Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Case Report
Clinical research study
Current Issue
Editorial Board
Literature Review
Narrative review
Original Article
Research Article
Review Article
Short Report
Surgical techniques
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Case Report
Clinical research study
Current Issue
Editorial Board
Literature Review
Narrative review
Original Article
Research Article
Review Article
Short Report
Surgical techniques
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

63 (); 35-42
doi:
10.1016/j.jor.2024.10.027

Measurement of periarticular subcutaneous fat on CT images and adverse outcomes following total knee arthroplasty

Corewell Health, 3535 W 13 Mile Road, Suite 744, Royal Oak, MI, 48073, USA
Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, 586 Pioneer Dr, Rochester, MI, 48309, USA
University of Toledo Medical Center, 1125 Hospital Drive, Toledo, OH, 43614, USA
Detroit Medical Center, 311 Mack Ave, Detroit, MI, 48201, USA
Corewell Health, 10000 Telegraph Road, Suite 100, Taylor, MI, 48180, USA

⁎Corresponding author: Mazen Zamzam. zamzam@oakland.edu

Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Reed Elsevier India Pvt. Ltd. and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

Abstract

Abstract

Obesity is associated with a higher rate of wound complications following primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). With readily available computer tomography (CT) images from robotic-assisted TKA, we analyzed measurement of fat content on preoperative CT images as a possible predictor of wound complications following primary TKA.

Patients who underwent robotic-assisted TKA at one institution in 2018 were included in this retrospective cohort study. Two independent reviewers measured three SCF areas at different axial CT cuts and normalized them by dividing the area of the distal femur. These areas were distributed into 4 groups. Any wound complication that required clinical or surgical intervention was reviewed and analyzed. For further comparison, prepatellar SCF thickness ratio measured on CT scan and BMI were grouped and analyzed similarly for wound complications. We also analyzed any association of SCF measurement with secondary outcomes such as operative time, length of stay, readmission, and reoperation.

One hundred fifty patients with diagnosis of osteoarthritis, mean age of 64 years and BMI of 34.3 kg/m2 were included in this study. Ninety-one patients (61 %) were female. Normalized SCF measurements at 2 cm above the patella, mid-patella, and tibial tubercle had excellent intraclass correlation coefficient at 0.987, 0.989, and 0.989, respectively. When SCF at 2 cm above patella was analyzed, Group 1 (smallest amount of SCF) had a significantly higher wound complication rate compared with Groups 2 and 3 combined (18.9 vs 5.3 %, p = 0.036). Group 4 (largest amount of SCF) also had a significantly higher wound complication rate compared with Groups 2 and 3 combined (18.9 vs 5.3 %, p = 0.036).

Accurate and consistent measurement of periarticular fat around the knee based on axial CT images demonstrated that moderate amount of fat is associated with better clinical outcomes following primary TKA. Our study did not find any clinical significance of gender difference in fat distribution. Therefore, more studies should be undertaken to evaluate for any clinical association of gender-specific fat distribution and to confirm our finding that a certain amount of fatty tissue is necessary for improved outcomes following TKA.

Keywords

Arthroplasty
Obesity
Subcutaneous fat
Osteoarthritis
Knee
1

1 Background

As the prevalence of obesity increases in the United States,1 there is an ever increasing demand on surgeons to perform total knee arthroplasty (TKA) on high-risk patients.2–4 A catastrophic complication that hinders the success of TKA in this patient population is the development of a surgical site infection (SSI). Body mass index (BMI) is an easily calculable measurement that can be used to assess the patient's risk of an SSI after TKA.5 However, BMI does not accurately describe the patient's unique fat distribution or overall body composition.6,7

In an effort to study the effect of local fat composition on SSI, previous studies have measured subcutaneous fat (SCF) thickness on plain radiographs. These studies have demonstrated that excessive SCF around the knee, represented by prepatellar soft tissue thickness, is a better predictor of wound complications than BMI.8–10 However, these studies are limited by the two-dimensional nature of plain radiographs and likely misrepresent true SCF around the knee. For example, gravity can affect fat distribution when standing for lateral radiographs leading to an inaccurate measurement of parapatellar fat on radiographic images. Therefore, advanced imaging [computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)] may be a more accurate and reliably-measured representation of SCF around the knee.

In the last several years, CT imaging for TKA patients has become more common due to their use in robotic-assisted surgery.11,12 These CT scans are usually performed within 3 months of surgery for pre-operative robotic synchronization and planning and may accurately capture the patient's local fat environment. By utilizing a novel adaptation of a previously published method of quantifying tissue on advanced imaging,13 we can quantify the area of the preoperative periarticular subcutaneous fat of a TKA candidate.

The purpose of this study is to answer the following questions: (1) Can SCF around the knee on axial CT images be reliably measured using a dedicated software with a high inter-rater reliability coefficient? (2) Which axial CT cut demonstrates the most accurate predictor of wound complications and how does it compare with BMI and prepatellar thickness? (3) Is there any association between SCF area measurement and other clinical findings such as readmission, periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), and reoperation? (4) What confounding factors are associated with increased wound complications following primary TKA?

