Translate this page into:
Liposclerosing myxofibrous tumor: A series of 9 cases and review of the literature
⁎Corresponding author: Diego Pinheiro Aguiar. diegopaguiar@gmail.com
-
Received: ,
Accepted: ,
This article was originally published by Reed Elsevier India Pvt. Ltd. and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.
Abstract
Abstract
Liposclerosing myxofibrous primary bone tumor is a rare benign bone lesion that was characterized by complex mixture of various histological elements.
We have studied the radiological, clinical and pathological features of nine patients with this disorder. Pain and limping were the main symptoms.
Radiographic images typically showed a geographic lytic lesion with thick sclerotic margin, reflecting a pattern of slow growth. Histological sections revealed a polymorphic neoplasia characterized by predominant proliferation of stellate and fusiform cells aimed the myxoid matrix.
These features suggest that the lesion may represent a variant of fibrous dysplasia with a high risk of malignant transformation.
Keywords
Bone tumors
Liposclerosing myxofibrous tumor
Series of cases
1 Introduction
Liposclerosing myxofibrous primary tumor (LSMFT) is a benign lesion of the bone. First described by Sweet and Ragsdale in 1986, it is characterized by combination of several histological elements including lipoma, fibroxanthoma, myxoma, myxofibroma, fibrous tissue, cyst formation, fat necrosis, ischemic bone tissue, and rarely cartilaginous tissue.1,2 Despite its typical characteristics, it is considered an extremely rare tumor.3 It has been shown that the LSMFT should not be considered as an isolated entity, but rather a variation of other tumors, such as fibrous dysplasia, intraosseous lipoma, healed solitary bone cysts and fibromyxoma osseous.4 Genetic analysis suggested that the lesion may represent a variant of fibrous dysplasia.5 The risk of transformation to malignant fibrous histiocytoma or osteosarcoma was estimated between 10% and 16%. The exact term for malignant transformation is not known but occurs over a long time with slow progression of the lesion.4,6 The purpose of this study is to show series of LSMFT treated in a referential oncologic hospital in Rio de Janeiro/Brazil and compare our observations with other studies.
2 Methods
A total of 9 reported cases of LSMFT were treated. The data collected consisted of clinical records, operative notes, radiographic images, microscopic imaging, as well as pathological reports.
2.1 Consent
Written informed consent was obtained from each patient in order to allow the publication of these series of case and accompanying images. A copy of the written consent document is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal. The Brazilian ethics committee permission for research – CAAE: 39771214.0.0000.5273
3 Results
Nine patients with LSMFT were evaluated and treated. The objects of study were composed by two men (22.2%) and seven women (77.8%); mean age was 39 years (19–53), with five black patients (55.5%) and four white patients (44.4%). The time between the onset of symptoms and the histopathological diagnosis varied between six and sixty months (mean 27 months) (Table 1). Pain and limping were the first symptoms. Other clinical and radiological data reported were history of trauma (two patients – 22.2%), pathological fracture (three patients – 33.3%) and local edema (two patients – 22.2%). The femur was the most affected bone (77.7%), with six cases (66.6%) in the proximal metaphysis and one (11.1%) case in the distal metaphysis. One case (11.1%) of LSMFT was observed in distal tibia and the other (11.1%) in the iliac (Table 1).
