Translate this page into:
Impact of postoperative complications on patient-reported outcomes following surgical fixation of acetabular fractures
⁎Corresponding author: Joey P. Johnson. josephpjohnson@uabmc.edu
-
Received: ,
Accepted: ,
This article was originally published by Reed Elsevier India Pvt. Ltd. and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.
Abstract
Abstract
Acetabular fractures frequently require surgical fixation and carry high rates of complications. The impact of these complications on patient-reported recovery remains unclear. This study evaluated whether complications are associated with worse outcomes at 6 months postoperatively.
We retrospectively reviewed adults with AO/OTA 62 acetabular fractures treated operatively at a single Level I trauma center from June 2022 to October 2024. Patients who completed 6-month surveys were included. Outcomes were 6-month scores for PROMIS Physical Function (PF), Pain Interference (PI), Global Physical Health (GPH), Global Mental Health (GMH), Anxiety/Depression, Brief Resilience Scale (BRS), and percent of normal function. Patients were grouped by complication status, defined as fracture-related infection, venous thromboembolism, Brooker III-IV heterotopic ossification, or conversion to total hip arthroplasty. Scores were compared using t-tests for continuous variables and chi-square/Fisher exact tests for categorical variables, with significance set at p ≤ 0.05.
A total of 109 patients (mean age 50.6 years; 64.2 % male) were included; 22 (20.2 %) experienced at least one postoperative complication, most commonly conversion to total hip arthroplasty (THA) (11.9 %). At six months, patients with complications reported worse PROMIS scores than those without: PF 31.9 vs 40.2 (p = 0.002), PI 65.1 vs 59.2 (p = 0.016), GPH 35.2 vs. 42.8 (p = 0.002), and GMH 39.5 vs 45.8 (p = 0.021). Patients with fracture-related infection exhibited lower PF (28.8 vs 39.3, p = 0.021). Those converted to total hip arthroplasty demonstrated lower PF (31.4 vs 39.5, p = 0.020) and GPH (34.4 vs 42.3, p = 0.007). At one year (n = 81), scores remained lower in the complication cohort, but differences were not statistically significant.
Postoperative complications after acetabular fracture fixation are associated with clinically meaningful and statistically significant worse patient-reported physical function and global health, and higher pain interference at six months.
Keywords
Acetabular fractures
Patient-reported outcomes
PROMIS
Postoperative complications
1 Introduction
Acetabular fractures are complex injuries that often result from high-energy trauma, such as motor vehicle collisions (MVC) or falls from height.1,2 In older adults, however, low-energy mechanisms like ground-level falls can result in significant injury due to decreased bone quality.1–3 These injuries occur at an estimated incidence of 3 per 100,000 individuals annually.4 Surgical fixation is frequently required to restore anatomic alignment and preserve function, but the procedure carries a risk of complications.5 Infection and unplanned reoperation, including conversion to total hip arthroplasty (THA), are among the most common adverse events and may impact recovery and long-term outcomes.6–12
The long-term impact of postoperative complications on patient-reported outcomes remains poorly defined in orthopaedic trauma. Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) scores are a validated way to assess recovery from the patient's perspective, including measures such as physical function, pain interferences, and mental health.13,14 Although PROMIS measures have been widely applied in orthopaedics, limited data exists on their application in trauma patients, particularly those with pelvic and/or acetabular injuries.15–20
This study aims to determine whether complications following surgical fixation of acetabular fractures are associated with worse PROMIS outcomes at six months postoperatively. We hypothesized that patients who experience postoperative complications will report significantly worse patient-reported outcomes compared to those without complications.
2 Methods
2.1 Study design, setting, and participants
Following institutional review board approval, a retrospective review was conducted to identify patients who sustained an acetabulum fracture (AO/OTA 62) at a single Level I trauma center from June 2022–October 2024. Patients were identified using Current Procedural Terminology codes 27226–27228.
Eligible patients sustained AO/OTA 62 acetabular fractures, were managed surgically, and completed patient-reported outcome surveys 6 months postoperatively. Patients were excluded if they were treated nonoperatively, lacked adequate documentation in the electronic medical record (EMR), or failed to complete patient-reported outcome surveys at the six-month timepoint.
