Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Case Report
Clinical research study
Current Issue
Editorial Board
Literature Review
Narrative review
Original Article
Research Article
Review Article
Short Report
Surgical techniques
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Case Report
Clinical research study
Current Issue
Editorial Board
Literature Review
Narrative review
Original Article
Research Article
Review Article
Short Report
Surgical techniques
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

37 (); 5-8
doi:
10.1016/j.jor.2023.01.009

Contemporary challenges in clubfoot treatment: A quantitative study among Indian parents

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Malaviya National Institute of Technology, Jaipur, India
Santokhba Durlabhji Memorial Hospital, Jaipur, India

∗Corresponding author: Harlal Singh Mali. harlal.singh@gmail.com

Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Reed Elsevier India Pvt. Ltd. and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

Abstract

Abstract

The studies conducted a decade ago showed that the Ponseti method, suffers from many execution-related issues-particularly in low and middle-income countries including poverty, physical distance, lack of transportation etc. The society has undergone many changes, including improvements in literacy, connectivity (both transport and digital), etc., in the last decade. Therefore, this study is designed to identify the contemporary apprehensions, concerns, and challenges of parents seeking CTEV treatment for their child through the Ponseti Method in India.

A descriptive cross-sectional study of 200 parents of the children undergoing treatment at a multi-specialty hospital is carried out using an interview guide. The semi-structured interviews were conducted telephonically and recorded.

The statistical analysis shows that a male child is presented late than a female child. The physical distance is associated with child discomfort during the casting and bracing phase, with the travel method affecting the follow-up. The increase in travel time may result in increased casts due to a lack of regular follow-up. Parents' income level is also strongly associated with regularity of follow-up and child discomfort during treatment.

The patients traveling long distances in public transport are the most vulnerable group regardless of gender. The children in such cases are more likely to experience discomfort during the casting and bracing phase with a lack of regular follow-up. Expert doctors and brace unavailability in the local area remain vital challenges for the parents.

Keywords

Child
CTEV
Clubfoot
Parents
India
1

1 Background

Clubfoot is a foot and ankle congenital deformity, with an incidence rate of 1–6.8 per 1000 births.1,2 The low and middle-income countries (LMICs) report 80% of the cases.3 The untreated Clubfoot severely impairs the gait and hence the patient's reduced participation in society resulting in physical, social, economic, and mental developmental challenges.

A minimally-invasive method named the Ponseti method is currently the gold standard of CTEV treatment. The Ponseti method has a more than 90% success rate4–6 and has been adopted worldwide as the primary technique of CTEV treatment. However, it suffers from various challenges in implementation, particularly in low-resource settings.7–12 Due to these challenges, the treatment is accessible to only 10–15% of parents in low and middle-income countries.13

India has a population of approximately 1.34 billion with a birth rate of 17.53 per 1000 population.14 With an approximate incidence rate of 1.2 per 1000 births, 30,000 infants are born with CTEV deformity annually in India. India has the second-highest population in the world, with a vast geographical area. Yet, there are limited insights into the different perspectives of parents in this middle-income country. A limited number of studies have explored parents' perceptions comprehensively of their child's health.

The focus of this study is to evaluate the parent's experience of their child's clubfoot treatment in India, helping develop solutions to improve treatment compliance and reduce complications.

2

2 Methods

2.1

2.1 Study design

A descriptive design study explored parents' opinions, apprehensions, and requirements about their child's CTEV treatment.

2.2

2.2 Sample

The participants were recruited from a PMR (Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation) department of a multi-specialty hospital in Jaipur, Rajasthan, specializing in CTEV treatment through the Ponseti Technique and receiving patients from very distant areas, even up to 1200 km. The inclusion criteria required a parent/caregiver with a child of 1.5–24 months in the bracing protocol for idiopathic clubfoot between October 2020 and October 2021. The exclusion criteria were the patients with syndromic clubfoot or relapse cases.