2

2 Materials and methods

2.1

2.1 Patient inclusion and data collection

Institutional Review Board approval was obtained to perform a retrospective review at our institution. We reviewed all primary, MAKO robotic-assisted TKA (Stryker, Kalamazoo, MI) in 2018 from our single institution. Data was found using a statewide registry, the Michigan Arthroplasty Registry Collaborative Quality Initiative. Inclusion criteria for this study were patients over 18 years old who had a preoperative knee CT scan completed for intraoperative planning within 3 months of surgery and had at least 1 year of follow up. Exclusion criteria included unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA), revision TKA, conversion to TKA from prior open reduction and internal fixation, any prior open knee surgery, prior knee infection, postoperative incisional wound vacuum application, and contralateral TKA in a patient already included in the study.

All patients underwent medial parapatellar, mid-vastus, or subvastus knee arthrotomy based on surgeon preference. The arthrotomy was closed with a #1 running barbed absorbable suture and the subcutaneous incision was closed with either 2-0 or 3-0 absorbable suture followed by a running 4-0 absorbable suture covered by either Dermabond® or steri-strips. Occlusive dressing was applied and worn for five to seven days. The primary outcome of this study was any type of wound complication. Surgical incisions were assessed for any wound complications at 2–3 week, 3-month, and 1-year follow ups. Wound complications were categorized as minor or major. Minor wound complications were defined as erythema, cellulitis, wound dehiscence, seroma, hematoma, suture abscess or drainage that did not require any surgical intervention. Major wound complications were defined as any complication that required surgical intervention [e.g., surgical site infection (SSI) or periprosthetic infection (PJI)].

Secondary outcomes included operative time, length-of-stay (LOS), transfusion, discharge disposition, 30-day emergency room visits, 90-day readmissions, and any reoperation. We also classified any reoperation into either major, which is defined as the reoperation that involved one or more component removal or exchange and minor, which is any reoperation that did not involve any component removal [i.e., manipulation under anesthesia (MUA), arthroscopy, and irrigation and debridement]. Demographics, comorbidities, ASA score, preoperative lab (albumin, creatinine, A1C, INR, hemoglobin), social habits, and BMI were also collected for the purpose of identifying any confounding variables.

2.2

2.2 CT-guided, 2-D SCF measurement

Two independent reviewers measured the SCF area. SCF was defined as the fat superficial to the deep fascia of the thigh or leg and deep to the dermis. Three different axial CT cuts were chosen: 2 cm above the superior pole of patella (proximal), mid-patella (middle), and at the most prominent portion of tibial tubercle (distal). These areas were chosen because their locations encompass the entire incision used in the surgical exposure for TKA (Fig. 1A–D). Boundaries demarcating SCF were easily visualized and drawn using the OsiriX MD 10.0 system (Pixmeo SARL, Bernex, Switzerland). The Region of Interest (ROI) tool was used to select a pixel in the SCF region and the threshold of approximately 200 was selected to give appropriate standard deviation to calculate the SCF area under the ROI (Fig. 1E–G). Adjustment of ±10 in threshold was manually made in order to correct for any different CT quality and individual makeup of pixels in each CT scan. In order to control for variations in patient overall size, the SCF area was normalized by dividing it by the transverse area of distal femur measured 2 cm above the superior pole of the patella (Fig. 1H). Averages of 3 measurements were also calculated. Herein, we will denote normalized proximal, middle, distal and average subcutaneous fat area measured on axial CT scans as pSFA, mSFA, dSFA, and aSFA, respectively (Fig. 2).

A-J. Subcutaneous fat (SCF) measurement on representative axial CT images of a patient with BMI of 34 kg/m2. A-D. Coronal scanogram of lower extremities demonstrating where proximal, middle, and distal axial CT images were selected. E-G. Proximal, middle, and distal SCF areas were semi-automatically calculated using the OsiriX software. H. The transverse area of distal femur is measured to normalize each SCF. I. Prepatellar fat thickness is measured perpendicularly from dermis to outer surface of patella. J. Patella thickness is measured to normalize prepatellar fat thickness.
Fig. 1 A-J. Subcutaneous fat (SCF) measurement on representative axial CT images of a patient with BMI of 34 kg/m2. A-D. Coronal scanogram of lower extremities demonstrating where proximal, middle, and distal axial CT images were selected. E-G. Proximal, middle, and distal SCF areas were semi-automatically calculated using the OsiriX software. H. The transverse area of distal femur is measured to normalize each SCF. I. Prepatellar fat thickness is measured perpendicularly from dermis to outer surface of patella. J. Patella thickness is measured to normalize prepatellar fat thickness.
A–F. Each subcutaneous fat (SCF) measurement was divided into four incremental groups to compare each group's wound complication with each other: A, normalized, proximal SCF area (pSFA), B, normalized, middle SCF area (mSFA), C, normalized, distal SCF area (dSFA), D, normalized, averaged SCF area (aSFA), and E, normalized prepatellar thickness (PFT). F, BMI (in kg/m2) was divided into five groups and wound complication rate of each group was compared.
Fig. 2 A–F. Each subcutaneous fat (SCF) measurement was divided into four incremental groups to compare each group's wound complication with each other: A, normalized, proximal SCF area (pSFA), B, normalized, middle SCF area (mSFA), C, normalized, distal SCF area (dSFA), D, normalized, averaged SCF area (aSFA), and E, normalized prepatellar thickness (PFT). F, BMI (in kg/m2) was divided into five groups and wound complication rate of each group was compared.

