clinical concern. Loosening of the glenoid components is a major complication and one of the most frequent causes of implant failure.2

Glenoid radiolucencies have been reported to develop, with notable changes occurring five or more years after surgery.3 Computed tomography (CT) has been employed to assess radiolucency in greater detail,4 and superior glenoid inclination has been identified as a contributing factor in long-term follow-up studies of multi-peg components.5 In contrast, radiolucency in cemented single-peg designs has been rarely documented.

The cemented single-peg glenoid component may provide advantages for bone preservation during revision surgery owing to their simpler structure. Nevertheless, most prior studies have focused on multi-peg designs, while data specifically addressing the clinical outcomes of the cemented single-peg glenoid component remain limited. Furthermore, CT-based evaluation of radiolucency in this design has seldom been reported.

The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the postoperative clinical outcomes of aTSA using the cemented single-peg glenoid component. The secondary aim was to examine the relationship between CT-assessed radiolucency and postoperative outcomes.

2

2 Material and methods

2.1

2.1 Study design and patients

In this retrospective cohort study, 36 shoulders (31 patients) treated with the cemented single-peg polyethylene glenoid component between January 2006 and December 2015 were screened. Patients were excluded if they had less than 5 years of follow-up, a history of septic arthritis of the shoulder, or lacked postoperative CT. In total, 26 shoulders (23 patients) were analyzed (Fig. 1).

Flowchart of patient selection. a Six shoulders were excluded due to follow-up less than 5 years, one of which also had a history of septic arthritis of the shoulder. Abbreviations: aTSA, anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty; CT, computed tomography.
Fig. 1 Flowchart of patient selection. a Six shoulders were excluded due to follow-up less than 5 years, one of which also had a history of septic arthritis of the shoulder. Abbreviations: aTSA, anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty; CT, computed tomography.

All procedures were performed by a single fellowship-trained shoulder surgeon. The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of Toho University Ohashi Medical Center (No. H23113_H21098_H20096).

The primary outcomes were postoperative range of motion (ROM), clinical scores, complications, revision rate, and radiolucency around the peg as assessed by CT. Secondary outcomes included comparison of clinical results according to the presence or absence of radiolucency on CT, as well as analysis of associated factors such as the critical shoulder angle (CSA), proximal humeral superior subluxation, glenoid inclination, glenoid retroversion.

2.2

2.2 Surgical technique

All procedures used a deltopectoral approach in the beach chair position. The subscapularis tendon was managed with a peel technique and sharply elevated from its insertion on the humerus using a scalpel. Three No. 2 FiberWire sutures (Arthrex Inc., Naples, FL, USA) were then placed for later repair. After exposure of the glenoid, it was reamed, and cancellous bone harvested from the resected humeral head was packed into the peg hole. A single-peg all-polyethylene glenoid component (SMR Glenoid Component; Lima Corporate S. p.A., San Daniele del Friuli, Italy) was implanted using bone cement under manual pressurization, with the component size matched to the native glenoid diameter. The subscapularis was then repaired slightly superior to its original insertion using the Cofield technique6 to restore its depressor function. Postoperative immobilization was limited to the day of surgery, and stepwise rehabilitation was initiated on postoperative day 1. No changes in surgical technique or implant design occurred during the study period.

2.3

2.3 Clinical and radiographic evaluation

At the final postoperative follow-up, range of motion (forward elevation, abduction, external rotation, and internal rotation), clinical scores including the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES)7 score, Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS),8 and University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA)9 score, complications, and revision surgery were recorded. Internal rotation was graded using Flurin's 7-point scale.10 Standard anteroposterior radiographs obtained at the final follow-up were assessed according to the Lazarus classification,11 CSA,12 and proximal humeral superior subluxation. Subluxation was evaluated using the Torchia classification13; cases classified as moderate (25–50 %) or severe (>50 %) displacement were considered to have superior subluxation. Immediate postoperative radiographs were reviewed to confirm that displacement had developed postoperatively.

Postoperative CT scans (3-mm contiguous slices) were routinely obtained at 5 and 10 years after surgery. Five zones around the peg were defined in each plane, modified from the method of Yian et al.,4 and each radiolucent line (RL) in these zones was scored on a 0–3 scale (0 mm = 0, 0–1 mm = 1, 1–2 mm = 2, >2 mm = 3). CT images and schematic diagrams illustrating the scoring method are shown in Fig. 2. The coronal and axial scores (range, 0–15 each) were summed to obtain an RL total score (0–30). Based on a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis anchored to a Lazarus grade ≥3, an RL total score ≥9 was defined as radiolucency-positive, and individual plane scores were dichotomized at 4.5 points.

