Translate this page into:
Management of severe scoliosis in patients with Turner's syndrome: A case series
∗Corresponding author: Manasa Pagadala. manasa.pagadala@northwestern.edu
-
Received: ,
Accepted: ,
This article was originally published by Reed Elsevier India Pvt. Ltd. and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.
Abstract
Abstract
The prevalence and treatment of severe scoliosis and other spinal anomalies in patients with Turner's syndrome (TS) is not well reported. This is the largest case series to date regarding the treatment course and outcomes of severely scoliotic TS patients.
A retrospective chart review was performed to identify all patients with TS seen at a single center academic pediatric institution from 2007 to 2021. Of these, the presence of concomitant severe scoliosis or other spinal anomalies was determined, defined by a major coronal curve measuring 45° or greater. Demographic, clinical, surgical, and radiologic data was collected at both pre- and post-intervention time points.
A retrospective chart review identified 306 patients with TS. Of those, six were identified to have severe scoliosis or other severe spinal anomalies requiring fusion. All four posterior spinal fusion (PSF) patients demonstrated improvement of their spinal curvature. One patient who electively pursued only bracing demonstrated minimal improvement and surgery was subsequently recommended, but not pursued. One patient expired from a pre-existing heart condition prior to intervention. All postoperative complications resolved with no further complications. The only brace-related complication was an allergic rash related to the brace material.
All four patients who underwent PSF demonstrated significant improvement of their spinal curvature with few post-surgical complications. None of the patients in the bracing cohort demonstrated stabilization of their spinal curvature. Therefore, these data corroborate with prior studies, suggesting that operative management consisting of spinal fusion with instrumentation provides optimal clinical outcomes, compared to bracing only.
Keywords
Scoliosis
Turner's syndrome
Bracing
Spinal fusion
Surgical outcomes
1 Introduction
Turner syndrome (TS), the most common chromosomal abnormality to occur in females, occurs in approximately one in 2000 to one in 2500 live births and is defined as the complete or partial absence of a single sex chromosome.1 TS clinically manifests across several systems; regarding orthopaedic etiologies, the most common sequelae include scoliosis, thoracic hyperkyphosis, short stature, slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE), Madelung deformity, and early-onset osteoporosis.1,2
Patients with TS are at increased risk for developing spinal deformities and the age at risk tends to be more protracted than the general population. Scoliosis is defined by the age of onset, etiology of the curve, and plane of the spine. Although the incidence of scoliosis varies by study, the established range in TS patients has been reported to be as high as 10–59%, compared to 1–4% in the general population of children ages 10–16 years old.2–8
Prior studies report that approximately 10% of adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis will progress to a level requiring consideration of surgery.2 In this retrospective review of 306 TS patients, 37 (12%) had scoliosis, with six of the 37 (16%) patients having severe curvatures or vertebral anomalies that were deemed eligible for surgery. Four patients of those with scoliosis (11%) underwent fusion. This is in contrast to prior pooled studies which report a 7% rate of TS patients undergoing fusion procedures for scoliosis.4–6,8
Clinical outcomes of these patients undergoing various treatment modalities have not been reported in depth in the literature and is the purpose of this study to do so. A retrospective chart review was performed to identify 306 patients with TS seen at a single center academic pediatric institution from 2007 to 2021. TS cases were then cross referenced for the presence of concomitant severe scoliosis, defined by a major coronal curve measuring 45° or greater. Six patients were identified to have severe scoliosis. Of those, four patients proceeded with PSF with instrumentation and one patient underwent bracing only. One patient died from pre-existing cardiac conditions and did not obtain treatment prior to expiring. Demographic, clinical, and surgical data was collected for all patients across time; pre and post-intervention radiologic images and coronal curve measurements were obtained, if applicable. Interventions were conducted at this institution or outside institutions. Data regarding adjuvant treatments used such as growth hormone or estrogen was also collected. Patient demographics are demonstrated in Table 1. Treatment modalities and relevant clinical outcomes are demonstrated in Table 2. Intraoperative events for Patients 1 to 4 are detailed in Table 3.