On axial CT images, prepatellar fat thickness was measured at the mid-patella and was also normalized by dividing it by patellar thickness (Fig. 1I and J). This measurement is denoted as PFT. PFT and BMI were compared with pSFA, mSFA, dSFA, and aSFA as independent variables to study the effect of local fat tissue and obesity on primary and secondary outcomes. PFT, pSFA, mSFA, dSFA, and aSFA were then divided evenly into quartiles based on their increasing values. Thus, Group 1 represents the smallest amount of subcutaneous fat, and Group 2, 3, and 4 represent moderate, large, and the largest amount of subcutaneous fat, respectively. BMI was divided into five groups according to the commonly known classification system used in clinical practice (<25 underweight or normal, 25–29.9 overweight, 30–34.9 class I obese, 35–39.9 class II obese, ≥40 class III obese).

2.3

2.3 Statistical analysis

Inter-rater reliability was calculated using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for each CT-based measurement. Two-way random, average measure, consistency ICC was chosen to calculate inter-rater reliability using SPSS (Version 22; IBM Corp, Armonk, NY, USA). A wound complication rate within each group was compared with Pearson chi-square test, with significance α < 0.05. Subsequently, we selected one of the subcutaneous fat measurements (PFT, pSFA, mSFA, dSFA, or aSFA) that had the best combined ICC value and clinical correlation with wound complication. This measurement in comparison with BMI was further used to analyze subcutaneous fat and its association with secondary outcomes. Demographics and patients’ baseline characteristics were also further stratified based on subcutaneous fat measurements and compared with each other using a chi-square test for categorical variables or one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) for continuous variables. Any confounding variables (surgeon, bleeding disorder, smoking, diabetes, ASA, age, BMI, and preop albumin) were analyzed further with univariate analysis using chi-square test or one-way ANOVA as appropriate, as well as multivariate logistic regression analysis.

3

3 Results

3.1

3.1 CT-guided, 2-D subcutaneous fat measurement

One-hundred fifty patients who underwent MAKO-assisted primary TKA by five different surgeons were included in the study. Their mean age and BMI were 63.95 years (CI 62.41–65.50) and 34.28 kg/m2 (33.24–35.32), respectively. Ninety-one patients (60.67 %) were female. All of their preoperative diagnoses were osteoarthritis (Table 1). Two authors from this study (YMJ and JJK) measured subcutaneous fat on axial CT images. Excellent inter-rater reliability was obtained for pSFA, mSFA, dSFA, and aSFA with ICC values of 0.987, 0.989, 0.989, and 0.992, respectively. Inter-rater reliability of measuring PFT was only moderate with ICC value of 0.741. Mean, minimum, and maximum values of prepatellar thickness, proximal SFA, middle SFA, and distal SFA as well as their respective normalized measurements can be found in Table 2.

Table 1 Patients’ baseline characteristics and demographics.
Total (n = 150)
Age (Avg, 95 % CI) 63.95 (62.41–65.50)
Sex (female, %) 60.67
BMI (kg/m2, Avg, 95 % CI) 34.28 (33.24–35.32)
Comorbidities
Diabetes (%) 28
Current Smoking (%) 21.33
ASA III/IV (%) 56.67
Diagnosis: Osteoarthritis (%) 100
Table 2 Subcutaneous fat measurements, inter-rater reliability, and quartile cut-offs.
Mean (95 % CI) Min Max ICC value Defined quartile cut-offs
Prepatellar fat thickness (mm) 8.94 (8.19–9.70) 2.47 32.00 0.964
Patella thickness (mm) 19.75 (19.41–20.10) 9.25 25.30 0.827
Transverse area of distal femur (cmb) 10.90 (10.55–11.25) 6.85 17.70 0.973
Proximal SFA (cmb) 71.02 (64.06–77.99) 8.79 256.89 0.992
Middle SFA (cmb) 54.66 (49.05–60.28) 11.12 226.76 0.990
Distal SFA (cmb) 52.10 (47.36–56.85) 10.02 165.71 0.990
Average SFA (cmb)a 59.26 (53.59–64.93) 10.24 206.26 0.995
PFT (normalized prepatellar fat thickness)b 0.47 (0.42–0.52) 0.14 2.03 0.741 <0.29, 0.29–0.40, 0.40–0.56, >0.56
pSFA (normalized proximal SFA)c 6.95 (6.20–7.70) 0.59 26.50 0.987 <3.13, 3.13–6.08, 6.08–9.27, >9.27
mSFA (normalized middle SFA)c 5.34 (4.73–5.95) 0.75 23.39 0.989 <2.45, 2.45–4.48, 4.48–6.91, >6.91
dSFA (normalized distal SFA)c 5.08 (4.57–5.59) 0.68 19.00 0.989 <2.67, 2.67–4.68, 4.68–6.79, >6.79
aSFA (normalized average SFA)c 5.79 (5.18–6.41) 0.69 22.96 0.995 <2.79, 2.79–5.24, 5.24–7.47, >7.47
Average SFA is calculated by averaging proximal, middle, and distal SFA.
PFT is calculated by dividing prepatellar fat thickness by patella thickness.
pSFA, mSFA, dSFA, and aSFA were normalized by dividing each respective measurement (proximal SFA, middle SFA, distal SFA, and average SFA) by transverse area of distal femur.
3.2

