Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Case Report
Clinical research study
Current Issue
Editorial Board
Literature Review
Narrative review
Original Article
Research Article
Review Article
Short Report
Surgical techniques
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Case Report
Clinical research study
Current Issue
Editorial Board
Literature Review
Narrative review
Original Article
Research Article
Review Article
Short Report
Surgical techniques
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

30 (); 66-71
doi:
10.1016/j.jor.2022.02.018

A cortical screw based tension band construct for transverse patella fractures: An evolving strategy for addressing common modes of failure

Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA

∗Corresponding author: Taylor Paziuk. taylor.paziuk@jefferson.edu

Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Reed Elsevier India Pvt. Ltd. and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

Abstract

Abstract

Displaced patella fractures represent a clinical challenge. We evaluate the effectiveness of an alternative fixation construct to address common modes of fixation failure.

A retrospective review of 49 patients who underwent fixation via the specific construct at a single institution between 2013 and 2019.

Median follow-up was 52.7 weeks (Mean: 75.4 weeks; SD: 54.9; range: 27–267.7 weeks). Construct failure rate was 6.1% (3/49). This included two mechanical hardware failures, one the result of trauma and the other due to noncompliance.

The modified construct represents a safe and effective means of treating transverse patella fractures.

Level 4.

Keywords

Patella
Fracture
Tension band
Failure
1

1 Introduction

Patella fractures represent a relatively small proportion of orthopaedic injuries seen in skeletally mature patients. With estimates around 1%, these fractures most commonly follow direct trauma, as is the case with falls or dashboard injuries.1,2 They can also occur via an indirect mechanism, due to the tensile forces applied to the patella via the extensor mechanism of the lower extremity.3 Fracture patterns associated with the patella typically depend on the mechanism of injury, associated force, and underlying bone quality.4 Regardless of the degree of comminution, a majority of patella fractures have a transverse component as a major feature. Those with a disrupted extensor mechanism, and/or those with articular incongruity generally require open reduction and internal fixation. Multiple operative techniques are described. Challenges of fixation include a limited anterior soft tissue envelope, minimal surrounding periosteum, and most importantly the forces of tension that make successful internal fixation difficult, regardless of the construct employed. Complications, including early failure of fixation, are relatively common, compared to other fractures.

For transverse fractures of the patella (Fig. 1), modified tension band constructs have been considered the gold standard for operative fixation, based on biomechanical principles of fixation.5–8 While variations exist, they function, in part, by converting the distraction forces applied to the patella via the quadriceps and patella tendons into compressive forces at the articular surface.9 Several techniques have been described, varying in how they achieve fixation in the bone and how the tension band is applied. The traditional model employs two longitudinal K-wires acting as anchors for a tension wire passing transversely through the fibers of the quadriceps and patella tendons, across the dorsal cortex of the patella. This has been shown to achieve relatively uniform compression across the fracture. By passing transversely through the quadriceps and patella tendons, the wire is able to take advantage of the entire surface area of insertion, held fast by Sharpey's fibers (Figs. 2 and 3). Because the wire to tendon/bone interface is so strong, the weak link is the K-wires, which are essential in holding the wires anchored in place. The mode of failure of this tension band construct is migration of the k-wires and subsequent loss of anchorage of the tension band wire (Fig. 4).

AP and lateral radiographs of simple transverse Patella fracture.
Fig. 1 AP and lateral radiographs of simple transverse Patella fracture.
Rendition of the Kirschner wire Tension Band Construct.
Fig. 2 Rendition of the Kirschner wire Tension Band Construct.
AP and Lateral Radiographs of the Kirschner wire Tension Band Construct.
Fig. 3 AP and Lateral Radiographs of the Kirschner wire Tension Band Construct.
AP and Lateral Radiographs of the Kirschner wire Tension Band Construct Failure.
Fig. 4 AP and Lateral Radiographs of the Kirschner wire Tension Band Construct Failure.