Radiolucent line scoring zones around the single-peg glenoid component. (A, B) Schematic coronal and axial views illustrating five scoring zones used for RL evaluation. (C, D) Corresponding postoperative CT images with overlaid zone numbers. Abbreviations: RL, radiolucent line; CT, computed tomography; Ant, anterior; Post, posterior; Sup, superior; Inf, inferior.
Fig. 2 Radiolucent line scoring zones around the single-peg glenoid component. (A, B) Schematic coronal and axial views illustrating five scoring zones used for RL evaluation. (C, D) Corresponding postoperative CT images with overlaid zone numbers. Abbreviations: RL, radiolucent line; CT, computed tomography; Ant, anterior; Post, posterior; Sup, superior; Inf, inferior.

Glenoid inclination and retroversion were measured on postoperative CT according to the methods of Maurer14 and Friedman,15 respectively. All radiographic parameters were independently measured by two board-certified orthopedic surgeons, and interobserver reliability was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC 2,1). Because the Lazarus classification is ordinal, its mean score was used after confirming sufficient interobserver agreement (ICC = 0.930).

2.4

2.4 Statistical analysis

The RL total score was dichotomized at 9 points to classify shoulders into high- and low-RL groups. For continuous variables, normality was assessed using the Shapiro–Wilk test. Variables with normal distribution were compared using Student's t-test, whereas those not meeting this assumption were compared using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Categorical variables were compared using Fisher's exact test. Agreement between coronal and axial plane assessments was evaluated using a two-by-two contingency table, and the number of shoulders with an RL total score ≥9 was recorded in each cell. Statistical analyses were performed using JMP Pro 18 software (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA), with a significance level of P < 0.05.

3

3 Results

3.1

3.1 Patient demographics

Twenty-six shoulders in 23 patients who underwent aTSA with the cemented single-peg glenoid component and were followed for more than 5 years were included. The mean patient age was 70.1 ± 13.4 years (range, 35–87 years), and the mean follow-up period was 132 ± 41.4 months (range, 73–217 months). Of the included shoulders, 2 (7.7 %) were male and 24 (92.3 %) were female, with an equal distribution of operated sides (right, 13; left, 13). The underlying diagnoses were primary osteoarthritis in 11 shoulders (42.3 %), rheumatoid arthritis in 10 (38.5 %), post-traumatic arthritis in 3 (11.5 %), and osteonecrosis of the humeral head in 2 (7.7 %).

3.2

3.2 Clinical and radiographic outcomes

Implant survival of the cemented single-peg glenoid component was 100 %, with no cases requiring revision. At the final follow-up, the mean forward elevation, abduction, external rotation, and internal rotation (Flurin scale) were 110.6° ± 35.9°, 104.4° ± 32.6°, 39.2° ± 22.1°, and 5.2 ± 0.7, respectively. The mean ASES, OSS, and UCLA scores were 70.9 ± 21.8, 37.2 ± 10.5, and 24.8 ± 5.5, respectively. Two periprosthetic fractures occurred in patients with rheumatoid arthritis; both healed with conservative treatment. No other major complications, including dislocation, infection, or mechanical failure, were observed.

Radiographically, the Lazarus classification grade ≥3 was observed in 7 shoulders (26.9 %). The mean CSA was 33.0°, and proximal humeral superior subluxation according to the Torchia classification was present in 5 shoulders (19 %). The mean RL total score was 5.3, while the mean glenoid inclination and retroversion were 15.0° and 6.1°, respectively (Table 1).