PROMIS is a standardized question bank developed by the National Institute of Health to measure patient-reported outcomes (PROs), including physical, mental, and social health across many medical conditions and disease states, including disease and pathology of the musculoskeletal system.13 PROMIS scores are reported on a T-score metric standardized to the U.S. general population (mean = 50, SD = 10). For physical function (PF), global physical health (GPH), and global mental health (GMH), higher scores indicate better health, whereas for pain interference (PI), anxiety, and depression, higher scores indicate worse symptoms.13,19
The Brief Resilience Scale (BRS) is a validated six-item questionnaire scored on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree to 5 = strongly agree) designed to assess an individual's ability to recover from stress, and percent of normal function is a single-item global assessment in which patients estimate their current level of function as a percentage of their pre-injury status (scaled 0–100 %).21,22 PROMIS, percent of normal function, and BRS surveys were administered electronically and sent directly to patients. All surveys utilized in this study are available in the Supplemental Digital Content.
Demographic and clinical variables, including age, sex, body mass index (BMI), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification, and comorbidities (e.g., diabetes, hypertension, tobacco, alcohol, and drug use) were recorded from the EMR. Operative characteristics recorded were surgical approach, operative duration, estimated blood loss (EBL), intraoperative use of tranexamic acid, bone grafting, staged fixation, quality of reduction, and receipt of intraoperative blood transfusion. Quality of reduction was assessed using Matta's radiographic criteria, with reductions categorized as anatomic (0–1 mm displacement), imperfect (2–3 mm), or poor (>3 mm).23
Fracture characteristics were noted, including laterality, mechanism of injury (e.g., motor vehicle collision, fall from height, ground-level fall), associated hip dislocation, polytrauma status, and concomitant ipsilateral lower extremity injury. Polytrauma was defined as an injury severity score of >16.24,25 Fracture types were categorized using the Letournel/Judet system as simple or complex patterns.26
The primary outcomes were six-month patient-reported outcome scores for PF, PI, GMH, GPH, anxiety, depression, BRS and percent of normal function. Six months was selected as the primary survey timepoint because it yielded the highest response rate and offered a practical reflection of early functional recovery. Follow-up beyond six months was limited due to well-documented frequent loss to follow-up among orthopaedic trauma patients.27
Patients were stratified by complication status using a composite “any complication” category, comprising fracture-related infection (FRI), venous thromboembolism (VTE: deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism), heterotopic ossification (HO; Brooker III-IV), and conversion to THA. HO was considered a complication only when classified as Brooker stage III or IV, given its association with functional limitations.28–30 FRI was identified using the 2018 consensus definition.31
PROMIS, percent of normal, and BRS scores collected at one-year follow-up were also analyzed as a secondary outcome to assess longer-term trends in recovery, with a follow-up cohort of 81 patients.
2.1.1 Statistical analyses
Descriptive statistics were generated to characterize the study population. Categorical variables are presented as numbers and percentages and were compared using chi-square or Fisher's exact test, as appropriate. Continuous variables are reported as means with standard deviations and were compared using independent t-tests. The threshold for statistical significance was defined as a two-sided p-value of ≤0.05. All statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS (Version 29.0.2.0).
3 Results
Of 456 patients who underwent operative fixation of acetabular fractures during the study period, 109 patients completed postoperative surveys and were included in the analysis. Baseline patient demographics and comorbidities are presented in Table 1. The mean age of this cohort was 50.6 years (range: 16–91 years), and 64.2 % were male (Table 1). The mean follow-up duration was 218.7 days (range, 180–1106 days). The majority of patients identified as White (60.6 %), followed by Black (36.7 %). The average BMI was 30.3 kg/m2 (range: 18.3–58.1 kg/m2) (Table 1). Hypertension was documented in 34.9 % of patients and diabetes in 11.0 %. Tobacco use was reported by 29.4 % of patients, and 27.5 % reported alcohol use. Most patients were classified as ASA III (65.1 %) (Table 1). When stratified by complication status, there were no statistically significant differences in baseline characteristics or comorbidities (Table 1).