| Case | Sex | Age (Year) | Ethnicity | Location | Size (Method) | Image (RX) | Symptoms/diagnosis (Months) | Follow-up (Months) | Treatment |
| 1 | F | 50 | White | Right neck and femoral head | 3cm×3cm (MRI) | Lytic lesion, well-defined, eccentric and sclerosis edge | 6 | 14 | Curettage and grafting |
| 2 | M | 53 | Brown | Right distal tibia | 6cm×6cm (CT) | Lytic lesion with bone formation, eccentric, blowing, sclerosis edge and disruption of cortical | 36 | 97 | Transtibial amputation |
| 3 | M | 19 | Brown | Right distal femur | 8.5cm×8cm (CT) | Lytic lesion, eccentric, blowing, and sclerosis edge | 36 | 76 | Curettage and grafting |
| 4 | F | 45 | Brown | Right intertrochanteric region and femoral neck | 4cm×3cm (CT) | Central lesion, sclerotic and well-defined | 12 | 66 | Curettage and grafting |
| 5 | F | 42 | Brown | Left intertrochanteric region | 3cm×3cm (CT) | Lytic lesion, well-defined, eccentric and sclerosis edge | 60 | 66 | Curettage and grafting |
| 6 | F | 50 | White | Left iliac and acetabulum | 6cm×7cm (CT) | Lytic lesion and multiple injuries and sclerosis edge | 12 | 40 | No treatment |
| 7 | F | 39 | White | Right intertrochanteric region and femoral neck | 7cm×4cm (CT) | Eccentric mixed lesion and sclerosis edge | 48 | 29 | Curettage and grafting |
| 8 | F | 30 | Brown | Right intertrochanteric region | 5cm×6cm (CT) | Lytic lesion, well-defined, eccentric and sclerosis edge | 24 | 28 | Curettage and cementation |
| 9 | F | 27 | Brown | Left neck, femoral head and intertrochanteric region | 10cm×8cm (CT) | Eccentric mixed lesion and sclerosis edge | 12 | 14 | Curettage and grafting |
In general, radiographs typically showed a well-defined geographic lytic lesion with thick sclerotic margin, reflecting a pattern of slow growth. The bone contours were normal or showed expansion of cortical, but did not break it. Accelerated growth and cortical break were indicative of malignancy. The computed tomography (CT) images showed lytic lesions with sclerotic edge. Moreover, sclerotic and circinate patterning into tumor was observed. However, intralesional calcifications and break cortical were not found. The signal identified in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was high in T2-weighted and low in T1-weighted, with well-defined margins. The contrast injection usually shows a low or moderate intensity, as occurs in patients with fibrous dysplasia (Fig. 1). These characteristics can be explained probably due to the small amount of fat tissue and the abundance of myxofibrous and osteofibrous tissue.2

The surgical treatment was curettage with graft or cementation (intralesional margin). Six patients underwent allograft bone from tissue bank and one case was used bone cement in order to fill the tumor cavity. The case of malignancy was treated with transtibial amputation. After the diagnosis, one patient refused surgical treatment. This patient is being followed up in outpatient routine undergoing exams after 30 months of follow-up showed no evidence of malignancy, growth or metastasis.
The mean follow-up from histopathological diagnosis was 47 months (6–88 months). There were no complications related to surgery, recurrence, metastasis or death. No patient required chemotherapy or radiotherapy. One patient presented pain and deformity in the distal tibia. The biopsy was performed after 36 months of symptoms. Histopathological analysis showed several cellular aspects of malignancy. Thus, the patient underwent transtibial amputation, and after 88 months of follow-up, the recurrence or metastases were not observed (Fig. 2).

Histological sections revealed a polymorphic neoplasm characterized by predominant proliferation of stellate, fusiform, bipolar and oval cells arranged singly or in strings, which resulted in the myxoid matrix where there were also fat cells and histiocytes. It is also characterized by the formation of cystic cavities and septa. Bone foci of necrosis with fibrosis and amorphous calcifications were observed (Fig. 3).

The tissue from the patient with malignancy showed adipose tissue fragments with myxoid areas and proliferation of fusiform cells arranged in fibrous matrix and metaplastic bone formation and thick trabecular of poorly structured bone, with increased cellularity and atypical nuclei (Fig. 4).

4 Discussion
The LSMFT is a benign lesion of the bone which is characterized by complex combination of several histological elements including lipoma, fibroxanthoma, myxoma, myxofibroma, fibrous tissue, cyst formation, fat necrosis, ischemic bone tissue, and rarely cartilaginous tissue. Despite its histological complexity, the radiological features and skeletal distribution are typical.1 LSMFT affects men and women equally in the fourth decade of life, with no ethnical predilection. Although this series had a predominance of females (77.7%), the age range was consistent with other studies.1 The lesions are usually discovered for reasons unrelated to injury (41% of cases). Pain and pathologic fractures are the most common symptoms seen in 48% and 10% of cases, respectively.1–3,7 As noted in this study, three patients (33.3%) had pathological fracture.