Table 1 Postoperative clinical and radiographic parameters.
Variable Value (mean ± SD or n [%])
Clinical outcomes
Forward elevation (°) 110.6 ± 35.9
Abduction (°) 104.4 ± 32.6
External rotation (°) 39.2 ± 22.1
Internal rotation (Flurin score)a 5.2 ± 0.7
ASES score 70.9 ± 21.8
OSS score 37.2 ± 10.5
UCLA score 24.8 ± 5.5
Radiological Parameters
Lazarus classification Grade 0: 4 (15 %), Grade 1: 6 (23 %),
Grade 2: 9 (35 %), Grade 3: 4 (15 %),
Grade 4: 3 (12 %), Grade 5: 0 (0 %)
CSA (°) 33.0 ± 5.2
Proximal humeral superior subluxationb 5 (19 %)
RL score – coronal/axial/total 2.8 ± 2.5/2.5 ± 2.5/5.3 ± 4.1
Glenoid inclination (°) 15.2 ± 8.0
Glenoid retroversion (°) 6.1 ± 7.1
Internal rotation was graded using the Flurin scale (0 = 0°,1 = hip,2 = buttocks,3 = sacrum,4 = L5-L4 ,5 = L3-L1,6 = T12-T8,7 = T7 or higher).
Proximal humeral superior subluxation was presented as number and percentage (n, %), defined as Torchia grade ≥ moderate (grade 2 or 3).
3.3

3.3 Radiolucency-positive vs radiolucency-negative comparison

Based on ROC analysis anchored to a Lazarus grade ≥3, radiolucency-positive was defined as an RL total score ≥9, which was observed in 8 of 26 shoulders (30.8 %). No significant differences were observed between the radiolucency-positive and radiolucency-negative groups in forward elevation (101.5° vs 119.6°, P = 0.063), abduction (92.1° vs 109.2°, P = 0.249), external rotation (28.1° vs 44.2°, P = 0.088), or internal rotation (Flurin score 4.9 vs 5.3, P = 0.164). Similarly, no significant differences were observed in ASES, OSS, or UCLA scores. By contrast, CSA was significantly larger in the radiolucency-positive group (36.9° vs 31.2°, P = 0.008), and proximal humeral superior subluxation was significantly more frequent (50.0 % vs 5.6 %, P = 0.020). Glenoid inclination and retroversion showed no significant differences (Table 2).

Table 2 Comparison of outcomes between radiolucency-positive and radiolucency-negative groups.
Variable Radiolucency-positive Radiolucency-negative P value
(n = 8) (n = 18)
Mean ± SD (range) or n (%) Mean ± SD (range) or n (%)
Demographics
Age (yr) 67 ± 12.4 (49–85) 71.4 ± 14.0 (35–87) 0.303
Sex (Male/Female) 0 (0 %)/8 (100 %) 2 (11.1 %)/16 (88.9 %) 1.000
Diagnosis (OA/RA/PTA/ON) 4 (50.0 %)/4 (50.0 %)/0 (0 %)/0 (0 %) 7 (38.9 %)/6 (33.3 %)/3 (16.7 %)/3 (16.7 %)
Follow-up duration (months) 142.3 ± 37.3 (73–190) 127.4 ± 43.4 (73–217) 0.412
Operated side (Right/Left) 7 (87.5 %)/1 (12.5 %) 6 (33.3 %)/12 (66.7 %) 0.030
Shoulder ROM
Forward elevation (°) 101.5 ± 26.6 119.6 ± 42.4 0.063
Abduction (°) 92.1 ± 35.3 109.2 ± 31.2 0.249
External rotation (°) 28.1 ± 24.8 44.2 ± 19.6 0.088
Internal rotation (°) (Flurin score) 4.9 ± 0.6 5.3 ± 0.7 0.164
Clinical score
ASES score 65.1 ± 19.0 73.4 ± 23.0 0.242
OSS score 34.6 ± 10.4 38.3 ± 10.6 0.329
UCLA score 22.3 ± 4.8 25.9 ± 5.5 0.124
Radiographic score
CSA (°) 36.9 ± 5.0 31.2 ± 4.4 0.008
Proximal humeral superior subluxation (≥ moderate) 4 (50.0 %) 1 (5.6 %) 0.020
Glenoid inclination (°) 18.1 ± 10.0 13.9 ± 6.8 0.224
Glenoid retroversion (°) 4.6 ± 6.2 6.8 ± 7.6 0.676
3.4

3.4 Coronal–axial discordance in CT-based radiolucency assessment

Using a cut-off value of 4.5 points, individual plane scores were dichotomized into low and high categories on both the coronal and axial planes. Among the 26 shoulders, 4 were classified as coronal-low/axial-high and 4 as coronal-high/axial-low, resulting in 8 discordant cases (30.8 %). Notably, 6 of these 8 discordant shoulders (75 %) were radiolucency-positive (Table 3).

