Translate this page into:
Comparison of bony increased offset-reverse shoulder arthroplasty and standard reverse shoulder arthroplasty outcomes
∗Corresponding author: Muhammad Umar. umardr@gmail.com
-
Received: ,
Accepted: ,
This article was originally published by Reed Elsevier India Pvt. Ltd. and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.
Abstract
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to evaluate functional outcomes and complications between the standard RSA and BIO-RSA. 65 consecutive procedures were performed in 60 patients (40 BIO-RSA and 25 RSA). There was no statistically significant difference in functional outcome, pain and complications.
The BIO-RSA can produce comparable, if not better functional results than a standard RSA whilst reducing the rates of scapula notching, prosthesis instability, lost shoulder rotation and poor shoulder contour. It should therefore be considered in all patients presenting with cuff tear arthropathy, massive rotator cuff tear and fracture sequelae.
Keywords
Reverse shoulder replacement arthroplasty complications outcomes

1 Introduction
Anatomical shoulder replacements have shown excellent results1 at reducing pain and restoring shoulder motion when used in patients with primary or secondary degenerative conditions. However, in patients where the function of the rotator cuff is lost, functional outcomes become variable.2–5 This occurs due to superior migration of the humeral head, which reduces tension in the deltoid muscle, thus creating an unstable centre of rotation. This functional variability has led surgeons to look for a prosthesis that provides more predictable results for patients with concurrent rotator cuff deficiencies.
In 1985, Professor Paul Grammont designed his first reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) prosthesis.6 He advocated the use of a large metallic head on the glenoid side with a medialised centre of rotation and a cup on the humeral side. The medialised centre of rotation restored the length of deltoid muscle and provided a longer lever arm for anterior elevation. Grammont's early design was later modified into the Delta® RSA. He later published the results of 14 patients with cuff tear Arthropathy (CTA) treated using his Delta® RSA,7 showing significantly improved shoulder function, however a high number of complications were reported.
Several studies have since reported on the midterm results of patients treated using a Grammont type prosthesis6,8–10 (Table 1). Despite promising functional results studies have identified a number of problems with the Grammont type RSA (Table 2).
1.1 Prosthetic instability
Prosthetic instability manifests itself as prosthetic dislocation where there is a gap between the humeral cup and glenoid sphere, with Wall et al. noting this in 7.5% of cases,10 Boileau et al. in 6.6%6 and Werner et al. in 8.6%.9 It is felt that prosthetic instability results as a consequence of humeral medialisation, which decreases the tension of the deltoid muscle. Deltoid muscle tension can be restored intra-operatively by increasing the offset on the humeral cup, however great care must be taken as over-tensioning can lead to acromial fractures.
1.2 Scapular notching
In all studies reviewed, scapular notching has been noted in more than 50% of cases.8–11 The Grammont type RSA medialises the glenoid component thus lowering the humerus. This anatomical change can cause impingement of the medial aspect of the polyethylene humeral cup on the scapular neck inferiorly with the arm adducted. In addition to direct impingement, more severe cases of scapular notching may be caused by polyethylene particle wear causing osteolysis of the scapular neck (Fig. 1).

1.3 Deficient or absent external rotation
The Grammont type RSA has not demonstrated an improvement in active external rotation in the literature.8–11 The limited lateral offset of the glenosphere limits the possibility of rotation of the humeral cup around it with the shoulder in adduction. In addition, the medialised centre of rotation decreases the amount of posterior deltoid muscle fibres that can be used to compensate for the absent external rotators.
1.4 Deficient or absent internal rotation
Just as the studies showed no significant increase in active external rotation, active internal rotation also shows no significant improvement.8–11 Again this is explained by the medialised centre of rotation, which leads to limited excursion of the cup around the glenosphere in the horizontal plane and decreases the possibility of using the anterior deltoid to compensate for the absent internal rotators.
1.5 Loss of shoulder contour
Finally, the medialisation of the glenosphere and subsequent lowering of the humerus leads to a loss of the normal shoulder contour. This was raised as a concern in a study by Boileau et al.11
To address these problems Boileau et al. adopted a novel approach to address the problematic issues encountered with the standard medialised RSA.12 He advocated the use of an autologous bone graft harvested from the humeral head on a specifically designed baseplate to lateralise the prosthesis. They called it the bony increased-offset reversed shoulder arthroplasty (BIO-RSA) (Fig. 2).