3.2 Subcutaneous fat measurement and wound complication

Eighteen patients had wound complications, of which 3 were major wound complications and required operative intervention. There were 15 minor wound complications including wound drainage (n = 1), cellulitis (n = 6), necrosis/blistering (n = 3), suture abscess (n = 3) and hematoma (n = 2). After stratifying each normalized SFA measurement and PFT into quartiles of increasing value, wound complication rates in each group were tabulated and illustrated graphically in Supplemental Table 1 and Fig. 1. For pSFA and mSFA, a bimodal distribution of increased wound complications was observed. Group 1 and Group 4 independently had a statistically higher wound complication rate compared with combined Groups 2 and 3 (18.92 % vs 5.26 % for both, p = 0.036). However, major wound complications only occurred in Groups 3 and 4. A statistically significant difference in wound complications was not seen in any group for dSFA and aSFA measurements. On the other hand, for PFT and BMI, a statistically higher wound complication rate was seen in only one group of patients. While 21.62 % of patients in PFT Group 4 had wound complications compared with 8.85 % of patients in PFT Groups 1, 2, and 3 (p = 0.038) and 25 % of patients with BMI ≥40 kg/m2 had wound complications compared with 8.47 % of patients with BMI <40 kg/m2 (p = 0.011).

3.3

3.3 Subcutaneous fat area and secondary outcomes

Due to the high ICC value and unique bimodal association of wound complications, pSFA was selected for further analysis of secondary outcomes in comparison with BMI. Demographics and baseline characteristics were also stratified based on pSFA and BMI (Table 3). Younger age and higher percentage of ASA III and IV were significantly associated with higher BMI but this association was not seen in pSFA groups. Secondary outcomes were further stratified based on pSFA and BMI as seen in Table 4. Hgb drop after primary TKA was significantly greater in pSFA Group 1 compared with Groups 2, 3, and 4 (2.60 vs 2.25 g/dl, p = 0.043). pSFA Group 2 had significantly less ED visits compared to Groups 1, 3, and 4 (2.63 vs 19.64 %, p = 0.012). However, no statistically significant difference was seen in BMI groups for Hgb drop or ED visits. Any reoperation following primary TKA occurred more frequently in either higher subcutaneous fat or higher BMI groups: pSFA Group 4 versus Groups 1, 2, and 3 (18.92 vs 7.08 %, p = 0.037) and patients with BMI ≥35 kg/m2 versus BMI <35 kg/m2 (16.67 % vs 4.76 %, p = 0.016). There was no significant difference seen in any group for major reoperation. Finally, there were no significant differences in OR time, length of stay, disposition, readmission, venous thromboembolism events, fractures, arthrofibrosis, or functional outcomes among pSFA and BMI groups.