| Variable | Total cohort (n = 109) | Complications (n = 22) | No complications (n = 87) | p-value |
| Follow-up (days), mean (SD) | 218.7 (181.4) | 224.6 (163.6) | 217.2 (186.6) | 0.864 |
| Age, mean (SD) | 50.6 (19.1) | 52.6 (17.6) | 50.1 (19.5) | 0.583 |
| Sex, n (%) | 0.664 | |||
| Male | 70 (64.2) | 15 (68.2) | 55 (63.2) | |
| Female | 39 (35.8) | 7 (31.8) | 32 (36.8) | |
| Race, n (%) | 0.548 | |||
| White | 66 (60.6) | 15 (68.2) | 51 (58.6) | |
| Black | 40 (36.7) | 7 (31.8) | 33 (37.9) | |
| Other | 3 (2.8) | 0 (0.0) | 3 (3.4) | |
| BMI (kg/m2), mean (SD) | 30.3 (8.2) | 31.7 (8.1) | 29.9 (8.2) | 0.374 |
| Diabetes, n (%) | 12 (11.0) | 3 (13.6) | 9 (10.3) | 0.452 |
| Hypertension, n (%) | 38 (34.9) | 10 (45.5) | 28 (32.2) | 0.243 |
| Tobacco use, n (%) | 32 (29.4) | 7 (31.8) | 25 (28.7) | 0.777 |
| Alcohol use, n (%) | 30 (27.5) | 8 (36.4) | 22 (25.3) | 0.299 |
| Drug use, n (%) | 16 (14.7) | 4 (18.2) | 12 (13.8) | 0.409 |
| CKD, n (%) | 2 (1.8) | 1 (4.5) | 1 (1.1) | 0.364 |
| COPD, n (%) | 5 (4.6) | 1 (4.5) | 4 (4.6) | 0.735 |
| CAD, n (%) | 9 (8.3) | 1 (4.5) | 8 (9.2) | 0.422 |
| ASA score, n (%) | 0.263 | |||
| I | 2 (1.8) | 1 (4.5) | 1 (1.1) | |
| II | 29 (26.6) | 2 (9.1) | 26 (29.9) | |
| III | 71 (65.1) | 17 (77.3) | 55 (63.2) | |
| IV | 7 (6.4) | 2 (9.1) | 5 (5.7) |
Injury characteristics are summarized in Table 2. High-energy trauma was the predominant mechanism of injury, with motor vehicle collisions accounting for 60.6 % of cases. Polytrauma was present in 34.9 % of patients, and 45.0 % had associated hip dislocations. The most frequently encountered fracture patterns were transverse plus posterior wall (25.7 %), posterior wall (24.8 %), and anterior column/posterior hemitransverse (17.4 %) (Table 2). Overall, 61.6 % of fractures were classified as complex patterns. When stratified by complication status, patients who developed postoperative complications were significantly more likely to present with an associated dislocation compared to those without complications (63.6 % vs. 40.2 %, p = 0.049) (Table 2).