In part to address this mode of failure, constructs have been introduced that utilize two longitudinal, cannulated, partially threaded screws with a wire or suture passed through the central cannulation, in place of the K-wires (Figs. 5 and 6). This model was intended to improved fixation, based on the thread-bone interface that screws provide. In addition, it was felt to be less prominent and therefore less likely to lead to symptomatic hardware and subsequent hardware removal (Fig. 7).5,10,11

Rendition of the cannulated screw tension band construct.
Fig. 5 Rendition of the cannulated screw tension band construct.
AP and lateral radiographs of the cannulated screw tension band construct.
Fig. 6 AP and lateral radiographs of the cannulated screw tension band construct.
AP and lateral radiographs of the cannulated screw tension band construct failure.
Fig. 7 AP and lateral radiographs of the cannulated screw tension band construct failure.

However, the switch from K-wires to cannulated screws did more than simply change the anchor points for the wire. It also changed the way the wire functions. When passed around longitudinal K-wires, the tension band wire gets its fixation on the bone from the broad insertions of the tendons into bone, through Sharpey's fibers. However, when the wire is passed through parallel screws, the orientation of the wire is changed 90°. The wires, running longitudinally, come into direct contact with the bone at the poles, and apply the force of fixation through very limited points of contact. This difference theoretically alters the potential modes of failure of the two methods. The K-wire and tension band wire constructs most often fail with primary loss of K-wire position, and subsequent loss of tension wire function.4,7,8 Conversely, those with cannulated screws would more likely fail as a result of bone fragmentation at the areas of concentrated force, where the wires contact the bone, as the screw threads are less likely to lose positional fixation compared to K-wires.1 This proposed difference led to the development of a hybrid fixation construct, that builds on the strength of each technique.

These methods are widely employed, and yet studies continue to report failure rates around 10%.5–7,12–16 This record of performance, as well as our own observed failures, was the impetus for an evolution in fixation strategy.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of a fixation construct that evolved from both above-described techniques to avoid fixation failure, recognizing the strengths and weaknesses of each. We have therefore established construct failure as the primary clinical outcome measure. This simple technique involves two parallel, fully threaded cortical screws, placed longitudinally in the patella, with enough proximal and distal overhang to allow them to act not only as screws, but as posts, around which the tension band wire is anchored. The screws can gain independent fixation in the proximal and distal poles, but more importantly, because they are threaded, they do not have a tendency to migrate or become displaced. Because the tension band wire is passed transversely through the quadriceps and patellar tendons, the forces applied through the wire are shared along a broad insertion, and anchor to the bone via Sharpey's fibers, which is among some of the strongest tissues in the body (Figs. 8 and 9).

Rendition of the cortical screw tension band construct.
Fig. 8 Rendition of the cortical screw tension band construct.
AP and lateral radiographs of cortical screw tension band construct.
Fig. 9 AP and lateral radiographs of cortical screw tension band construct.
2

2 Methods

Following Institutional Review Board approval, an electronic medical record database query was performed to identify all cases of patella fractures treated with open reduction internal fixation using the previously described technique by a single surgeon at a single institution between 2013 and 2019. Excluded were cases of suture only fixation through bone tunnels, revision surgery, or those who did not have a minimum of 6 month follow up. Operative reports were used to collect intraoperative and demographic variables that included case duration, fixation technique, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status score (ASA), and patient age and sex. Postoperative imaging was also reviewed to confirm fixation techniques. Body mass index (BMI), Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) scores, patient smoking status, and postoperative deep vein thrombosis (DVT) prophylaxis regimens were also determined through electronic medical record review. The postoperative course was reviewed, and any complications, revisions, or subsequent surgeries were documented.

Data was collected and analyzed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS Inc, Ver 26.0). Demographic and outcome characteristics of the study population were reported using descriptive statistics. Outcome measures were established to assess the relative risks associated with BMI, CCI score, smoking status, and patient age and sex. The reported outcomes included surgery duration, construct failure (defined as breakage, migration, or cut out in the setting of a persistent radiographic nonunion and corresponding clinical symptoms attributable to said nonunion or hardware failure), symptomatic removal of hardware (ROH), and revision surgery. Relative risks (RR) for construct failure were calculated and potential predictors of construct failure were identified using binary logistic regression analysis. Patients lacking clinical follow-up were excluded from statistical analysis. Statistical significance for all testing was established at p < 0.05.