LSMFT has important predilection for the femur (85% of lesions), with 90% in the intertrochanteric region. Our results showed that seven patients (77.7%) had tumor in the femur, where six of them (85.7%) were in the proximal femur. The other sites are ilium, humerus and tibia. Radiographs show a well-defined lytic lesion, often with thick sclerotic margins, and sometimes with calcification into the inner part, reflecting slow growth pattern. The bone contour is normal or shows the expandable design in 30% of cases.1,2,4
The matrix mineralization is common, and present in 72% of radiographs. A bone scan shows increased activity, but the uptake is usually mild to moderate, not as intense as typically seen in fibrous dysplasia. The presence of myxoid tissue explains the low attenuation in CT and hyperintense signal in MRI T2-weighted images. In addition, CT and MRI showed a well-defined lesion with marginal sclerosis and globular and irregular mineralized matrix.1,2
Intraosseous lipoma is easily differentiated because the MR and CT offer the possibility of documenting intralesional adipose tissue. CT demonstrates low attenuation of fat. In MRI, the adipose tissue of intraosseous lipoma shows image similar to subcutaneous fat in T1 (hyperintense) and T2 (hyposignal).1
Fibrous dysplasia reveals less sclerosis and increased activity in bone scintigraphy. The intensity signal of fibrous dysplasia in MRI varies. The standard of signal is low or moderate in fibrous dysplasia using T2-weighted images; however, the same signal is not often seen in LSMFT.1,2
Pathological fracture of the proximal femur may require arthroplasty. These tumors have a high risk of malignant transformation, compared with fibrous dysplasia.1,2,4 Malignant transformation occurs because of malignant fibrous histiocytoma or osteosarcoma, and it was estimated to occur between 10% and 16% of cases. In this study, one patient (11.1%) had malignant tumor for low-grade osteosarcoma. The exact term for malignant transformation is not known but occurs over a prolonged period of time due to the slow progression of the lesion. Cortical destruction and soft-tissue extension are aggressive characteristics that may indicate malignancy.5 The tumors with these characteristics should be always diagnosed by percutaneous biopsy and histopathology analyses and treated by curettage and bone grafting. After histological diagnosis, the patient can choose the surgical or non-surgical treatment. In non-surgical treatment, the patient should be evaluated every three months in the first two years and the third year in each six months by magnetic resonance and computed tomography alternately.
Average follow-up for the patients with LSMFT was 39 months (range of 6–88 months). No patient in this study passed away during the follow-up period, and no patients had metastasis or recurrence. In conclusion, the LSMFT is a benign lesion of the bone that was characterized by complex combination of several histological elements. Most lesions were incidentally discovered in femur. Radiographs show a well-defined lytic lesion, often with thick sclerotic margins. Cortical destruction and soft-tissue extension are aggressive characteristics that may indicate malignancy. These characteristics suggest that the lesion may represent a variant of fibrous dysplasia, with a high risk of malignant transformation.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare to have no commercial interests (e.g. consultancies, equity interest, stock ownership, or patent/licensing arrangements). The authors also declare to have no conflict of interest in this article.
References
- From the archives of the AFIP: benign musculoskeletal lipomatous lesions. Radiographics. 2004;24(5):1433-1466.
- [Google Scholar]
- [Diagnostic imaging of liposclerosing myxofibrous tumor of bone] Radiologia. 2009;52(3):251-254.
- [Google Scholar]
- Liposclerosing myxofibrous tumor (LSMFT), a study of 33 patients: should it be a distinct entity? Iowa Orthop J. 2012;32:35-39.
- [Google Scholar]
- Liposclerosing myxofibrous tumor: a radiologic-pathologic-distinct fibro-osseous lesion of bone with a marked predilection for the intertrochanteric region of the femur. Radiology. 1999;212(3):693-698.
- [Google Scholar]
- Polymorphic fibro-osseous lesions of bone: an almost site-specific diagnostic problem of the proximal femur. Hum Pathol. 1993;24(5):505-512.
- [Google Scholar]
- Case report: two-step malignant transformation of a liposclerosing myxofibrous tumor of bone. Clin Orthop. 2008;466(11):2873-2877.
- [Google Scholar]
- Clinical vignette: monostotic fibrous dysplasia of the proximal femur and liposclerosing myxofibrous tumor: which one is which? J Bone Miner Res. 2006;21(12):1955-1958.
- [Google Scholar]