| Variable | Total cohort (n = 109) | Complications (n = 22) | No complications (n = 87) | p-value |
| Laterality, n (%) | 0.005 | |||
| Right | 60 (55.0) | 18 (81.8) | 42 (48.3) | |
| Left | 49 (45.0) | 4 (18.2) | 45 (51.7) | |
| Associated dislocation, n (%) | 49 (45.0) | 14 (63.6) | 35 (40.2) | 0.049 |
| Polytrauma, n (%) | 38 (34.9) | 10 (45.5) | 49 (56.3) | 0.361 |
| Ipsilateral LE injury, n (%) | 27 (24.8) | 7 (31.8) | 20 (23.3) | 0.408 |
| Mechanism of injury, n (%) | 0.670 | |||
| MVC | 66 (60.6) | 14 (63.6) | 52 (59.8) | |
| MCC | 3 (2.8) | 0 (0) | 3 (3.4) | |
| FFH | 11 (10.1) | 3 (13.6) | 8 (9.2) | |
| GLF | 18 (16.5) | 2 (9.1) | 16 (18.4) | |
| Peds vs. auto | 2 (1.8) | 1 (4.5) | 1 (1.1) | |
| Other | 9 (8.3) | 2 (9.1) | 7 (8.0) | |
| Judet classification, n (%) | 0.973 | |||
| PW | 27 (24.8) | 6 (27.3) | 21 (24.1) | |
| PC | 1 (0.9) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (1.1) | |
| AC | 3 (2.8) | 0 (0.0) | 3 (3.4) | |
| Transverse | 8 (7.3) | 2 (9.1) | 6 (6.9) | |
| T-shaped | 6 (5.5) | 2 (9.1) | 4 (4.6) | |
| PC + PW | 7 (6.4) | 1 (4.5) | 6 (6.9) | |
| Tr + PW | 28 (25.7) | 6 (27.3) | 22 (25.3) | |
| AC/W + PH | 19 (17.4) | 3 (13.6) | 16 (18.4) | |
| Both column | 10 (9.2) | 2 (9.1) | 8 (9.2) |
Surgical characteristics are shown in Table 3. The Kocher-Langenbeck approach was used most commonly (55.9 %) (Table 3). Staged fixation was performed in 9.2 % of cases. The mean operative time was 145.7 min (range: 19–981 min), and the average estimated blood loss was 443.6 mL (Table 3). Intraoperative blood transfusion was required in 18.3 % of patients, and tranexamic acid was administered in 44.0 % of cases (Table 3). When stratified by postoperative complication status, there were no statistically significant differences in surgical characteristics between the two groups (Table 3).
| Variable | Total cohort (n = 109) | Complications (n = 22) | No complications (n = 87) | p-value |
| Traction pin, n (%) | 59 (54.1) | 12 (54.5) | 47 (54.7) | 0.993 |
| Closed reduction, n (%) | 28 (25.7) | 7 (31.8) | 21 (24.4) | 0.480 |
| Surgical approach, n (%) | 0.938 | |||
| Kocher-Langenbeck | 61 (55.9) | 13 (59.1) | 48 (55.8) | |
| Lateral-window | 16 (14.7) | 2 (9.1) | 14 (16.3) | |
| Stoppa intrapelvic | 3 (2.8) | 1 (4.5) | 2 (2.3) | |
| Pfannenstiel | 16 (14.7) | 4 (18.2) | 12 (14.0) | |
| Standard posterior | 6 (5.5) | 1 (4.5) | 5 (5.8) | |
| Other | 7 (6.4) | 1 (4.5) | 6 (6.9) | |
| Staged ORIF, n (%) | 10 (9.2) | 4 (18.2) | 6 (6.9) | 0.114 |
| IO blood transfusion, n (%) | 20 (18.3) | 3 (14.3) | 17 (19.5) | 0.420 |
| IO TXA, n (%) | 48 (44.0) | 10 (45.5) | 38 (43.7) | 0.881 |
| Bone graft, n (%) | 5 (4.6) | 2 (9.1) | 3 (3.4) | 0.265 |
| OR time (min), mean (SD) | 145.7 (106.9) | 180.2 (193.5) | 136.9 (69.4) | 0.312 |
| EBL (mL), mean (SD) | 443.6 (377.6) | 488.4 (366.7) | 431.9 (381.7) | 0.535 |
| Quality of reduction, n (%) | 0.464 | |||
| Anatomic | 67 (61.5) | 16 (72.7) | 51 (58.6) | |
| Imperfect | 30 (27.5) | 4 (18.2) | 26 (29.9) | |
| Poor | 12 (11.0) | 2 (9.1) | 10 (11.5) |
Postoperative complications are detailed in Table 4. Over the course of follow-up, 22 patients (20.2 %) experienced at least one complication. The most common was conversion to THA, which occurred in 13 patients (11.9 %) (Table 4). The average time to THA was 256.2 days (range: 95–595 days). Six patients (5.5 %) developed FRI, four patients (3.7 %) developed heterotopic ossification (Brooker III-IV), and two patients (1.8 %) experienced venous thromboembolism (Table 4).