2.1

2.1 Operative technique

At surgery, the patient is positioned supine on a radiolucent table or diving board with a soft bump of 2 folded bath blankets placed underneath the ipsilateral hip to internally rotate the leg to neutral, with the patella pointing straight up. A radiolucent foam ramp can be placed under the leg to facilitate lateral fluoroscopy and give the knee slight flexion to aid in screw placement. The skin of the leg is cleaned with sterile skin prep. Standard extremity drapes are applied.

A direct anterior approach is made to the patella, down to the retinaculum with wide medial and lateral flaps. The fracture is identified, and hematoma is debrided with a combination of irrigation and suction. It may be helpful to sharply excise the edges of torn retinaculum and periosteum over the patella to better visualize the fracture ends. The patella is reduced with either 2 Wb clamps or patella bone clamps. The articular reduction should be checked with lateral fluoroscopy and direct palpation with a finger through the torn or incised parapatellar retinaculum.

Once anatomic reduction is achieved, it is secured with two 3.5 mm fully threaded cortical screws placed longitudinally from distal to proximal. Position of the screws should be along the subchondral bone in the anterior-posterior direction and dividing the patella into thirds in the medial-lateral direction. To aid in the start point of the 2.5 mm drill, the patella tendon should be incised longitudinally along the inferior patellar pole and drilled under fluoroscopic guidance. Rotating the leg internally and externally so that the medial and lateral facets of the patella are parallel with fluoroscopy can aid in assessing the true position of the screws. The length of the screws should be approximately 10–15 mm longer than the measured length of patella and left long and proud for adequate anchorage of the tension band wire, both proximally and distally.

Once the screws are placed, an 18g angiocatheter is directed through the quadriceps tendon just proximal to the patella and posterior to the ends of the cortical screws. The sharp is removed and a 1 mm wire is threaded through the catheter and the catheter is removed. This is repeated distally to place another wire through the patella tendon and posterior to the heads of the cortical screws. One wire is crossed over the patella and the ends of the two wires are twisted together to form a Fig. 8 tension band construct. The two connections should be twisted together at the same time to ensure even tension throughout. The twists are cut with a wire cutter and bent downward to minimize soft tissue irritation. In cases of more severe comminution, or in those with poor bone quality, a second set of wires, either in a figure of 8, or in a figure of 0 to disperse the forces, can be added. The medial and lateral retinacula, if torn, are approximated and repaired with interrupted heavy nonabsorbable suture. The wound is irrigated and closed in standard layered fashion. Postoperatively, the patient is weight bearing as tolerated in a knee brace locked in extension for 8 weeks.

3

3 Results

Forty-nine patients were identified and included in the final study cohort. An additional eleven patients were identified but lacked adequate postoperative follow-up. Median follow-up was 52.7 weeks (Mean: 75.4 weeks; SD: 54.9; range: 27–267.7 weeks). There were 15 males and 34 females in the cohort with a mean age of 61.7 years old (SD: 15.4; range: 21–84 years old). The mean CCI score was 0.47 (SD: 0.74; range: 0.0–2.0) and the mean age-adjusted CCI score was 3.2 (SD: 1.7; range: 0.0–7.0). Mean BMI was 26.7 (SD: 6.3; range: 18.6–48.9). Thirteen patients (26.5%) had a positive smoking history, with four (8.2%) current smokers and nine (18.4%) former smokers. Mean ASA was 2.1 (SD: 0.61; range: 1.0–3.0). Mean surgery duration was 91.3 min (SD: 44.1 min; range: 37–274 min. Enoxaparin was the most frequently utilized DVT prophylactic, used in 16 patients. Aspirin was used in 14 patients. Other documented DVT prophylaxis regimens included, aspirin and dipyridamole (n = 1), and aspirin and clopidogrel (n = 1). The rate of construct failure was 3/49 (6.1%). This included two mechanical hardware failures, one the result of a fall, and one occurring in a patient who was noncompliant with our postoperative extremity protocol that involves wearing a knee brace locked in extension for a minimum of 8 weeks. The third construct failure was secondary to deep infection. All three failures required revision ORIF. There was also one medical complication in the cohort, which was an episode of postoperative cardiac arrest secondary to lidocaine administration (Table 1). Female sex, BMI ≥30.0, age ≥65 years old, ASA ≥3, age-adjusted CCI ≥4, and positive smoking history carried no significantly increased risk for construct failure (Table 2) and were not significant predictors for construct failure (all p > 0.05). Reoperations also included 30 patients (61.2%) who underwent planned removal of symptomatic hardware during the study period.