| Patient ID | Gender | Age at Diagnosis of Scoliosis (yrs) | Age at time of intervention (yrs) | Comorbidities |
| 1 | F | 3 | 8 | Pierre Robin Sequence, congenital heart defects, portosystemic venous shunt, chronic kidney disease (stage 1), developmental delay, gastric tube dependence |
| 2 | F | – | 19 | Unilateral blindness 2° bilateral retinoblastoma, kidney reflux, deep venous thrombosis, supraventricular tachycardia |
| 3 | F | 14 | 14 | Supraventricular tachycardia |
| 4 | F | 4 | 4 | Gonadal dysgenesis s/p oophorectomy, hypothyroidism |
| 5 | F | 8 | 8 | Autism spectrum disorder |
| 6 | F | 13 | – | Juvenile idiopathic arthritis, aortic aneurysm, aortic coarctation, aortic stenosis |
| Patient ID | Conservative management attempted? | Pre-Treatment Coronal Curve Angle | Treatment Modality | Post-Treatment Coronal Curve Angle | Follow-up Coronal Curve Angle | Adjuvant Therapies (growth hormone, steroids, etc.) | Complications |
| 1 | TLSO for 6 years (8–10 h/day) | 105° | PSF (T2-L3) | 85° | 85° | None | Constipation, SQ soft tissue emphysema, pleural effusion |
| 2 | PT, TLSO brace (8–10 h/night) for 6 years | 64° | PSF (T2-L1) | 50° | 50° | GH (7 yrs), estrogen (4 yrs) | Headaches, back pain |
| 3 | None | 46° | PSF | 19° | 18° | GH (7.6 yrs), estrogen (unspecified duration) | None |
| 4 | Fiberglass spinal brace 8 mo post-op | UTO | PSF (T9-T11) | UTO | UTO | GH (1.75 yrs), estrogen (17 yrs) | Allergic reaction to brace material |
| 5 | Traction Chair, ScoliBrace® (3–4 h/night) for 3 years from chiropractor | 66° | ScoliBrace® from chiropractor | 76.7° | n/a | None | None |
| 6 | None | 34.0°a | None | 45.1°a | n/a | GH (12 yrs), estrogen (1 yr) | – |
2 Methods
2.1 Study design
A retrospective chart review was performed to identify all patients with TS seen at a single center academic pediatric institution from 2007 to 2021 (see Table 1). Of these, inclusion criteria was defined by the presence of concomitant severe scoliosis or other spinal anomalies, defined by a major coronal curve of 45° or greater. Patients with no history of scoliosis or major coronal curves less than 45° were excluded. Coronal curve angles were measured by two independent reviewers. If measured angles differed by greater than 5°, a third reviewer was utilized. Demographic, clinical, surgical, and radiologic data was collected at both pre- and post-intervention time points for all patients with TS who presented with severe scoliosis or other spinal anomalies. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago. The requirement for informed consent was waived for this retrospective study. We queried the hospital's electronic medical record (EPIC ®) for patient's diagnosed with Turner syndrome from 2007 to 2021 by using search terms “Turner syndrome” and “Gonadal dysgenesis”, as well as querying for ICD9 and ICD10 codes of 758.6 and q96.9, which represented gonadal dysgenesis and TS diagnoses respectively. Exclusion criteria included patients that did not have a confirmed TS karyotype, TS mosaicism, or TS phenotype diagnosis after chart review, or patients that were seen remotely in the academic center by other subspecialists who were not screened for scoliosis and did not follow up in the Endocrine or Orthopaedic clinics.
3 Participants
3.1 Patient 1
Patient 1 presented as a three year-old female with TS (karyotype: 45, X). She was diagnosed with congenital thoracolumbar scoliosis at three years old and was managed with a thoracic lumbar sacral orthosis (TLSO) brace 8–10 h a day for six years. Despite TLSO bracing, follow-up radiographic imaging demonstrated worsening spinal curvatures, prompting a recommendation for a PSF which was performed at eight years old at our institution from T2-L3 with 5.5 mm titanium DePuy© instrumentation, 5-level posterior vertebral Ponte osteotomy, autograft, and allograft. Post-operatively, her radiographs revealed a major coronal curve measuring 85°, indicating stabilization of her spinal curvature compared to her preoperative major coronal curve measuring 105° (Table 2). Follow up coronal curvature 2 years post-operatively remained stable at 85°. Postoperative complications included mild subcutaneous emphysema within the soft tissues of the upper back and a small pleural effusion tracking along the right hemithorax and intermittent constipation. Recovery was otherwise uneventful and the patient was followed for six months postoperatively with no residual pain.
3.2 Patient 2
Patient 2 presented as an eleven year-old female with TS (Karyotype: 45X/46 Xi(Xq)), and leftward curvature of the upper thoracic spine from T1 to T4 with a major coronal curve measuring 64° (Table 2; Fig. 1). She also endorsed a history of daily mid to low back pain for an unspecified duration. Her scoliosis was initially managed with physical therapy once a month and TLSO bracing for 8–10 h a night for six years. After five years of bracing, the patient reported her back pain had resolved. One year later, however, the patient was recommended to undergo PSF due to worsening spinal curvatures despite bracing and physical therapy.