2 Aim
The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes of the BIO-RSA compared to the standard RSA in a single centre over a two-year period.
3 Materials and methods
3.1 Patients
Sixty consecutive patients underwent 65 procedures over a two-year period starting from September 2013 at a single centre. All procedures were completed by one consultant surgeon experienced in RSA surgery (MW). The indications for surgery were; cuff tear Arthropathy (44 patients), revision prosthesis (9 patients of which; 3 resurfacing hemiarthroplasty, 3 total shoulder replacements and 3 hemiarthroplasty), proximal humerus fracture (3 patients) and post-traumatic osteoarthritis (2 patients).
There were 40 men (62.7%), 3 of whom had bilateral surgery and 25 women (37.3%), 2 of whom had bilateral surgery. Their mean age at time of surgery was 74.1 years (range, 49 to 89) with an average follow up of 7.1 months (3.4–24 months).
Patients were allocated their procedure based on indication, surgeon preference and pre-existing bone quality of the glenoid.
3.2 Surgical technique
All patients were operated in beach chair position under general anaesthesia, regional anaesthesia or a combination of both. A standard deltopectoral approach was used and an Aequalis Reversed™ Shoulder Arthroplasty (Tornier Inc, Houston, Texas, USA) prosthesis was used in all cases.
The standard RSA was implanted using the manufacturers standard technique.14
The technique for implanting the BIO-RSA differs from the standard RSA. Following a standard deltopectoral approach and conservative capsulotomy, a 155° inclined humeral guide is placed on the apex of the humeral head and a retroversion rod is used to establish the desired retroversion (0° to 30° according to the trans-epicondylar axis). A 2.5 mm, threaded guidewire is then inserted into this axis and the humeral guide is removed.
The BIO-RSA, 29 mm graft reamer is guided along the threaded guidewire to create a flat surface of subchondral bone. A 8.3 mm cannulated drill is then advanced over the alignment pin to create a central hole of the graft before a bell saw is used to create a cylinder of cancellous bone 29 mm in diameter. A cutting guide is then used to harvest the desired thickness of bone graft (either 7 mm or 10 mm). The disc of pure cancellous bone is then extracted and inserted onto the BIO-RSA baseplate (Fig. 3).

The glenoid is prepared using a 29 mm reamer over a guidewire (either 0° or 10° inferior tilt). It is advised to ream approximately 5 mm until cancellous and/or bleeding bone is reached to better facilitate bony integration of the BIO-RSA graft (Fig. 4).

A central 8 mm hole is drilled over the glenoid guidewire, to accommodate the long post baseplate. Fixation is then obtained with impaction and two 4.5 mm convergent non-locking compression screws and two 4.5 mm divergent locking screws. The glenosphere is then fixed to the baseplate via a Morse taper and countersunk set screw.
3.3 Authors’ modifications to standard technique
3.3.1 Chamfering of the autologous bone graft
In cases of extreme ante- or retroversion of the glenoid, or excessive posterior wear, positioning of the guidewire as per the manufacturer's guidelines may result in excessive reaming into the scapular neck, or insufficient reaming of the rim of the glenoid. Using our technique, the guidewire is placed concentrically in the glenoid to allow optimum reaming. The ante- or retroversion is then corrected by chamfering the autologous graft to restore alignment before final implantation of the base plate (Fig. 5).

3.3.2 Screw positioning
The Manufacturers recommend the use of divergent non-locking and convergent locking screws to fix the base plate. In our experience, the screw position is determined by the anatomy of the glenoid neck. The screws may penetrate the cortex if placed too divergent. The locking screws may contact the long post of the base plate (required with the BIO-RSA), if placed convergent. The Authors’ normal practice is therefore to place the screws as per the standard technique where possible, otherwise to place them perpendicular to the base plate.
3.3.3 Glenosphere implantation
The authors’ normal practice is to obliterate the dead space inside the glenosphere with antibiotic impregnated collagen fleece (Septocoll®, Biomet UK or Collatamp®,EUSA Pharma UK) to reduce the risk of infection.