Table 1 Characteristics of patients experiencing therapeutic complications.
Patient ID Sex Age Smoking Status Body Mass Index Mechanical Hardware Failure Nonunion Injury Infection Revision ORIF
2 F 75 Former 20.4 Y N Y N Y
7a F 72 Never 39.7 N N N N N
20 F 39 Former 31.9 Y N Y N Y
23 F 77 Never 25.6 N Y N Y Y
Patient experienced postoperative cardiac arrest.
Table 2 Relative risk for construct failure associated with demographic variables.
Variable Relative Risk 95% Confidence Interval P value
Female Sex 3.1 0.17–55.9 0.452
BMI ≥ 30.0 1.5 0.15–14.8 0.729
Age ≥ 65 1.9 0.18–19.3 0.604
ASA ≥ 3 0.52 0.03–9.9 0.664
Age-adjusted CCI ≥ 4 3.5 0.15–80.4 0.437
Positive Smoking History 1.5 0.16–14.7 0.708
4

4 Discussion

The patella is the largest sesamoid bone in the body and serves to optimize the quadriceps function in the lower extremity.4 It augments the extensor and counter-flexion mechanisms of the knee by providing a longer lever arm for the quadriceps muscle group.17–22 Accordingly, the patella can be subjected to compressive and tensile forces beyond 3000 N, which far exceed the standard body weight of even a significantly overweight general population.22 These unique biomechanical forces highlight some of the challenges of fixing patella fractures, but also underscore the necessity to treat them definitively with surgery.

Despite the fact that outcomes following internal fixation of patella fractures have improved significantly over time, failure rates still remain quite high.14–16 Lin et al. demonstrated a failure rate of 7.7% with a cannulated-screw modified tension-band construct, while Bonnaig et al. described a nonunion rate of 10% in the K-wire modified tension-band construct.13,15 Though the failure rate of our study (6.1%) did not differ significantly from what is seen in the literature, our failure rate included all patients requiring revision fixation for osseous nonunion and hardware failure regardless of how it developed. This included one patient who refractured after a fall and another who did not wear her extension brace postoperatively. If those two patients were excluded, the failure rate for the cortical screw tension band construct falls to 2.0% (1/49). However, similar instances of noncompliance could likely be cited among some of the reported failure rates in the literature.

The patella is relatively lacking in its soft tissue envelope, leading to a somewhat unforgiving environment for surgical implants. It has a relatively sparse periosteal layer, and thus healing can be challenging. While the rate of infection in our study was only 2.0%, reports from other fixation constructs approach 10%, contributing to the significant morbidity associated with these injuries.14–16,23–25

4.1

4.1 Limitations

There are several limitations of this study. The first is its retrospective nature, lending itself to concerns over selection bias. In the five-year study period, there were only 4 patients who received a different tension-band construct. They did not differ significantly from the cortical-screw cohort with regards to patient demographics in the form of CCI, age, gender, BMI, or smoking status. Indications for other techniques were not well documented. Another limitation is the lack of a comparison group, given the lack of a control group, we are left with only historical comparisons. This leaves open the possibility that other variables may be responsible for outcomes such as surgeon technique, native bone quality, baseline activity level, or perioperative care. It is also important to recognize that the rate of hardware removal is quite high. While some may view this as a complication, we consider it a planned part of treatment. Given the relative lack of soft tissue envelope, there is poor tolerance of any fixation in the patella. Patients are counseled about this at the time of initial treatment and offered elective hardware removal 6 months post operatively. While this is of obvious concern as it relates to cost of care, we feel that loss of reduction or catastrophic hardware failure (total loss of fixation construct) represent much greater concerns and therefore believe the costs of a brief second operation are outweighed by the lower risk of catastrophic failure. This study did not report on functional results. Rather, our goal was simply to examine catastrophic failure of fixation. While this may not be the only factor that leads to a negative outcome, it is certainly the most significant and the most directly related to fixation construct.