Table 3 Demographics and baseline characteristics based on pSFA and BMI groups.
Age (Avg, 95 % CI) Sex (female, %) BMI (Avg, 95 % CI) Comorbidities
Diabetes (%) Current Smoking (%) ASA III/IV (%)
pSFA
Group 1 (n = 37) 65.32 (62.51–68.14) 2.7 30.08 (28.72–31.44) 29.73 27.03 51.35
Group 2 (n = 38) 64.76 (61.81–67.71) 50 32.62 (30.55–34.68) 13.16 23.68 47.37
Group 3 (n = 83) 63.97 (60.62–67.32) 89.47 34.93 (33.01–36.85) 39.47 18.42 68.42
Group 4 (n = 37) 61.73 (58.53–64.92) 100 39.53 (37.84–41.22) 29.73 16.22 59.46
p-value 0.397 <0.001 <0.001 0.081 0.722 0.209
BMI
<25 (n = 7) 72.57 (64.18–80.96) 57.14 23.10 (22.05–24.15) 14.29 14.29 57.14
25–30 (n = 42) 66.33 (63.42–69.24) 52.38 28.08 (27.65–28.52) 23.81 26.19 40.48
30–35 (n = 35) 64.66 (61.47–74.27) 54.29 32.36 (31.86–33.90) 25.71 25.71 48.57
35–40 (n = 34) 62.62 (59.87–65.37) 70.59 37.46 (36.87–38.05) 29.41 23.53 67.65
>40 (n = 32) 59.59 (56.57–62.62) 68.75 43.59 (42.48–44.69) 37.5 9.38 75
p-value 0.003 0.390 <0.001 0.631 0.313 0.022
Table 4 Other complications and clinical outcomes based on pSFA and BMI.
Total (N = 150) pSFA quartiles BMI
Group 1 (N = 37) Group 2 (N = 38) Group 3 (N = 38) Group 4 (N = 37) P value <25 (N = 7) 25-30 (N = 42) 30-35 (N = 35) 35-40 (N = 34) >40 (N = 32) P value
Follow up (years)Mean (95 % CI) 1.38 (1.34–1.42) 1.38 (1.29–1.46) 1.34 (1.27–1.41) 1.39 (1.32–1.45) 1.43 (1.35–1.52) 0.410 1.42 (1.21–1.63) 1.38 (1.31–1.45) 1.37 (1.29–1.45) 1.33 (1.25–1.41) 1.46 (1.37–1.54) 0.320
OR time (min)Mean (95 % CI) 127.63 (124.28–130.99) 133.08 (128.41–137.75) 126.29 (117.66–134.91) 124.82 (119.13–131.50) 126.46 (120.40–132.52) 0.328 132.29 (127.27–137.30) 124.31 (119.33–129.29) 125.54 (120.43–130.66) 124.00 (118.23–129.77) 137.13 (125.98–148.27) 0.051
Length of stay (days)Mean (95 % CI) 1.38 (1.27–1.49) 1.51 (1.16–1.87) 1.29 (1.14–1.44) 1.37 (1.20–1.54) 1.35 (1.18–1.52) 0.404 1.29 (0.92–1.65) 1.52 (1.22–1.82) 1.40 (1.22–1.58) 1.29 (1.10–1.49) 1.28 (1.10–1.46) 0.535
Disposition (% of going to skilled nursing facility, n) 2.67 % (4) 5.41 % (2) 0 % (0) 0 % (0) 5.41 % (2) 0.239 0 % (0) 2.44 % (1) 0 % (0) 2.94 % (1) 6.25 % (2) 0.599
Hemoglobin drop (g/dl)Mean (95 % CI) 2.34 (2.19–2.48) 2.60 (2.34–2.86) 2.13 (1.87–2.40) 2.19 (1.93–2.46) 2.43 (2.09–2.77) 0.098 2.44 (1.43–3.45) 2.53 (2.29–2.77) 2.33 (2.09–2.58) 2.18 (1.25–1.41) 2.23 (1.93–2.54) 0.486
ER visit (%, n) 15.33 % (23) 13.51 % (5) 2.63 % (1) 28.95 % (11) 16.22 % (6) 0.016 0 % (0) 11.90 % (5) 11.43 % (4) 23.53 % (8) 18.75 % (6) 0.392
Readmission (%, n) 4.67 % (7) 0 % (0) 2.63 % (1) 7.89 % (3) 8.11 % (3) 0.257 0 % (0) 2.44 % (1) 5.71 % (2) 8.82 % (3) 3.13 % (1) 0.660
VTE (%, n) 0 % (0) 0 % (0) 0 % (0) 0 % (0) 0 % (0) 0 % (0) 0 % (0) 0 % (0) 0 % (0) 0 % (0)
Fracture (%, n) 0.67 % (1) 0 % (0) 2.63 % (1) 0 % (0) 0 % (0) 0.397 0 % (0) 0 % (0) 0 % (0) 2.94 % (1) 0 % (0) 0.488
Arthrofibrosis (%, n) 6 % (9) 5.41 % (2) 5.26 % (2) 2.63 % (1) 10.81 % (4) 0.504 0 % (0) 4.76 % (2) 2.94 % (1) 11.76 % (4) 6.25 % (2) 0.528
Return to OR
Any surgery (%, n) 10 % (15) 5.41 % (2) 10.53 % (4) 5.26 % (2) 18.92 % (7) 0.165 0 % (0) 6.98 % (3) 2.86 % (1) 17.65 % (6) 15.63 % (5) 0.166
Major surgery (%, n) 3.33 % (5) 0 % (0) 5.26 % (2) 2.63 % (1) 5.41 % (2) 0.519 0 % (0) 2.44 % (1) 0 % (0) 5.88 % (2) 6.25 % (2) 0.542
Minor surgery (%, n) 6.67 % (10) 5.41 % (2) 5.26 % (2) 2.63 % (1) 13.51 % (5) 0.262 0 % (0) 4.76 % (2) 2.86 % (1) 11.76 % (4) 9.38 % (3) 0.500
3.4