The remainder of the procedure was performed using the manufacturers standard surgical technique.
3.4 Rehabilitation
Patients were discharged 1–2 days following surgery with a Polysling for the first 2 weeks. The rehabilitation protocol was identical for both the BIO-RSA and the standard RSA.13 Following surgery, the patients were educated on sling management with immobilisation for two weeks. Patients were provided with an ice band and encouraged to continue application as required during the rehabilitation period. Commencement of the initial post-operative exercises was conditional upon the dissipation of the nerve block and included elbow, wrist and hand with shoulder pendular exercises and active assisted external rotation. The amount of external rotation permitted was assessed intra-operatively dependent on the quality of the Pectoralis Major and Subscapularis tendon repairs, typically between neutral and 30°.
Prior to discharge, an Occupational Therapy assessment was undertaken to assess the patients’ home environment and ability to complete activities of Daily Living (ADL).
At 2 weeks, the patients were advised to wean themselves from the sling, precautions being given to avoid weight-bearing through the operated arm, to restrict lifting to that of a cup/toothbrush and movements such as extension, internal rotation, and combined abduction with external rotation. Active assisted exercises within a 90° elevation and anterior to scapular plane, with initial recruitment for anterior deltoid and scapular disassociation work was commenced.
As patients gained pain-free range of movement and could perform static joint holds at a 90° flexion whilst supine, patients were progressed to active movements and advancement of the deltoid rehab protocol.
Between 6 and 12 weeks, patients progressed to active movements through range and a graduated deltoid training regime against gravity. An individually tailored regime was provided to each patient, focusing on movement quality in order to address scapular dyskinesis and poor movement patterns.
At 12 weeks, if patients could demonstrate pain-controlled functional range of movement with no signs of instability, specific strengthening goals were designed to achieve each patient's individual realistic goals or functional demands.
The timescales cited were for guidance only and were dependent on functional level pre-surgery, co-morbidity and status of the rotator cuff.
3.5 Follow up
All patients were retrospectively evaluated with a mean follow up period of 7.1 months (3.4–24 months). Their Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS) and range of movements were evaluated before and after surgery.14 Episodes of instability were noted along with other complications experienced during the follow up period.
Bone graft incorporation and formation of a scapular notch was assessed with regular radiography. Patients had a plain antero-posterior (AP) radiograph at day one, an AP and axillary at 2 weeks, with an AP, axial and lateral at 6 weeks and an AP and axial at 3 months. Finally a CT scan was advised at 3 and 6 months.
3.6 Statistical analysis
Descriptive statistics were reported for demographic data. Differences between groups were made using Student's t-test (paired) for reported outcomes and range of motion. The level of statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS 22.0 software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).
4 Results
At the time of writing, 65 procedures had been followed up with a mean period of 7.1 months (3.4–24 months). Twenty-two patients had been discharged with an average time to discharge of 16.1 months (3.4–37.4 months). Forty-three patients remain under active follow up.
Patient outcomes following both procedures were positive with 92% of all patients reporting they only had occasional or no pain. Active forward flexion in the BIO-RSA group was 92.2° post-operatively compared to 90.5° in the RSA group, with no statistical significance found between the two groups (p = 0.826). Likewise, there was no significant difference between post-operative abduction in each group (p = 0.601). Patients treated with a BIO-RSA had 93.3° post-operatively compared to 88.6° in the RSA group (Table 3).
| Bio – RSA | RSA | P Value (test) | |
| Number (n) | 40 | 25 | |
| Active Forward Flexion | 92.2° (70-120°) | 90.5 (50–130°) | 0.826 (paired t) |
| Active Abduction | 93.3° (80–120) | 88.6° (40-160°) | 0.601 (paired t) |
| Pain Free/Occasional Pain | 91.7% | 92% |
Oxford shoulder scores were also very positive post-operatively with both the BIO-RSA and RSA having a mean post-operative Oxford score of above 40 signifying satisfactory joint function (Table 4).
| Pre-operative (oxford score) | Post-operative (oxford score) | |
| BIO-RSA (n = 40) | 4.9 (0–13) | 43.7 (36–48) |
| RSA (n = 25) | 7.9 (0–19) | 40.2 (32–48) |
4.1 Complications
There was one case of deep infection presenting with sero-sanguinous discharge from the superior part of the wound at 7 months. A wound swab grew Staphylococcus aureus and the patient had a revision of all mobile parts and a 3 month course of oral antibiotics. At 18 months her Oxford score was 39.