At 19 years old, the patient underwent a PSF at our institution from T2-L1 with 5.5 mm titanium DePuy© instrumentation, 5-level posterior vertebral Ponte osteotomy, autograft, and allograft with no perioperative complications. Postoperatively, her radiographs revealed a major coronal curve measuring 50°, improving from her preoperative coronal curve of 64° (Table 2; Fig. 1). Follow up coronal curvature was stable at 50° 3 days after surgery. No further follow-up imaging was done following this. After surgery, the patient reported occasional upper thoracic pain that was adequately controlled with oxycodone, diazepam, and acetaminophen. She was able to walk 20–30 min per day without difficulty. Three months after surgery, the patient began to report daily, intermittent head and backaches, which were adequately controlled with ibuprofen and acetaminophen. Recovery was otherwise uneventful and the patient was followed for nine months postoperatively.
3.3 Patient 3
Patient 3 presented as a 14 year-old female with a history of TS (karyotype: not specified) and scoliosis diagnosed at the age of 14 (Table 1). During her initial evaluation at this institution, the patient was recommended to undergo PSF, which she underwent within the same year at a different institution. No other treatment modalities were attempted. Preoperative radiographs demonstrated a major coronal curve measuring 46° (Table 2). Postoperative radiographs demonstrated a coronal curve measuring 19° measured from the superior endplate of T10 and the superior endplate of T4, suggesting not only stabilization, but improvement of her scoliosis (Table 2). Follow up coronal curvature 2 months after surgery showed slight improvement at 18°.Recovery was uneventful and the patient continued to be followed for two years with no reported complications.
3.4 Patient 4
Patient 4 presented as a four year-old female with a history of TS (Karyotype: 45, X) and gonadal dysgenesis after undergoing a PSF from T9 to T11 performed at an outside institution. She was originally incidentally diagnosed with congenital kyphosis at the T10 level that same year when a CT scan was performed to evaluate streak ovaries related to her TS. Preoperative radiographs and CT demonstrated a posterior displacement of the T10 vertebral body, secondary to congenital shortening, and a congenital bony anomaly of T10 with a bone defect involving the anterior portion of the vertebral body, resulting in mild kyphosis. One week later, she underwent PSF from T9-T11 with in situ homogenous femoral head grafts to the spine with no postoperative complications.
As radiographic images were unable to be obtained for this patient, the radiologist report was utilized, detailing a slight right thoracic curvature with hemivertebra at T10 with anterior subluxation of the T9 vertebral body on T10. A fiberglass spinal brace was used for eight months following the surgery but was discontinued due to an allergic skin rash from the brace material.
4 Bracing
4.1 Patient 5
Patient 5 presented as an eight year-old female with a history of TS (Karyotype: not specified) and spinal asymmetry which was first noted at the age of 8 at an outside institution. Her scoliosis was initially managed with a Boston brace for 23 h each day for five years starting at age eight. The patient first presented to our institution at 13 years old, with radiographs demonstrating a major coronal curve measuring 66° (Table 2). The patient was unable to tolerate this rigorous bracing protocol and the parents chose to transfer her care to a chiropractor for further management.
Five years after her initial scoliosis diagnosis, reevaluation revealed a convex right curvature of the thoracic and upper lumbar spine with a major coronal curve measuring 66° measured from T3 to L2 (Table 2; Fig. 2). There was also a convex left curvature of the mid to lower lumbar spine with a Cobb angle of 32˘ measured from L2 to L5. It was determined that the severity of her spinal curvature was unlikely to be stabilized with bracing even if she were able to tolerate it. According to the evaluating orthopedist at re-evaluation, her bone age was greater than 10 and warranted a PSF in order to stabilize and improve her spinal curvature. However, the parents declined surgical intervention and elected to continue care with the chiropractor. The chiropractor subsequently recommended a ScoliBrace® in the morning and use of a Traction Chair (Table 2).

At a subsequent follow-up visit eight months later, radiographs demonstrated a stable 60° right thoracic curve. She was recommended to continue with the prior bracing protocol as her curve was essentially unchanged compared to previous radiographs, and even mildly improved. It was discussed that eventually she would require PSF from T3 down to L3 or L4 if her spinal curvature worsened. Five years after her initial diagnosis of scoliosis, subsequent radiographs taken during chiropractic follow-up visits demonstrated continued progression of her scoliosis, with a Cobb angle of 76.7° (Table 2; Fig. 2). The patient's family refused treatment with growth hormone.