3.4 Confounding variables

Findings from chi-square test and multivariate regression analysis of possible confounding variables (gender, surgeon, bleeding disorder, smoking diabetes, ASA, cemented vs cementless, age, preop albumin, OR time) are tabulated in Table 5. ASA was the only confounding variable that demonstrated statistical significance: patients with ASA III/IV had a higher wound complication rate compared with patients with ASA I/II (18.82 vs 3.08 %, p = 0.003). Higher wound complications were seen in diabetic patients versus non-diabetic patients; however, this difference was not statistically significant (19.05 vs 9.26 %, p = 0.098). From multivariate regression analysis, ASA III/IV was again significantly associated with high wound complications with odds ratio 9.80 (p = 0.008). Other variables were not significantly associated with wound complications.

Table 5 Chi-square test and multivariate regression analysis of confounding variables.
Chi-square test Multivariate Regression Analysis
Total (N = 150) No wound complication (N = 132) Wound complication (N = 18) P-value Odds ratio P-value
Gender 0.636 1.16 0.808
Male 59 51 (86.44 %) 8 (13.56 %)
Female 91 81 (89.01 %) 10 (10.99 %)
Surgeon (n, %) 0.644 0.642
1 49 43 (87.76 %) 6 (12.24 %)
2 5 4 (80 %) 1 (20 %)
3 63 58 (92.06 %) 5 (7.94 %)
4 27 22 (81.48 %) 5 (18.52 %)
5 6 5 (83.33 %) 1 (16.67 %)
Bleeding disorder 0.401 0.00 0.999
No 145 127 (87.59 %) 18 (12.41 %)
Yes 5 5 (100 %) 0 (0 %)
Smoking 0.922 1.12 0.829
No 118 104 (88.14 %) 14 (11.86 %)
Yes 32 28 (87.5 %) 4 (12.5 %)
Diabetes 0.098 2.98 0.100
No 108 98 (90.74 %) 10 (9.26 %)
Yes 42 34 (80.95 %) 8 (19.05 %)
ASA 0.003 9.80 0.008
I or II 65 63 (97 %) 2 (3 %)
III or IV 85 69 (81 %) 16 (19 %)
Cement 0.154 3.55 0.216
Cemented 105 95 (90.48 %) 10 (9.52 %)
Cementless 45 37 (82.22 %) 8 (17.78 %)
Age (yrs)a 64.1 ± 9.6 63.1 ± 10.1 0.694 0.99 0.671
Preop albumin (g/dL)a 4.2 ± 0.3 4.2 ± 0.3 0.626 1.39 0.729
OR time (min)a 127.4 ± 20.4 129.5 ± 25.3 0.688 1.01 0.494
Mean ± SD.
3.5

3.5 Other relevant finding: gender difference in fat distribution

Interestingly, as seen in Table 3, only 2.7 % of pSFA Group 1 patients were female compared with 89.47 % in Group 3 and 100 % in Group 4 (p < 0.001). On the other hand, there is an even distribution of females throughout all BMI groups. Mean BMI of females in our study was marginally higher than the mean BMI of males (35.31 ± 6.81 vs 32.97 ± 5.84 kg/m2, p = 0.047), but the mean pSFA of females was almost 3 times larger than the mean pSFA of males (9.31 ± 4.49 vs 3.31 ± 1.69, p < 0.001).

4

4 Discussion

Obesity measured by BMI has been extensively studied as a risk factor for various complications including wound complications following TKA.5,14–16 However, Waisbren et al. demonstrated that percentage of body fat is a better predictor of surgical site infection than BMI.17 As a result, the local fat milieu of the surgical site has been studied in general surgery,18–20 spine surgery,6,7 and TKA8–10 as an important component of wound healing. In TKA, standard radiographs have been used to evaluate the local fat content by measuring prepatellar subcutaneous fat thickness.8–10 This two-dimensional measurement, however, is prone to error and inaccuracy. With recent advancements in robotic-assisted surgery, CT images of TKA patients are now readily available and as suggested in this study, be utilized for accurate and reliable measurement of a patient's periarticular subcutaneous fat area. By focusing on representative axial CT images at surgical sites, we demonstrated that moderate amounts of subcutaneous fat tissue around the knee are associated with better clinical outcomes, less wound complications, and less emergency room visits compared with deficient or excessive amounts of periarticular subcutaneous fat tissue. Furthermore, we found a gender difference in subcutaneous fat distribution: more women were found to have excessive subcutaneous fat around their knees than men despite having similar BMIs.