One patient had a post-operative haematoma secondary to low molecular weight heparin prophylaxis, this resolved with conservative management.
5 Discussion
The Grammont type RSA is able to restore shoulder function in the presence of an irreparable rotator cuff tear and glenohumeral arthritis.8–11 By medialising the centre of rotation of the glenohumeral joint and lowering the humerus, surgeons are able to increase the deltoid lever arm and overcome absent or weak rotator cuffs.
Although early functional results of the RSA are excellent,8–11 high numbers of complications including: prosthetic instability, scapular notching, loss of shoulder contour, and deficient external and internal rotation have been reported in the literature.
These complications have all been attributed to the humeral medialisation after RSA. Boileau et al. therefore developed a novel approach to address this problem. He advocated the use of an autologous bone graft from the humeral head to lateralise prosthesis, calling the procedure BIO-RSA.12
In 2011, Boileau et al. published his early results of patients whom underwent a BIO-RSA.12 The indications for surgery were cuff tear arthropathy, massive rotator cuff tear and fracture sequelae. He demonstrated that active forward elevation increased by 60°, active external rotation by 10° and internal rotation by 1.3 points. The average increase in Constant score was 35 points. These findings were equivalent to or better than those reported with the standard medialised Grammont RSA for CTA8–11,15(Table 5).
| Parameter | Grammont RSA (Mole and Favard)15 | BIO-RSA (Boileau et al.) |
| Number of cases (n) | 484 | 42 |
| Follow up | 52 | 38 |
| Constant score | 62 | 66 |
| Active anterior elevation | 130° | 146° |
| Active external rotation | 13° | 23° |
| Active external rotation (>S1) | 26 | 86 |
| Scapular Notching | 68% | 19% |
| Prosthetic instability | 3.4% | 0% |
| Glenoid Loosening | 3.6% | 0% |
Boileau et al. reviewed plain radiographs and CT scans of the patients treated with his BIO-RSA.12 He found that 98% (41 of 42) of cases had evidence of the cancellous bone graft healing on the native glenoid and no patients had any evidence of glenoid component loosening. Scapular notching was still present, however only in 19% (8 of 42) of cases.
Boileau et al. concluded that the BIO-RSA improved the results obtained with a medialised RSA. By lateralising the centre of rotation, impingement of the medial aspect of the polyethylene humeral cup on the inferior scapular neck is reduced thus reducing rates of scapular notching. In addition, a lateralised centre of rotation increases shoulder mobility by increasing the clearance for the humeral cup around the glenosphere and shoulder stability by improving the tension of the deltoid and remaining rotator cuff.
A cohort study by Athwal et al. compared the functional and radiological results following a BIO-RSA and standard RSA.16 Each cohort had 20 patients with no significant difference in their demographics (age, sex, follow up duration) (p > 0.05). Similar to Boileau et al. there was no significant difference between cohorts when comparing active forward elevation (P = 0.418), active external rotation (P = 0.999), active interval rotation (P = 0.071), shoulder strength (P > 0.376), and Constant score (P = 0.917). However, the frequency of scapular notching was significantly higher (P = 0.022) in the RSA group (75%) compared to the BIO-RSA group (40%).
Similarly, a recent comparative cohort study by Kirzner et al. reports similar improvements in measured functional outcomes with a lower scapular notching rate in BIO-RSA group.17
In our study, there was no statistically significant difference between the BIO-RSA and standard RSA in terms of active ROM or OSS. However, similar to previous studies, the BIO-RSA group has shown lower rate of scapular notching, with better shoulder mobility and stability whilst maintaining a normal shoulder contour. In view of its comparable functional outcomes with lower rates of complications, it is reasonable to perform this procedure in primary RSA.