The technique employed here evolved from observing the failures of previous methods of fixation. By avoiding the vulnerable aspects of previous constructs (loss of positional stability in K-wire constructs, limited points of tension band wire contact using cannulated screw constructs), and using instead the strengths of each method (stability of screw thread-bone interface, large surface area for tension band wire contact), there is hope that this technique is an improvement in fixation of a challenging fracture.

5

5 Conclusions

A modified tension band construct that utilizes cortical screws is a viable option for treating transverse patella fractures. Although this construct is associated with a high rate of hardware removal, the overall failure rate is below historical rates for other modified tension band constructs, especially after considering recurrent trauma and patient noncompliance as contributing factors. Further investigation is necessary to validate this technique.

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

References

  1. , , , . Patellafrakturen. Fractures of the patella. Unfallchirurg. 2010;113(5):401-411.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. , , , . Results of partial patellectomy. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1991;110:246-249.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. , , , . Patellar fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469(4):1213-1215.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. , , , , , , . Current concepts review: fractures of the patella. GMS Interdiscip Plast Reconstr Surg DGPW. 2016;5:Doc01.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. , , , . Comminuted displaced fractures of the patella. Injury. 1981;13(3):196-202.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. , , , , , . Indications and results of nonoperative treatment of patellar fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res (289):197-201.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. , , , , . Evaluation of methods of internal fixation of transverse patella fractures: a biomechanical study. J Orthop Trauma. 1994;8(2):147-153.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. , , , , , . Biomechanical evaluation of current patella fracture fixation techniques. J Orthop Trauma. 1997;11(5):351-356.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. , , , , , . Results of treatment of displaced patellar fractures by partial patellectomy. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1990;72(9):1279-1285.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. , , . Patella fractures. Evaluation and treatment. Am J Knee Surg. 1997;10(2):101-108.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. , , , et al . Cyclic long-term loading of a bilateral fixed-angle plate in comparison with tension band wiring with K-wires or cannulated screws in transverse patella fractures. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013;21(2):311-317.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. , . Open reduction internal fixation of displaced transverse patella fractures with figure-eight wiring through parallel cannulated compression screws. J Orthop Trauma. 1997;11(8):573-576.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. , , , , . Manual of Internal Fixation: Techniques Recommended by the AO-ASIF Group. 1991
    [Google Scholar]
  14. , , , , , . Comparison of the outcomes of cannulated screws vs. modified tension band wiring fixation techniques in the management of mildly displaced patellar fractures. BMC Muscoskel Disord. 2015;6:16.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. , , , et al . Complications following tension-band fixation of patellar fractures with cannulated screws compared with Kirschner wires. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013;95(7):653-659.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. , , , et al . Fix it or discard it? A retrospective analysis of functional outcomes after surgically treated patella fractures comparing ORIF with partial patellectomy. J Orthop Trauma. 2015;29(2):80-84.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. , , , , , , . Patellar surface strain. J Orthop Res. 1986;4(3):372-377.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. , . Mechanical function of the patella. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1971;53(8):1551-1560.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. , , . Biomechanics of the patellofemoral joint. Clin Orthop Relat Res (144):9-15.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. , , , , . Biomechanical evaluation of various forms of fixation of transverse patellar fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 1987;1(3):219-222.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. , , . Patella fractures. Evaluation and treatment. Am J Knee Surg. 1997;10(2):101-108.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. , , , , . Force ratios in the quadriceps tendon and ligamentum patellae. J Orthop Res. 1984;2(1):49-54.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. , , , et al . Meta-analysis of re-operation, nonunion, and infection after open reduction and internal fixation of patella fractures. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012;73(4):928-932.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. , , , , , . Patellar fractures: contemporary approach to operative treatment, using different types of the tension band principles. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 1999;9:21-26.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. , , , , , . Early complications in the operative treatment of patella fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 1997;11(3):183-187.
    [Google Scholar]
Show Sections