This study, however, had a number of limitations. First, our cohort of 150 patients had a high average BMI of 34.28 kg/m2 with no patients having a BMI of less than 18.5 kg/m2. Thus, our findings are specific to a more obese population. Second, we decided to divide each SCF measurement into quartiles to study the effect of deficient, moderate, and excessive fat content on wound complications. Due to the small sample size with high average BMI, our thresholds used to divide the cohort into quartiles are biased and required further studies with a bigger sample. Third, patient reported outcomes (PROs) are not included in this study because they were insufficiently collected. We do not know the effect of SCF on PROs. Fourth, multiple surgeons were involved in this study and strict standardization of perioperative protocol was not followed. However, using multivariate regression analysis, we did not find any statistically significant differences among surgeons. Fifth, the retrospective nature of this study created inherent selection bias and was limited by the information recorded in the electronic chart. Finally, semi-automated subcutaneous fat area measurements using region-of-interest functionality can have systematic errors depending on the quality of CT scan and user errors based upon pixel selection, axial CT slice selection, and adjustment of standard deviation in ROI. That being said, we made every effort to standardize our measurements and had two observers to measure SCF area independently.

Despite these limitations, we were able to demonstrate highly accurate subcutaneous fat area measurements with excellent interobserver reliability. All the normalized SCF area measurements at 3 different levels had ICC greater than 0.986. However, when we attempted to measure normalized prepatellar fat thickness at the mid-patella level, ICC inter-observer reliability was only moderate (0.741). There may have been inconsistency in selecting CT axial slices that match the “mid-patella” as well as in measuring a perpendicular distance from the patella to the skin. Presence of osteophytes and eburnation may have contributed to the inconsistency as well. Watts et al. measured prepatellar and pre tubercular fat thickness using lateral radiographs with surprisingly high inter-rater reliability (Pearson's coefficient of 0.92 and 0.96, respectively).8 On the other hand, inter-rater reliability was not evaluated in Wagner and Yu studies.9,10 We believe that measurement of the entire SCF area is less prone to technical error and more representative of the local fat milieu than simply measuring fat thickness. We suspect that development of an algorithm to calculate the entire three-dimensional volumetric measurement of SCF would lead to an even more precise, clinically relevant measurement.

Our study is the first study to show that both small and large amounts of subcutaneous fat are associated with wound complications following TKA. All previous studies linked excessive adipose tissue to higher wound complications and infection.6–10,18–20 Complications associated with smaller amounts of subcutaneous fat in our study were minor wound complications as reoperation did not occur in this group of patients. Cellulitis and suture abscesses constituted the majority of wound complications within this group. This finding implies that a certain amount of fatty tissue is protective with respect to wound complications. On the other end of the spectrum, excessive subcutaneous tissue in the leg was associated not only with an increase in wound complications but also with major complications requiring reoperation. Compromised immune system function has been theorized as a leading cause of increased infection in patients with abundant subcutaneous tissue as described by both Watts et al. and Wagner et al. Furthermore, a growing body of evidence has shown that malnutrition and surgical site infection are associated.21–23 Both deficient and excessive subcutaneous fatty tissues should be considered when evaluating the malnutrition of a patient with chronically compromised immunity. Further studies are needed to determine the upper and lower thresholds of subcutaneous fat that result in a higher risk of wound complications.

Surprisingly, our study also demonstrated that the pSFA Group 2 had a significantly lower emergency room visit compared with other groups. The rate of 90-day emergency room visits following primary TKA in our study was comparable to the study by Kelly et al. (15.33 % vs 13.8 %).24 Our study showed an even distribution of orthopedic-related (47.8 %) and medical-related (52.2 %) reasons for ED visits with the majority of the orthopedic-related reasons being post-operative pain. To the authors' knowledge, there is no study demonstrating a certain body composition as having lower complications (such as ED visits) following primary total joint arthroplasty. However, Black et al. found that malnutrition is associated with increased readmission and ED visits following total joint arthroplasty.25 Again, if we consider deficient and excessive subcutaneous fatty tissue around the knee as two sides of malnutrition, our findings are consistent with Black et al.’s findings. Further investigation is needed to confirm this relationship.

Finally, our study demonstrated a gender difference in body composition – females demonstrated a greater localization of excessive fat tissue in their lower extremities when compared to that of males. This is consistent with other studies that have demonstrated that females have up to twice as much thigh subcutaneous fat than males which is speculated to contribute to gender differences in physical performance as well as knee loading.26–31 Differing body composition, however, did not predict differences in surgical outcomes as our study did not find any gender differences in either wound or any other complication. Further studies are warranted to look at gender differences in wound complications following total knee arthroplasty.

In conclusion, the subcutaneous fat area around the knee can be accurately and reliably measured on CT axial images using dedicated computer software. Our study further demonstrated that there is a gender difference in thigh subcutaneous fat area and that both deficient and excessive fatty tissue at the surgical site of total knee arthroplasty are associated with an increase in wound complications and emergency room visits.

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Young M. Jee: Conceptualization, Resources, Data curation, Writing – review & editing. Mazen Zamzam: Methodology, Investigation, Writing – original draft, preparation. Sazid Hasan: Software, Validation. Muhammad A. Waheed: Formal analysis, All authors have read and agreed to the published. Ehab S. Saleh: Validation, Visualization. Abdullah M. Omari: Conceptualization, Validation, Supervision, Project administration.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Institutional Review Board approval was obtained to perform a retrospective review at Corewell Health Hospital with reference number 2019-067.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Availability of data and methods

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

Funding

No funding was needed for this study.