6 Conclusion and limitations
Shoulder arthroplasty in the arthritic, rotator-cuff deficient shoulder is a difficult surgical problem. Total shoulder arthroplasty may deliver unpredictable functional results and the RSA may have associated complications. To improve the biomechanics of the RSA, Boileau et al. advocated lateralising the glenosphere with a bony augment, thus decreasing impingement of the humeral cup on the scapular neck whilst maintaining the centre of rotation at the prosthesis-glenoid interface, thereby minimising torque on the glenoid component. The BIO-RSA therefore produces the same excellent functional improvements as the RSA, whilst reducing complications such as scapular notching, prosthesis instability, poor internal/external rotation and stability.
Although the results are promising, there were some limitations to the study. It was a retrospective single-centre study. The mean follow up period was 7.1 months, however this may be a reflection of early return to good or excellent shoulder function negating the need for prolonged follow up periods. Finally patients were assigned their procedure based on indication, surgeon preference and pre-existing glenoid bone quality potentially causing selection bias. Our results are comparable to other studies which would indicate that any inadvertent selection bias was insignificant.
The authors recommend that BIO-RSA is considered instead of RSA in appropriate patients, due to similar functional outcomes and reduced risk of complications.
Funding
The authors received no financial, material or other support for this work.
References
- A Comparison of Hemiarthroplasty and Total Shoulder Arthroplasty in the Treatment of Primary Glenohumeral Osteoarthritis: Results of a Multicenter Study. 2003:207-213.
- [Google Scholar]
- Prosthetic replacement of the shoulder for the treatment of defects in the rotator cuff and the surface of the glenohumeral joint. J Bone Joint Surg (JBJS). 1993 Apr;75(4):485-491.
- [Google Scholar]
- Hemiarthroplasty for glenohumeral arthritis with massive rotator cuff tears. Orthop Clin. 1998 Jul;29(3):477-489.
- [Google Scholar]
- Glenoid loosening in total shoulder arthroplasty. Association with rotator cuff deficiency. J Arthroplast. 1988;3(1):39-46.
- [Google Scholar]
- Bipolar shoulder arthroplasty for rotator cuff arthropathy. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 1997 Nov;6(6):512-515.
- [Google Scholar]
- Grammont reverse prosthesis: design, rationale, and biomechanics. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2005 Jan;14(1 Suppl S):147S-161S.
- [Google Scholar]
- Delta shoulder prosthesis for rotator cuff rupture. Orthopedics. 1993 Jan;16(1):65-68.
- [Google Scholar]
- Grammont inverted total shoulder arthroplasty in the treatment of glenohumeral osteoarthritis with massive rupture of the cuff. Results of a multicentre study of 80 shoulders. J Bone Jt Surg Ser B. 2004 Apr;86(3):388-395.
- [Google Scholar]
- Treatment of painful pseudoparesis due to irreparable rotator cuff dysfunction with the Delta III reverse-ball-and-socket total shoulder prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg (JBJS). 2005 Jul;87(7):1476-1486.
- [Google Scholar]
- Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a review of results according to etiology. J Bone Joint Surg (JBJS). 2007 Jul;89(7):1476-1485.
- [Google Scholar]
- Neer Award 2005: the Grammont reverse shoulder prosthesis: results in cuff tear arthritis, fracture sequelae, and revision arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2006 Sep;15(5):527-540.
- [Google Scholar]
- Bony increased-offset reversed shoulder arthroplasty: minimizing scapular impingement while maximizing glenoid fixation. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011 Sep;469(9):2558-2567.
- [Google Scholar]
- Rehabilitation Following Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty. 2007 Dec;vol. 37:734-743.
- [Google Scholar]
- The Oxford Shoulder Score Revisited. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2009 Jan;vol. 129:119-123.
- [Google Scholar]
- Does bony increased-offset reverse shoulder arthroplasty decrease scapular notching? J Shoulder Elb Surg Elsevier. 2015 Mar;24(3):468-473.
- [Google Scholar]
- Reverse shoulder arthroplasty vs BIO-RSA: clinical and radiographic outcomes at short term follow-up. J Orthop Surg Res BioMed Central. 2018 Oct 16;13(1):256.
- [Google Scholar]