| Variable | n (%) |
| Any complication | 22 (20.2) |
| Fracture-related infection | 6 (5.5) |
| Deep vein thrombosis/pulmonary embolism | 2 (1.8) |
| Heterotopic ossification | 4 (3.7) |
| Conversion to THA | 13 (11.9) |
When stratified by postoperative complication status (Table 5), patients who experienced any complication reported significantly worse patient-reported outcome scores at 6 months compared to those without complications, including lower PF (31.9 vs 40.2, p = 0.002), GPH (35.2 vs 42.8, p = 0.002), and GMH (39.5 vs. 45.8, p = 0.021). They also reported higher PI (65.1 vs 59.2, p = 0.016) (Table 5).
| Variable | Complication, mean (SD) | No complication, mean (SD) | p-value |
| Physical function | 31.9 (7.9) | 40.2 (9.8) | 0.002 |
| Pain interference | 65.1 (6.7) | 59.2 (8.9) | 0.016 |
| GPH | 35.2 (7.7) | 42.8 (9.6) | 0.002 |
| GMH | 39.5 (8.8) | 45.8 (11.2) | 0.021 |
| Depression | 58.0 (11.9) | 53.0 (11.9) | 0.125 |
| Anxiety | 57.8 (10.4) | 53.4 (12.4) | 0.184 |
| Percent of normal | 55.2 (22.0) | 60.7 (25.9) | 0.422 |
| BRS | 3.2 (0.6) | 3.6 (0.9) | 0.141 |
When stratified by FRI status (Table 6), patients with postoperative FRI had significantly worse PF scores compared to those without FRI (28.8 vs 39.2, p = 0.021). Differences in other PROMIS measures, percent of normal, and BRS scores did not reach statistical significance (Table 6).
| Variable | FRI, mean (SD) | No FRI, mean (SD) | p-value |
| Physical function | 28.8 (7.6) | 39.3 (9.8) | 0.021 |
| Pain interference | 65.8 (7.7) | 59.8 (8.8) | 0.141 |
| GPH | 36.1 (7.5) | 41.7 (9.8) | 0.212 |
| GMH | 40.6 (10.2) | 44.8 (11.1) | 0.411 |
| Depression | 58.4 (14.5) | 53.7 (11.8) | 0.354 |
| Anxiety | 54.8 (13.7) | 54.3 (12.1) | 0.924 |
| Percent of normal | 59.3 (18.6) | 59.6 (25.7) | 0.980 |
| BRS | 3.2 (0.6) | 3.5 (0.9) | 0.376 |
Patients who required conversion to THA (Table 7) demonstrated significantly lower PROMIS PF (31.4 vs 39.5, p = 0.020) and GPH (34.4 vs 42.3, p = 0.007) compared to patients who did not require THA (Table 7). Differences in other measures were not statistically significant (Table 7).
| Variable | Conversion to THA, mean (SD) | No conversion, mean (SD) | p-value |
| Physical function | 31.4 (6.8) | 39.5 (10.0) | 0.020 |
| Pain interference | 65.4 (5.8) | 59.7 (8.9) | 0.081 |
| GPH | 34.4 (6.8) | 42.3 (9.7) | 0.007 |
| GMH | 41.1 (9.2) | 45.0 (11.2) | 0.245 |
| Depression | 54.4 (9.7) | 54.0 (12.3) | 0.923 |
| Anxiety | 54.7 (8.6) | 54.3 (12.5) | 0.922 |
| Percent of normal | 50.9 (27.1) | 60.6 (24.9) | 0.275 |
| BRS | 3.3 (0.6) | 3.5 (0.9) | 0.564 |
One-year patient-reported outcomes are shown in Table 8. At one year, patients with complications continued to report lower patient-reported outcome scores across all domains; however, none of these differences reached statistical significance (Table 8).