2.3

2.3 Data collection

The Institute Ethics Committee granted the ethical approval, and the participants were recruited. An interview guide was used to conduct semi-structured telephone interviews of the participants at convenient times. Highlighting the voluntary and confidential data policy for all participants', telephonic consent was obtained. Data were collected in October 2021 by the leading researcher. The lead researcher was not involved in the treatment. The parents from 4 neighboring states of Rajasthan were available.

Five pilot interviews were used to evaluate the guide and the process. The data of these five interviews were excluded from the final analysis. In total, 246 participants were available, of which 39 parents did not meet the participants' inclusion criteria. After obtaining consent from 207 participants, seven pilot interviews were conducted. Two hundred participants were interviewed with audio recording. The interviews lasted between 10 and 20 min. The recorded interviews were translated verbatim, and data was analyzed. The leading researcher simultaneously conducted all the interviews and translations to continuously reflect the evolving ideas during the study (Add Table 1 here).

Table 1 Baseline characteristics of participants (n = 200).
S.No. Characteristic Number (n) Percentage (%)
1 Gender (Infant)
Male 146 73
Female 54 27
2 Deformity
Bilateral 112 56
Right 57 28.5
Left 31 15.5
3 Residence
Urban 113 56.5
Semi-Urban 42 21
Rural 45 22.5
4 Monthly Income of Family
High (>INR 112000) 16 8.0
Upper Middle (45000–11200 INR) 113 56.5
Medium (22500–45000 INR) 47 23.5
Low (<22500 INR) 24 12.0
5 Literacy Level
Graduate or Higher 137 68.5
Secondary or Higher 46 23
Primary or Below 17 8.5
2.4

2.4 Data analysis

Data analysis was carried out using the software package IBM SPSS® Statistics for Windows, version 25 (IBM Corp., Armonk, N.Y., USA). Univariate analysis is used to find out the correlation between various parameters.

3

3 Results

Most of the children under treatment were male, and the bilateral deformity was dominant among the patients. The majority of participants were from an urban residence, as shown in Table 1. The sample has participants from varying economic backgrounds, including high, upper-middle, middle, and Low-income groups.15 The parents' primary concerns and associated issues from the thematic analysis are shown in Fig. 1.

Major barriers to CTEV treatment and their effects.
Fig. 1 Major barriers to CTEV treatment and their effects.
3.1

3.1 statistical analysis

The statistical analysis provides novel insights into CTEV management. The cases of neglected clubfoot were excluded from statistical analysis to avoid bias in the results. As shown in Table 2, various statistical tests are used to find the co-relation among treatment factors like the number of casts, follow-up, casting discomfort and bracing discomfort, etc. The child's discomfort was reported by parents as excessive crying during casting or bracing. The treatment start age significantly relates to gender (p=0.031). The comparison of means has shown that the mean age of presentation is 3.7 weeks, with female children (mean age: 2.3 weeks) being presented significantly earlier than male children (mean age: 4 weeks). However, gender has no other correlation with any other treatment factor. The type of deformity, i.e., unilateral or bilateral, also does not associate with treatment factors (Add Table 2 here).

Table 2 Univariate analysis of treatment parameters and factors.
S.No. Treatment Start Age Number of Casts Follow-up Casting Discomfort Bracing Discomfort
Gender 0.031 0.538 0.788 0.668 0.655
Deformity 0.850 0.096 0.713 0.281 0.571
Distance 0.134 0.066 0.843 0.045 0.021
Locality 0.763 0.672 0.712 0.059 0.130
Treatment Start Age 0.083 0.572 0.620 0.315
Number of Casts 0.125 0.085 0.037
Travel Mode 0.367 0.171 0.028 0.005 0.004
Travel Time 0.192 0.022 0.012 0.344 0.742
Literacy Level 0.280 0.132 0.344 0.037 0.088
Income 0.298 0.224 0.008 0.002 0.015