References

  1. , , , , . Prevalence of Obesity Among Adults and Youth: United States, 2015–2016. NCHS Data Brief, No 288. 2017;vol. 288:2015-2016.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. , , , , , . The effects of obesity and morbid obesity on outcomes in TKA. J Knee Surg. 2013;26(2):83-88.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. , , , , . Complication rates after hip or knee arthroplasty in morbidly obese patients. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013;471(10):3358-3366.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. , . The influence of obesity on the outcome of TKR: can the impact of obesity be justified from the viewpoint of the overall Health care system? HSS J. 2014;10(2):167-170.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. , , , , , . Body mass index more than 45 kg/m(2) as a cutoff point is associated with dramatically increased postoperative complications in total knee arthroplasty and total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2016;31(4):749-753.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. , , , et al . 2012 young investigator award winner: the distribution of body mass as a significant risk factor for lumbar spinal fusion postoperative infections. Spine. 2012;37(19):1652-1656.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. , , , et al . Thickness of subcutaneous fat as a risk factor for infection in cervical spine fusion surgery. J Bone Jt Surgery-American. 2013;95(4):323-328.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. , , , , . Subcutaneous fat thickness is associated with early reoperation and infection after total knee arthroplasty in morbidly obese patients. J Arthroplasty. 2016;31(8):1788-1791.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. , , , , , . The radiographic prepatellar fat thickness ratio correlates with infection risk after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2018;33(7):2251-2255.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. , , , , , , . Periarticular soft tissue envelope size and postoperative wound complications following total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2018;33(7S):S249-S252.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. , , , . Robotics in total knee arthroplasty. J Knee Surg March 2019
    [Google Scholar]
  12. , , , , , . Robotic-arm assisted total knee arthroplasty is associated with improved early functional recovery and reduced time to hospital discharge compared with conventional jig-based total knee arthroplasty. Bone Jt J. 2018;100B(7):930-937.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. , , , , . Visceral adiposity and hepatic steatosis at abdominal CT: association with the metabolic syndrome. Am J Roentgenol 2012
    [Google Scholar]
  14. , , , , , , . The effect of BMI on 30 Day outcomes following total joint arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2015;30(7):1113-1117.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. , , , , , , . Association between body mass index and thirty-day complications after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2018
    [Google Scholar]
  16. , , , , , , . Percent body fat and prediction of surgical site infection. J Am Coll Surg 2010
    [Google Scholar]
  17. , , , et al . Thickness of subcutaneous fat as a strong risk factor for wound infections in elective colorectal surgery: impact of prediction using preoperative CT. Dig Surg. 2010;27(4):331-335.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. , , , et al . Surgical site infection and analytic morphometric assessment of body composition in patients undergoing midline laparotomy. J Am Coll Surg 2011
    [Google Scholar]
  19. , , , et al . Use of morphometric assessment of body composition to quantify risk of surgical-site infection in patients undergoing component separation ventral hernia repair. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014;133(4):559-566.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. , , , . Preoperative nutritional status of total joint patients: relationship to postoperative wound complications. J Arthroplasty 1991
    [Google Scholar]
  21. , , , et al . Association of malnutrition with periprosthetic joint and surgical site infections after total joint arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Hosp Infect 2019
    [Google Scholar]
  22. , , , , , . Procrastination of wound drainage and malnutrition affect the outcome of joint arthroplasty. 2008
    [Google Scholar]
  23. , , , , , , . Reasons for ninety-day emergency visits and readmissions after elective total joint arthroplasty: results from a US integrated healthcare system. J Arthroplasty. 2018;33(7):2075-2081.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. , , , et al . The role of malnutrition in ninety-day outcomes after total joint arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2019
    [Google Scholar]
  25. , , , , . Quantitative relationship of thigh adipose tissue with pain, radiographic status, and progression of knee osteoarthritis: longitudinal findings from the osteoarthritis initiative. Invest Radiol 2015
    [Google Scholar]
  26. , , , et al . Longitudinal study of muscle strength, quality, and adipose tissue infiltration. Am J Clin Nutr 2009
    [Google Scholar]
  27. , , , et al . Body composition explains sex differential in physical performance among older adults. Journals Gerontol - Ser A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2014
    [Google Scholar]
  28. , , , , , , . Sex differences in the association of thigh fat and metabolic risk in older adults. Obesity 2011
    [Google Scholar]
  29. , , , , , , . Sex-differences of the healthy infra-patellar (Hoffa) fat pad in relation to intermuscular and subcutaneous fat content - data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative. Ann Anat 2015
    [Google Scholar]
  30. , , , , , . Is local or central adiposity more strongly associated with incident knee osteoarthritis than the body mass index in men or women? Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2018
    [Google Scholar]
Show Sections