| Variable | Complication, mean (SD) | No complication, mean (SD) | p-value |
| Physical function | 37.2 (6.7) | 41.3 (9.4) | 0.136 |
| Pain interference | 63.2 (5.7) | 59.2 (9.6) | 0.063 |
| GPH | 40.0 (9.6) | 43.7 (10.5) | 0.224 |
| GMH | 41.4 (9.5) | 46.3 (10.3) | 0.101 |
| Depression | 58.8 (11.3) | 51.9 (11.8) | 0.070 |
| Anxiety | 59.1 (9.5) | 53.9 (11.5) | 0.154 |
| Percent of normal | 56.3 (27.4) | 65.2 (27.2) | 0.315 |
| BRS | 3.6 (0.9) | 3.7 (0.8) | 0.711 |
4 Discussion
In this retrospective cohort study, postoperative complications following surgical fixation of acetabular fractures were associated with significantly lower patient-reported outcomes at 6 months, as measured by PROMIS, BRS, and percent of normal function. Patients with postoperative complications reported lower PROMIS PF, GPH, and GMH scores, along with greater pain interference. Notably, both postoperative FRI and conversion to THA were associated with significantly reduced physical function, while conversion to THA was also associated with lower global physical health at the 6-month time point. These differences, while still present at one year, did not reach statistical significance, suggesting that early complications may have a more pronounced effect on short-term outcomes.
These findings were consistent with prior studies demonstrating that postoperative complications, such as infection and reoperation, can negatively impact functional outcomes after pelvic and acetabular surgery.12,32 In contrast to other studies that primarily focused on radiographic or clinical measures, the current study utilized PROMIS, a validated, patient-centered metric that captures both physical and mental health outcomes. This is particularly relevant in orthopaedic trauma populations, where recovery can vary widely and may not be fully reflected by imaging or objective tests alone.33
In this cohort, there was an 11.9 % rate of conversion to THA, a rate that is consistent with current literature (5.7–17.8 %).2,6,12,32,34–36 Patients who required conversion to THA demonstrated significantly lower PF and GPH scores compared to those who did not. It is important to note that, although this conversion rate aligns with reported literature, patient-reported outcomes were assessed only at 6 months, which may not fully capture the long-term impact of conversion to THA on patient-reported outcomes.
Patients who developed postoperative FRI in this cohort reported significantly lower physical function. This aligns with broader trends observed in orthopedic trauma, where FRI has been associated with poorer functional recovery and quality of life, and may contribute to lasting deficits and greater hospitalization burden.37,38 The observed rate of FRI (5.5 %) in the current study is slightly higher than, but overall comparable to, rates reported in the literature (3.5–5.0 %),39–41 underscoring the importance of ongoing efforts in prevention, early recognition, and management of this complication.
While differences in patient-reported outcomes were significant at 6 months, these differences were no longer statistically significant at 1 year. This may suggest a degree of functional recovery over time, or it may reflect a smaller sample of patients with 1-year data, limiting the ability to detect differences. Houwen et al. reported that PROMIS PF and PI were most impaired shortly after fracture, but continued to improve over the first year in both upper and lower extremity injuries, suggesting a broader trend of early deficits and gradual recovery over time.42
While several patient-reported outcome domains demonstrated statistically significant differences between patients with and without complications, it is also important to consider whether these differences meet the threshold for minimal clinically importance difference (MCID), which varies widely depending on calculation method and patient population. Thorne et al. established MCID thresholds for patients with acetabular and pelvic fractures, reporting distribution-based and anchor-based MCIDs for PROMIS physical function (5.19–7.18), pain interference (3.97–8.03), anxiety (4.33–5.85), and depression (4.41–5.00) scores.14 In this cohort, differences in PF (8.3 points), GPH (7.6 points), and GMH (6.3 points) exceeded these thresholds, suggesting that the observed differences in scores are both statistically and clinically significant. Although some differences, such as PI and BRS, did not consistently exceed MCID thresholds, the trends support the overall conclusion that early postoperative complications may lead to meaningful decrements in recovery at the six-month time point.
This study provided insight into the impact of early complications on patient-perceived recovery at six months following acetabular fracture fixation. By using PROMIS, differences across multiple domains of patients' perceived health were captured that might not have been identified with traditional outcome measures.