The casting (p=0.045) and bracing discomfort (p=0.021) significantly correlate with distance from the treatment center. The residence (locality) and treatment start age do not correlate with any treatment factor. However, the number of casts significantly correlates with bracing discomfort (p=0.037). The bracing discomfort was more common among the children with casts six or more. While the travel mode does not have any correlation with the start age of treatment, it is strongly associated with follow-up (p=0.028), child discomfort in casting (p=0.005) as well, and the bracing phase (p=0.004). The public transport causes more travel time for the same distance and booking has to be made well in advance. Apart from that, there are other issues in public transport like over-crowding, noise pollution, etc., which adds to the child's discomfort. Therefore, parents using public transport were more irregular in follow-ups and reported child discomfort more commonly than parents using a personal vehicle. The travel time to the hospital significantly affects the number of casts (p=0.022) and follow-up (p=0.012). With the increased travel time, the irregularity in follow-up increases, resulting in a greater number of casts. Parents' literacy level is significantly associated with child discomfort during castings (p=0.037). This may be attributed to the fact that maintenance of casts in the home is not as per doctors' instructions. The parents might ignore instructions about handling the child with a cast, like keeping the cast dry. The income level of parents is strongly associated with follow-up (p=0.008), child discomfort in casting (p=0.002) as well as bracing (p=0.015). The parents from lower-income groups have reported more irregular follow-ups and child discomfort. In some cases, the direct cost of treatment is lower than indirect costs like food and lodging. Travel problems become a big challenge for parents who belong to the lower-income group and reside in rural areas. It is challenging to find trains/buses as per the appointment schedule. 16% of participants said they have to start the journey the day before and travel by bus/train at night. The bus/train reaches Jaipur early in the morning, between 1 a.m. and 4 a.m. Then, they spend 4–8 h at a bus stand/railway station before proceeding to the clinic between 8 or 9 a.m. A typical travel arrangement for low-income rural parents is shown in Fig. 2 (Add Fig. 2 here).

Typical travel arrangement of low-income rural parents for CTEV treatment of their child.
Fig. 2 Typical travel arrangement of low-income rural parents for CTEV treatment of their child.
3.2

3.2 Discussion

In India, CTEV management has undergone several changes in the last decade due to improvements in infrastructure, road and internet connectivity, literacy rate, economy, etc. These improvements helped eliminate some challenges like social stigma and lack of awareness to a certain extent. The free treatment in government hospitals, NGOs' support, and awareness campaigns have increased the number of patients seeking CTEV treatment. At the start of the last decade, a study was conducted including 19 parents and highlighted the challenges of doctor expertise, treatment cost, social stigma, lack of awareness, physical distance, and brace compliance.10 These challenges were similar as reported by studies in low income countries like Uganda, Kenya and Madagascar16–19 conducted around same time. With decreased biased by directly talking to parents and large sample size has resulted in increased power of this study. The statistical analysis results are useful to categorically summarize the contemporary challenges.

With the government and NGOs supporting the treatment, the direct costs of treatment are not a challenge anymore in India, but indirect costs are still a hindrance. A study has shown that gender and transport duration significantly affect CTEV treatment in India.20 However, our study shows that female children are presented for treatment earlier than male children. The reason is that the parents are more protective of male children, and in many cases, some rituals are performed at a certain age without which the male child is not supposed to travel.

3.3

3.3 Conclusions

This study is the first of its kind in India conducted with the direct participation of parents. India has the second-highest population globally, with a 64.6% rural population and a poverty rate of 21.9%. The doctor availability is 8.6/per 10,000 people, with a per capita health expenditure of 3.5%.14 The availability of an expert doctor for CTEV treatment can be assumed to be less than 8.6 therefore it is challenging to provide quality health services in India. The challenges become more prominent for patients when the treatment duration is long and regular follow-ups are required, as in the case of Clubfoot. The study shows that patients who travel long distances in public transport are the most vulnerable regardless of gender.

One solution is to use the Uganda model, where the weekly clinics specialize in CTEV treatment. Along with a better skill set of the expert doctor, it also provides the opportunity to sensitize the paramedical staff about the deformity and treatment practice, which increases the confidence and awareness among parents. However, this approach requires a massive push from the government to overcome infrastructure and administrative hurdles.