Table 3 Cross-classification of shoulders based on coronal and axial RL scores.
Coronal
High (≥4.5) Low (<4.5) Total
Axial High (≥4.5) 2 (2)a 4 (3) 6 (5)
Low (<4.5) 4 (3) 16 (0) 20 (3)
Total 6 (5) 20 (3) 26 (8)
Values show number of shoulders; numbers in parentheses indicate radiolucency-positive cases. Bold values indicate discordant cases (coronal low × axial high, or axial low × coronal high).
4

4 Discussion

This study demonstrated that aTSA using the cemented single-peg glenoid component achieved favorable long-term outcomes, and radiolucency, when present, did not consistently correspond with inferior clinical performance. To our knowledge, this is the first report to focus on postoperative clinical outcomes and CT-assessed radiolucency in this design.

Raiss et al. reported no revisions with keel-type components at 11 years,16 McLendon et al. reported an 83 % survival rate at 10 years with three-peg components,17 and Matsui et al. documented two revisions in 18 shoulders with multi-peg components.5 Although direct comparisons are limited by design differences, the present results suggest that the single-peg glenoid component provides long-term outcomes comparable to these alternatives. Despite concerns that fewer pegs may compromise fixation strength and long-term outcomes, our findings provide little evidence to support such assumptions. Rather, the bone-preserving nature of the single-peg design may offer advantages in revision settings. Further long-term comparative studies are warranted to determine whether these structural features translate into meaningful clinical benefits.

No significant differences in clinical scores or ROM were observed between radiolucency-positive and radiolucency-negative groups. Karelse et al. described loosening as a progressive process from radiolucent lines to revision,18 supporting the view that radiolucency may represent an early finding rather than immediate clinical failure.

With respect to CSA, Tabeayo et al. reported that values > 35° were associated with glenoid loosening after aTSA,19 and Watling et al. confirmed CSA as a risk factor on plain radiographs.20 Wolf et al. further showed that larger postoperative CSA predicted progressive cranialization and loosening at long-term follow-up.21 Consistent with these findings, our study demonstrated significantly greater CSA values in radiolucency-positive shoulders (mean 36.9°), suggesting that CSA may serve as a radiographic marker for secondary cuff dysfunction after aTSA and contribute to the progression of radiolucency.

Similarly, proximal humeral superior subluxation was significantly associated with radiolucency. Young et al. reported that secondary rotator cuff dysfunction after TSA can impose eccentric loading on the glenoid component, described as “superior migration.“22 Gonzalez et al. noted that cuff tears may lead to superior loading and the “rocking-horse effect.“23 While some studies have suggested that superior migration is part of the natural history of aTSA and not always associated with poor outcomes,24 Lafosse et al. further indicated that its predictive value for rotator cuff failure or glenoid loosening is very limited, as it has not been consistently correlated with inferior clinical outcomes or higher revision rates.25 Our findings showed higher rates of superior subluxation in radiolucency-positive shoulders. This suggests that such subluxation after aTSA cannot be explained solely by natural history and warrants careful interpretation of long-term radiographic changes. Importantly, our results suggest that when superior subluxation is observed on plain radiographs, it may provide a rationale for further evaluation of radiolucency, and CT assessment for this purpose could contribute to follow-up strategies after aTSA.

Radiographic evaluation is commonly based on plain radiographs, with anteroposterior views assumed to correspond to the coronal plane on CT. Although CT provides greater detail, prior studies have primarily focused on the axial plane.4,5 To our knowledge, no previous study has systematically compared radiolucency on both planes. In the present study, discordance between coronal and axial CT assessments occurred in one-third of cases, and notably, the majority of discordant shoulders (6 of 8, 75 %) were radiolucency-positive. This finding suggests that evaluation limited to a single imaging plane may underestimate radiolucency, and combined coronal and axial CT assessment may provide a more comprehensive evaluation.

This study has several limitations. First, it was a retrospective study with a small sample size, limiting generalizability. Second, CT scans were performed at two postoperative time points (5 and 10 years), which may have introduced variability. Third, the number of discordant cases was small, precluding detailed subgroup analysis. Additionally, because this was a single time-point analysis, causality could not be established, and further longitudinal studies are required. No revision cases occurred; therefore, loosening could not be directly confirmed, and comparisons relied on the presence or absence of radiolucency. Moreover, there is no consensus on standardized thresholds for loosening, and although our definition was derived from ROC analysis, this remains a limitation. Nevertheless, cemented single-peg glenoid components have been rarely reported, and long-term data on this design remain scarce. Therefore, even this small cohort can provide valuable insights by offering long-term clinical and radiographic data on single-peg glenoid components.