4.1 Limitations
This study has limitations that should be considered when interpreting these findings, including those inherent to its retrospective design. Conducted at a single institution, the results may not be generalizable to other settings with different patient populations, clinical protocols, or acetabular fracture management practices. The use of 6-month patient-reported outcome scores may limit the ability to capture the longer-term consequences of complications, particularly conversion to THA, which may occur years after the index procedure. As such, the effect of this complication on patient-reported outcomes beyond the early postoperative period remains unclear. Differences between survey responders and non-responders were not assessed, and this may have influenced the findings if systematic differences existed between groups. Furthermore, attrition in survey responses may have limited the ability to detect longer-term differences.
5 Conclusion
Postoperative complications, including FRI and conversion to THA, were associated with significantly lower patient-reported outcomes at six months following acetabular fracture fixation. These findings were still present at the one-year timepoint, though were not statistically significant. Overall, PROMIS represents a viable option for tracking recovery, guiding patient-centered care, and setting expectations for both clinicians and patients.
JOO ethical statement - ethical approval
This study was conducted in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and national research committees and with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments. Institutional Review Board approval was obtained from the University of Alabama at Birmingham (IRB # 300008798). Given the retrospective design of the study, informed consent was waived. All patient data were de-identified prior to analysis to ensure privacy and confidentiality.
Guardian/patient's consent
JOO Patient Consent.
This study was approved by the University of Alabama at Birmingham Institutional Review Board (IRB #300008798). The requirement for informed consent was waived due to the retrospective nature of the study and the use of de-identified data.
CRediT author statement
Mary Jane McConnell: Data curation, Formal analysis, Writing = Original draft preparation.
Robin M. Litten: Data curation, Formal analysis, Visualization, Writing = Review and Editing.
Humza S. Bhatti: Data curation, Writing = Review and Editing.
Ryan N. McIlwain: Data curation, Writing = Review and Editing.
Decorian D. North: Methodology, Supervision, Writing = Review and Editing.
Clay A. Spitler: Conceptualization, Methodology, Supervision, Writing = Review and Editing.
Joey P. Johnson: Conceptualization, Methodology, Supervision, Project administration, Writing = Review and Editing.
Funding
This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
References
- Hip dislocations and concurrent injuries in motor vehicle collisions. Injury. 2018;49(7):1297-1301.
- [Google Scholar]
- Surgical management of acetabular fractures - a contemporary literature review. Injury. 2020;51(10):2267-2277.
- [Google Scholar]
- Epidemiology of pelvic and acetabular fractures in France. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2020;106(5):831-839.
- [Google Scholar]
- Acetabular fractures: a 16-year prospective epidemiological study. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005;87(7):969-973.
- [Google Scholar]
- Open reduction and internal fixation of acetabular fractures in patients of old age. Int Orthop. 2020;44(10):2123-2130.
- [Google Scholar]
- Long-term total hip arthroplasty rates in patients with acetabular and pelvic fractures after surgery: A population-based cohort study. PLoS One. 2020;15(4)
- [Google Scholar]
- Fracture and patient characteristics associated with early conversion total hip arthroplasty after acetabular fracture fixation. J Orthop Trauma. 2021;35(11):599-605.
- [Google Scholar]
- Risk factors for conversion to total hip arthroplasty after acetabular fractures involving the posterior wall. J Orthop Trauma. 2018;32(12):607-611.
- [Google Scholar]
- Outcomes following operatively managed acetabular fractures in patients aged 60 years and older. Bone Joint J. 2020;102:1735-1742.
- [Google Scholar]
- Survivorship of the hip joint after acetabulum fracture. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2021;29(18):781-788.
- [Google Scholar]
- Risk factors for deep infection and conversion total hip arthroplasty after operative combined pelvic ring and acetabular fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2022;36(11):573-578.
- [Google Scholar]
- Evaluation of the trajectory of recovery following surgically treated acetabular fractures. Bone Joint J. 2024;106:69-76.
- [Google Scholar]
- PROMIS for orthopaedic outcomes measurement. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2016;24(11):744-749.
- [Google Scholar]
- The trajectory of patient-reported outcomes and minimal clinically important differences in isolated and polytraumatic pelvis and acetabular fractures. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2024;34(7):3465-3472.
- [Google Scholar]
- Use of patient-reported outcomes measurement information system measures in orthopaedic specialties: results of a scoping review for 2018 to 2022. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2025;33(11):561-568.