Another more suitable approach may include using latest technologies to develop novel solutions. As far as brace compliance is concerned, there is a need for continuous monitoring of the compliance. The researchers have attempted various solutions including development of corrective orthosis, dynamic braces and integration of sensors.21 The solution might lie in a low-cost orthosis for correction and maintenance. Such orthosis should be based on Ponseti's understanding of the biomechanics of the Clubfoot to achieve effective outcomes.

Funding

This work was supported by grant number BIRAC/SIIC0107/BIG-14/19 by Biotechnology Industry Research Assistance Council (BIRAC), Department of Biotechnology (DBT), Government of India.

Ethics approval

The study was approved by Institute Ethical Committee MNIT via order no: DRC-14/2021/288.

Consent to participate

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Consent for publication

The authors affirm that human research participants provided informed consent for publication.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Institutional ethical committee approval

The study was approved by Institute Ethical Committee MNIT via order no: DRC-14/2021/288.

Authors contribution

Shamsher Singh: Conceptualization, Methodology, Data curation, Statistical Analysis, Writing- Original draft preparation; Harlal Singh Mali: Conceptualization, Supervision, Writing- Reviewing and Editing; Anil Kumar Jain: Conceptualization, Supervision, Writing- Reviewing and Editing.

References

  1. , , , , . Clubfoot. Curr Orthop.. 2008;22:139-149.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. , , , , , . Kite versus ponseti method in the treatment of 235 feet with idiopathic clubfoot. Medicine (Baltimore). 2015;94:e1379.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Clubfoot facts and information.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. , , , , . Late recurrence of clubfoot deformity: a 45-year followup. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2003:188-192.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. , , , , , . Ponseti technique for the correction of idiopathic clubfeet presenting up to 1 year of age. A preliminary study in children with untreated or complex deformities. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2006;126:15-21.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. , , , . Efficacy of ponseti technique in virgin and relapsed clubfeet: a comparative study. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2018;57:1110-1114.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. , , , , , . The Ponseti method in Latin America: initial impact and barriers to its diffusion and implementation. Iowa Orthop J. 2011;31:30-35.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. , , , , , . Barriers to the Ponseti method in Peru: a two-year follow-up. Iowa Orthop J. 2013;33:172-177.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. , , , , , , . From cutting to casting: impact and initial barriers to the Ponseti method of clubfoot treatment in China. Iowa Orthop J. 2010;30:1-6.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. , , , et al . Qualitative assessment of the challenges to the treatment of idiopathic clubfoot by the Ponseti method in urban India. Iowa Orthop J. 2012;32:135-140.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. , , , et al . Evaluation of the progress and challenges facing the Ponseti method program in Vietnam. Iowa Orthop J. 2012;32:125-134.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. , , , , . The Ponseti method of treatment for clubfoot in Brazil: barriers to bracing compliance. Iowa Orthop J. 2013;33:161-166.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. , , , . Clubfoot treatment in 2015: a global perspective. BMJ Glob Heal. 2018;3:1-7.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. India - the world factbook.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. , , , . Problems encountered by parents of infants with clubfoot treated by the Ponseti method in Madagascar: a study to inform better practice. J Rehabil Med. 2016;48
    [Google Scholar]
  16. , , . Barriers experienced by parents of children with clubfoot deformity attending specialised clinics in Uganda. Trop Doct. 2009;39:15-18.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. , , , , . The Uganda Sustainable Clubfoot Car. Understanding the barriers to clubfoot treatment adherence in Uganda: a rapid ethnographic study. Disabil Rehabil. 2007;29:845-855.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. , , , . Barriers experienced by service providers and caregivers in clubfoot management in Kenya. Trop Doct. 2015;45:84-90.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. , , , , , . Factors affecting compliance to hospital visit among clubfoot patients: a cross-sectional study from a tertiary referral clubfoot clinic in the developing country. J Orthop Surg. 2019;27:1-4.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. , , . Clubfoot: review on assessment, treatment, challenges, and engineering aspects. JPO J Prosthetics Orthot. 2022;34:e114-e130.
    [Google Scholar]
Show Sections