4.2 Patient 6
Patient 6 presented to our institution as a 13 years old female with a history of TS (45, X). Upon initial presentation to our institution, radiographic imaging revealed a Cobb angle of 34.0° with a 30° thoracic curve (Table 2). A brace was recommended but not obtained due to potential for heart surgery at the time. Ten months after her initial presentation, repeat radiographic imaging revealed her thoracic dextroscoliosis to be essentially unchanged, as demonstrated by a Cobb angle of 36.6°. Upon reevaluation three years later, repeat radiographic imaging demonstrated progression of her scoliosis, with a right thoracic curvature of 47° and a Cobb angle of 45.1°, but relatively stable kyphosis at 52° (Table 2). It was determined to be at such a magnitude that bracing was no longer appropriate. Observation was recommended as surgery was contraindicated due to her cardiac history. The patient eventually died at the age of 18 years due to exacerbation of her pre-existing cardiac conditions.
5 Variables
The primary outcome explored was pre- and post-treatment coronal curve angles. Additionally, adjuvant therapies and post-intervention complications were explored as secondary outcomes.
6 Data sources/management
Pre- and post-intervention radiographs were selected based on time points closest to the relevant intervention. Coronal curve angles were taken from the standardized measurement reported from the radiologist's final report in the patient's chart.
7 Bias
Coronal curve angles were measured by two independent reviewers. If measured angles differed by greater than 5°, a third reviewer was utilized.
8 Study size
A retrospective chart review was performed to identify all patients with TS seen at a single center academic pediatric institution from 2007 to 2021. Of these, inclusion criteria was defined by the presence of concomitant severe scoliosis or other spinal anomalies, defined by a major coronal curve of 45° or greater. Patients with no history of scoliosis or major coronal curves less than 45° were excluded. This yielded six patients total that were included in this study.
9 Statistical method
Statistics not analysed given case series format.
10 Results
10.1 Participants
A retrospective chart review was performed to identify 306 patients with TS seen at a single center academic pediatric institution from 2007 to 2021. TS cases were then cross referenced for the presence of concomitant severe scoliosis, defined by a major coronal curve measuring 45° or greater. Six patients were identified to have severe idiopathic type or congenital scoliosis.
11 Descriptive data
Of those, four patients proceeded with PSF with instrumentation and one patient underwent bracing only. One patient died from pre-existing cardiac conditions and did not obtain treatment prior to expiring.
12 Outcome data
Demographic, clinical, and surgical data was collected for all patients across time; pre and post-intervention radiologic images and coronal curve measurements were obtained, if applicable. Interventions were conducted at this institution or outside institutions. Data regarding adjuvant treatments used such as growth hormone or estrogen was also collected. Patient demographics are demonstrated in Table 1. Treatment modalities and relevant clinical outcomes are demonstrated in Table 2.
13 Presentation
| Patient ID | Gender | EBL (mL) | Implant Type | Scoliosis Reduction Maneuvers |
| 1 | F | 260 | Transverse process hook, pedicle screws, rod | minimal rod rotation, translational correction without excessive strain |
| 2 | F | 120 | Transverse process hook, pedicle screws, rod | rod rotation ∼60°, translation of the coronal scoliosis to neutral sagittal profile, minimal DVR was required for torsional component |
| 3 | F | n/a | n/a | n/a |
| 4 | F | n/a | Metal clips | n/a |
14 Discussion
14.1 Key results
The prevalence, treatment, and subsequent clinical outcomes of scoliosis and other spinal anomalies in TS is an underexplored topic, resulting in a critical gap in the literature. The prevalence of TS spinal deformity was 12% in our recent cohort of 306 patients queried from a retrospective chart review at a single pediatric academic referral center. PSF rates for severe spinal deformity patients were 11% and bracing rates were 10.5%. Of the 306 patients identified to have a diagnosis of TS, six were determined to have severe scoliosis or kyphosis secondary to a congenital spinal anomaly, in the case of Patient 4. Of these six patients, four underwent PSF, one utilized bracing only, and one was lost to follow up. In one case (Patient 4), a brace was used postoperatively to stabilize the spine and assist with walking. In Patients 1 and 2, bracing was utilized as the initial intervention, but both of these patients eventually elected to pursue a PSF.