- [Google Scholar]
- Patient-reported outcome measurement in orthopaedic trauma. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2023;31(20):e906-e919.
- [Google Scholar]
- Patient-reported anxiety scores are associated with lower physical function in patients experiencing orthopaedic trauma. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2023;481(5):967-973.
- [Google Scholar]
- Is PROMIS the new standard for patient-reported outcomes measures in orthopaedic trauma research? Injury. 2020;51:S43-s50.
- [Google Scholar]
- Patient reported Outcomes measurement information System scores in orthopedic trauma surgery. Orthop Clin N Am. 2025;56(3):205-211.
- [Google Scholar]
- Resilience improves patient-reported outcomes after orthopaedic trauma. J Orthop Trauma. 2024;38(5):e163-e168.
- [Google Scholar]
- The brief resilience scale: assessing the ability to bounce back. Int J Behav Med. 2008;15(3):194-200.
- [Google Scholar]
- Percent of normal: a pragmatic patient-reported outcome measure for the orthopaedic trauma clinic. J Orthopaed Traum. 2021;35(11):e429-e432.
- [Google Scholar]
- Fractures of the acetabulum: accuracy of reduction and clinical results in patients managed operatively within three weeks after the injury. JBJS. 1996;78(11):1632-1645.
- [Google Scholar]
- Impact of helicopter transport and hospital level on mortality of polytrauma patients. J Trauma. 2004;56(1):94-98.
- [Google Scholar]
- Evaluating trauma care: the TRISS method. Trauma Score and the Injury Severity Score. J Trauma. 1987;27(4):370-378.
- [Google Scholar]
- Fractures of the acetabulum: classification and surgical approaches for open reduction: preliminary report. JBJS. 1964;46(8):1615-1675.
- [Google Scholar]
- Orthopaedic trauma patient non-adherence to follow-up visits at a level 1 trauma center serving an urban and rural population. Injury. 2023;54(3):880-886.
- [Google Scholar]
- Ectopic ossification following total hip replacement: incidence and a method of classification. Jbjs. 1973;55(8):1629-1632.
- [Google Scholar]
- Clinical significance of the heterotopic ossification after total hip arthroplasty. Orthopedics. 2010;33(1):16.
- [Google Scholar]
- The influence of heterotopic ossification on functional status of hip joint following total hip arthroplasty. Strahlenther Onkol. 2005;181(8):529-533.
- [Google Scholar]
- Fracture-related infection: A consensus on definition from an international expert group. Injury. 2018;49(3):505-510.
- [Google Scholar]
- Predictor variables in acetabular fractures surgically treated. Injury. 2021;52(Suppl 4):S27-s31.
- [Google Scholar]
- Evaluating time points for measuring recovery after major trauma in adults. Ann Surg. 2013;257(1):166-172.
- [Google Scholar]
- Risk factors for early reoperation after operative treatment of acetabular fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2018;32(7)
- [Google Scholar]
- Complications after surgical treatment of acetabular fractures: a 5-year follow-up of 229 patients. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2023;33(4):1245-1253.
- [Google Scholar]
- Predictors of postoperative outcome for acetabular fractures. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2013;99(8):929-935.
- [Google Scholar]
- Fracture-related infection after internal fixation of pelvic and acetabular fractures: a population-based analysis of risk factors and economic costs. The Bone & Joint Journal. 2025;107(8):839-845.
- [Google Scholar]
- Fracture related infections and their risk factors for treatment failure-a major trauma centre perspective. Diagnostics (Basel). 2022;12(5)
- [Google Scholar]
- Body mass index as a predictor of complications after operative treatment of acetabular fractures. JBJS. 2005;87(7):1498-1502.
- [Google Scholar]
- Displaced acetabular fractures managed operatively: indicators of outcome. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®. 2003;407:173-186.
- [Google Scholar]
- Postoperative surgical site infection following acetabular fracture fixation. Injury. 2010;41(4):396-399.
- [Google Scholar]
- Using PROM(I)S to measure health-related quality of life in patients with a bone fracture: An observational cohort study. Injury. 2024;55(3):111278.
- [Google Scholar]