Future studies with additional cases and extended follow-up may help clarify the relationship between clinical outcomes and radiolucency.

5

5 Conclusion

The cemented single-peg glenoid component for aTSA demonstrated favorable outcomes, with 100 % implant survival over a mean follow-up of 132 months. Radiolucency assessed on CT did not necessarily correspond with worse clinical outcomes. Larger CSA and proximal humeral superior subluxation were associated with radiolucency.

CT assessment using both axial and coronal planes was a useful method for providing a more accurate evaluation of radiolucency.

Ethical approval

The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of Toho University Ohashi Medical Center (Approval No. H23113_H21098_H20096).

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Misato Sakamoto: Data curation, Formal analysis, Interpretation, Writing – original draft. Hideaki Ishii: Formal analysis, Interpretation. Takanori Shintaku: Data curation. Shu Yoshizawa: Data curation. Takahiro Maeda: Data curation. Hiroyasu Ikegami: Conceptualization, Writing – original draft, Supervision.

All authors reviewed the manuscript, approved the final version, and agreed to its submission.

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

References

  1. , , . Survivorship of anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2022;30:457-465.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. , , , et al . Glenoid component failure in total shoulder arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90:885-896.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. , , , et al . Radiographic survival in total shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2013;22:1221-1227.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. , , , et al . Radiographic and computed tomographic analyses of cemented pegged polyethylene glenoid components in total shoulder replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87:1928-1936.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. , , , et al . Computed tomography revealed the correlation between radiolucency and alignment of all-polyethylene pegged glenoid component more than 10 years after total shoulder arthroplasty in the Japanese population. J Orthop Sci. 2023;28:131-137.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. , . Subscapular muscle transposition for repair of chronic rotator cuff tears. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1982;154:667-672.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. , , , et al . A standardized method for the assessment of shoulder function. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 1994;3(6):347-352.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. , , , . Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about shoulder surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1996;78(4):593-600.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. , , , . UCLA anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty: a long-term follow-up study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1981;155:7-20.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. , , , et al . Comparison of outcomes using anatomic and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. Bull Hosp Jt Dis. 2013;71(Suppl 2):101-107.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. , , , et al . The radiographic evaluation of keeled and pegged glenoid component insertion. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002;84:1174-1182.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. , , , et al . Is there an association between the individual anatomy of the scapula and the development of rotator cuff tears or osteoarthritis of the glenohumeral joint? Radiological study of the critical shoulder angle. Bone Joint Lett J. 2013;95-B:935-941.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. , , , . Total shoulder arthroplasty with the Neer prosthesis: long-term results. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 1997;6:495-505.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. , , , et al . Assessment of glenoid inclination on routine clinical radiographs and computed tomography examinations of the shoulder. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2012;21:1096-1103.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. , , , . The use of computerized tomography in the measurement of glenoid version. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1992;74:1032-1037.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. , , , et al . Results of cemented total shoulder replacement with a minimum follow-up of ten years. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012;94(1–10)
    [Google Scholar]
  17. , , , et al . Survival of the pegged glenoid component in shoulder arthroplasty: part II. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2017;26:1469-1476.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. , , , et al . Parameters influencing glenoid loosening. Expet Rev Med Dev. 2016;13:773-784.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. , , , et al . The association between critical shoulder angle and revision following anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty: a matched case-control study. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2022;31:1796-1802.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. , , , et al . Glenoid component loosening associated with increased critical shoulder angle at midterm follow-up. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2018;27:449-454.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. , , , et al . Effect of the critical shoulder angle on severe cranialization following total shoulder arthroplasty. J Orthop. 2020;21:240-244.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. , , , et al . Secondary rotator cuff dysfunction following total shoulder arthroplasty for primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis: results of a multicenter study with more than five years of follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012;94:685-693.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. , , , et al . Complications of unconstrained shoulder prostheses. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2011;20:666-682.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. , , , et al . Superior migration of the humeral head does not significantly affect outcomes at an average of 11 years after total shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2023;32:2493-2500.
    [Google Scholar]
Show Sections