All patients who underwent PSF demonstrated significant improvement in their spinal curvatures after surgery. Patient 1 demonstrated a postoperative Cobb angle of 85°, improving from her preoperative Cobb angle of 105°. Patient 2 demonstrated improvement in her rightward mid thoracic curve with preoperative and postoperative Cobb angles measuring 64° and 45°, respectively. Patient 3 demonstrated a postoperative Cobb angle of 19°, improving from her preoperative Cobb angle of 46°. Although Cobb angles were unable to be obtained for Patient 4, available radiologic reports and orthopaedic assessments deemed her spine to show subjective improvement after surgery.
Regarding bracing, Patient 5 demonstrated worsening of her spinal curvature despite 3–4 h of daily brace use, with Cobb angles of 66° and 76.7°, taken five years apart. However, orthopaedic assessment continued to recommend surgical intervention in the future, as the patient's spinal curvature was likely to progress even after skeletal maturity was reached. Patient 6 was recommended to begin bracing after radiographic imaging revealed a 30° thoracic curve and Cobb angle of 34.0°. However, bracing was deferred at this time due to the patient's upcoming cardiac surgery. As her spinal curvature eventually progressed, as demonstrated by repeat radiographic imaging showing a Cobb angle of 45.1°, the brace was eventually discontinued based on its magnitude.
Postoperative complications occurred in two patients in the PSF cohort. Complications were defined as adverse events that were not typical for the treatment course. Patient 1 was reported to have subcutaneous soft tissue emphysema, pleural effusion and intermittent constipation, while Patient 2 was reported to have intermittent headaches. All complications eventually resolved with no further complications at subsequent postoperative follow up visits. Patients who underwent bracing demonstrated no complications other than an allergic rash related to the brace material.
15 Limitations & strength
Limitations regarding this study include the retrospective nature of data collection, as all data was extracted utilizing patient charts. Additionally, many of the procedures were conducted at institutions other than our own with varying amounts of follow up. Patient 4's PSF was done in 1986 so radiographs were unavailable. In addition, the variable adherence to bracing make assessing bracing success difficult in this small cohort of patients. However, the four surgical cases help us to understand the progression of spinal curvature and the success of surgical interventions in TS patients with severe scoliosis. Patient 5 contributes to the understanding of the progression of spinal curvatures after bracing in this particular patient population and reinforces the notion that bracing can stabilize curves. However, as demonstrated by patient 1 and 2, curves can sometimes continue to worsen whether from non-compliance or failure of therapy warranting subsequent PSF.
16 Conclusion
This study is one of the few that has examined the clinical history and post-treatment outcomes in patients with TS undergoing bracing or surgery for severe scoliosis. Also unique to this study was the reporting of adjuvant treatments such as growth hormone and estrogen, which may have affected the progression of spinal curvatures reported. Definitive stances cannot be made, however, considering the limited cohort. Further studies are warranted to determine the risk factors and optimal treatment modalities for scoliotic TS patients. This study reinforces prior published recommendations regarding curves at which fusion is recommended. This study also corroborates with prior studies performed by Bjerkreimet et al. which demonstrated that the vast majority of untreated scoliosis cases will progress into adulthood. Therefore, similar to the guidelines set forth by Bjerkreimet et al. we continue to suggest that all patients with severe scoliosis pursuing nonoperative management should continue to be monitored for the duration of their lives.9
Funding
No funding was received.
Human and animal rights and informed consent
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
Level of evidence
Level IV.
Funding/sponsorship
This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Informed consent
The requirement for informed consent was waived for this retrospective study.
Institutional ethical committee approval
The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago.
Authors contribution
Manasa Pagadala: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Software, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Roles/Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing.
Jeremy Marx: Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Software, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Roles/Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing.
Hogan Brecount: Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Software, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Roles/Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing.
John Carney: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Erik Gerlach: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Peter Swiatek: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, John Sarwark: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources.
Funding statement
This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
References
- Orthopaedic manifestations in turner syndrome. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2019;27(23):e1021-e1028.
- [Google Scholar]
- The etiology of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Am J Orthoped. 2002;31(7):387-395.
- [Google Scholar]
- Progression in untreated idiopathic scoliosis after end of growth. Acta Orthop Scand. 1982;53(6):897-900.
- [Google Scholar]
- Long-term safety of recombinant human growth hormone in turner syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2008;93(2):344-351.
- [Google Scholar]
- Aetiology of idiopathic scoliosis: current concepts. Pediatr Rehabil. 2003;6(3-4):137-170.
- [Google Scholar]
- Growth rates and the prevalence and progression of scoliosis in short-statured children on Australian growth hormone treatment programmes. Scoliosis. 2007;2:3.
- [Google Scholar]
- Scoliosis in patients treated with growth hormone. J Pediatr Orthop. 1997;17(6):708-711.
- [Google Scholar]

